Gender Issues

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 113–129

The State of American Boyhood

Original Article


The existence of a “boy crisis” in the United States is a topic of public policy debate. This study examines the state of American boyhood, using not only the commonly reviewed indicators of school achievement but also mental health, premature death, injury, delinquency, and arrests. Boys are in trouble in many areas: low rates of literacy, low grades and engagement in school, high dropout from school, and dramatically higher rates of placement in special education, suicide, premature death, injuries, and arrests. Girls, however, suffer from other problems, especially depression, suicidal ideation and attempts, and eating disorders, and are less likely to achieve at the very highest levels in mathematics and science. This study argues that both boys and girls suffer from characteristic problems, but the issues affecting boys are serious and neglected.


Boys Gender Writing achievement Reading achievement Suicide of boys 


  1. 1.
    American Association of Medical Colleges (2006). Women enrollment and graduates in US Medical Schools, 1961–2006. Table 29. Accessed 10 October 2008.
  2. 2.
    American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls. New York: Marlowe.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Bar Association. (2008). Enrollment and degrees awarded 1963–2008. Accessed 10 October 2008.
  4. 4.
    American College Test (2007). ACT High school profile report: The graduating class of 2007. Accessed 18 April 2008. For state scores in Colorado, see For state scores in Illinois, see Accessed 18 April 2008.
  5. 5.
    Bailey, N. (2007). Patterns of depressive symptoms in children. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 20(2), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchmann, C., & Diprete, T. A. (2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71, 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Center for Disease Control. (2005). Mental health in the United States: Prevalence of diagnosis, medication treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder–United States, 2003. MMWR, 54(34), 842–847.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaplin, D., & Klasik, D. (2006). Gender gaps in college and high school graduation by race, combining public and private schools. Washington: Urban Institute, Mathematica Policy Research.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cichetti, D., & Toth, S. (1998). The development of depression in children and adolescents. American Psychologist, 53(2), 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science, Engineering. (2006). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Condition of Education (2007). Special analysis 2007: High school coursetaking. Department of Education: National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed 10 October 2008.
  13. 13.
    Corbett, C., Hill, A., & St. Rose, A. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Digest of Education Statistics (2007). Percentage of gifted and talented students in public elementary and secondary schools, by sex, race/ethnicity, and state: 2002–2004. Table 51. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed 10 October 2008.
  15. 15.
    Edelman, P., Holzer, H. J., & Offner, P. (2006). Reconnecting disadvantaged young men. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edina Public Schools (2002). Gender difference and student learning. Edina Public Schools, Research Report to the Edina Board of Education. Gender Task Force Research Committee. Accessed 19 June 2008.
  17. 17.
    Education Week (2008). June 5. Diplomas count 2008 27(40). Washington, DC: Editorial Projects in Education.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Farrell, W. (2005). Why men earn more. New York: Amacom Books.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Freeman, C. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls & women:2004. Washington, DC: US Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2005-016.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Freeman, C., & Fox, M. A. (2005). Status and trends in the education of American Indians and Alaska Natives. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2005108.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gilliam, W. S. (2005). Prekindergarteners left behind: Expulsion rates in prekindergarten programs. Foundation for Child Development Brief Series No. 3.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Kuziemko, B. (2006). The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 12139. Accessed 9 July 2008.
  24. 24.
    Greene, J. P., & Winters, M. A. (2006). Leaving boys behind: Public high school graduation rates. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, No. 48. Accessed 15 July 2008.
  25. 25.
    Gurian, M. (2001). Boys and girls learn differently! A guide for teachers and parents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2005). The minds of boys: Saving our sons from falling behind in school and life. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Ellis, M. C., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    James, A., & Taylor, E. (1990). Sex differences in the hyperkinetic syndrome of childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 31(3), 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kafer, K. (2007). Taking the boy crisis in education seriously: How school choice can boost achievement among boys and girls. Washington, DC: Independent Women’s Forum, Position Paper No. 604.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. (2000). Raising Cain: Protecting the emotional life of boys. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    King, J. (2006). Gender equity in higher education: 2006. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Center for Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Knapp, L. G., Kelly-Reid, J. E., Ginder, S. A., Miller, E. (2007). Postsecondary institutions in the United States: Fall 2006 and degrees and other awards conferred: 2005–2006. Washington, DC: Department of Education, National Center for Education Sciences. NCES 2007-166.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maughan, B., Rowe, R., Messer, J., Goodman, R., & Meltzer, H. (2004). Conduct disorder and oppositional defiant disorder in a national sample: Developmental epidemiology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(3), 609–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mead, S. (2008). The truth about boys and girls. Washington, DC: Education Sector.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moffitt, T., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. S. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mortenson, T. (2006). The state of American manhood. Postsecondary education opportunity: public policy analysis of opportunity for postsecondary education, Number 181.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). United States high school sophomores: A twenty-two year comparison, 1990–2002. Statistical analysis report. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, NCES-2006-327.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). America’s high school graduates: Results from the 2005 NAEP high school transcript study. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2007-467.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Programs. (2005). 25th Annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act, vol.1. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Orenstein, P. (1994). School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Orfield, G. (2006). Dropouts in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Perna, L. (2004). The benefits of higher education: Sex, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic group differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2004.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Grosset Putnam.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Planty, M. S., Provasnik, W., Hussar, W., Snyder, T., Kena, G., Hampden-Thompson, G., Kinkes, R., & Choy, S. (2007). Condition of education 2007. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2007-064.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pollack, W. (1998). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pryor, J. H., Hutardo, S., Saenz, V. B., Santos, J. L., & Korn, W. S. (2007). The American freshmen forty year trends, 1966–2006. University of California, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1995). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sax, L. (2007). Boys adrift. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schott Foundation. (2006). Given half a chance: The Schott 50 state report on public education and black males. Cambridge, MA: The Schott Foundation for Public Education.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sciutto, M. J., Nolfi, C. J., & Bluhm, C. (2004). Effects of child gender and symptom type on referrals for ADHD by elementary school teachers. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12(4), 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Simpson, G. A., Cohen, R. A., Pastor, P. N., & Reuben, M. A. (2008). Use of mental health services in the past 12 months by children aged 4–17 Years: United States, 2005–2006. Washington: DC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Accessed 15 September 2008.
  53. 53.
    Sommers, C. H. (2000). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sum, A., Fogg, N., & Harrington, P. (2003). The growing gender gaps in college enrollment and degree attainment in the U.S. and their potential economic and social consequences. Boston: Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The “boy turn” in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 471–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wilmette School District. (2006). Gender similarities and differences in learning, development and performance: A Report by the District 39 Community Review Committee. Wilmette, Illinois. Accessed 28 July 2008.
  57. 57.
    Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. (2007). Washington, DC: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Adolescent and School Health Accessed 29 May 2008.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA

Personalised recommendations