Advertisement

Gender Issues

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 267–288 | Cite as

Examining Sex Differences in the Use of Direct and Indirect Aggression

  • Sibylle Artz
  • Diana Nicholson
  • Douglas Magnuson
Original Article

Abstract

Direct and indirect aggressive behaviors were studied using surveys and interviews of students in two public schools. The variables of “sex-of-aggressor” and “sex-of-target” were included. Claims in previous research that girls engage in far more indirect aggression than boys are not supported. Further, it was found that girls are more likely to target the opposite sex with direct aggression than boys. This suggests more gender fluidity in the use of aggression by girls and adds to a growing body of research that dispels the notion that direct and indirect aggression can be neatly sorted into male and female categories of behavior.

Keywords

Aggression Sex differences Direct aggression Indirect aggression Prevalence and preferences for forms of aggression Sex of target 

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, D. (1992). Biology does not make men more aggressive than women. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 17–25). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alder, C. (1998). “Passionate and willful” girls: Confronting practices. Women & Criminal Justice, 9(4), 81–101.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alder, C., & Worrall, A. (2004). A contemporary crisis? In C. Alder & A. Worrall (Eds.), Girls’ violence: Myths and realities (pp. 1–20). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Artz, S. (1997). On becoming an object: Sex and the violent school girl. Journal of Child & Youth Care, 1(2), 17–38.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Artz, S. (1998). Sex, power, and the violent school girl. Toronto, Ontario: Trifolium Books.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Artz, S. (2000). The guys here degrade you: Youth perspectives on sex. Journal of Child and Youth Care, 14(4), 29–46.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Artz, S. (2005). To die for: Adolescent girls’ search for male attention. In D. Pepler, K. Madsen, C. Webster, & K. Levene (Eds.), Development and treatment of girlhood aggression (pp. 137–159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Artz, S., Blais, M., & Nicholson, D. (2000). Developing girls’ custody units, phase 1 report to Justice Canada, Ottawa, ON.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Artz, S., & Riecken, T. (1994a). A Study of violence among adolescent female students in a suburban school district. Ministry of Education, Research & Evaluation Branch, and Gender Equity Programs.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Artz, S., & Riecken, T. (1994b). Final report: A study of violence among adolescent female students in a suburban school district. For Gender Equity Programs, Ministry of Education and Ministry Responsible for Multiculturalism and Human Rights.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Artz, S., & Riecken, T. (1995a). A community based violence project, first quarter report. B.C. Health Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Artz, S., & Riecken, T. (1995b). Final report: A study of violence among adolescent female students in a suburban school district. For the Vancouver Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Artz, S., Riecken, T., MacIntyre, B. & Lam, E. (1997). A community based violence prevention project, fourth quarter report. Submitted to the BC Health Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Artz, S., Riecken, T., MacIntyre, B., Lam, E. & Maczewski, M. (1998). A community based violence prevention project, sixth quarter report. Submitted to the BC Health Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Artz, S., Riecken, T., MacIntyre, B., Lam, E. & Maczewski, M. (1999a). A community based violence prevention project, seventh quarter report. Submitted to the BC Health Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Artz, S., Riecken, T., MacIntyre, B., Lam, E., & Maczewski, M. (1999b). A community based violence prevention project, final report. Submitted to the BC Health Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Artz, S., Riecken, T., MacIntyre, B., Lam, E., & Maczewski, M. (2000). Theorizing gender differences in receptivity to violence prevention programs in schools. BC Counselor, 22(1), 7–36.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Atkin, C., Smith, S., Roberto, A., Fediuk, T., & Wagner, T. (2002). Correlates of verbally aggressive communication in adolescents. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(3), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baines, & Alder, C. (1996). Are girls more difficult to work with? Youth workers’ perceptions in juvenile justice and related areas. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Batchelor, S., Burman, M., & Brown, J. (2001). Discussing violence: Let’s hear it for the girls. Probation Journal, 48(2), 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Björkqvist, K., & Niemelä, P. (1992). New trends in the study of female aggression. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 3–16). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukianen, A. (1992). The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies in males and females. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 51–64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burman, M., Brown, J., & Batchelor, S. (2003). “Taking it to heart”: Girls and the meanings of violence. In E. Stanko (Ed.), The meanings of violence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cairns, R., Cairns, B., Neckarman, H., Ferguson, L., & Gariepy, J. (1989). Growth and aggression: 1. Childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Campbell, A. (1995). A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethnology and Sociobiology, 16, 100–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Card, N., Hodges, E., Little, T., & Hawley, H. (2005). Gender effects in peer nominations for aggression and social status. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chesney-Lind, M. (1999). Media misogyny: Demonizing “violent” girls and women. In J. Ferrell & N. Websdale (Eds.), Making trouble: Cultural constructions of crime, deviance, and control (pp. 115–140). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chesney-Lind, M., & Irwin, K. (2004). From badness to meanness popular constructions of contemporary girlhood. In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power and identity (pp. 45–56). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Craig, W. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Crick, N. (1993). Relational aggression: Gender differences in the expression of aggressive behavior. In S. Asher (Chair), Social relationships, social beliefs, and aggression. Symposium Conducted at the Annual General Meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 1993, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crick, N., & Grotpeter, J. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Crick, N., & Grotpeter, J. (1996). Children’s treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 367–380.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cullerton-Sen, C., & Crick, N. (2005). Understanding the effects of physical and relational victimization: The utility of multiple perspectives in predicting social-emotional adjustment. School Psychology Review, 34(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    David, C., & Kistner, J. (2000). Do positive self-perceptions have a “dark side”? Examination of the link between perceptual bias and aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28(4), 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Doob, A., & Cesaroni, (2004). Responding to youth crime in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Galen, B., & Underwood, M. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gendreau, P., & Archer, J. (2005). Subtypes of aggression in humans and animals. In R. Tremblay, W. Hartup, & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 25–46). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Giroux, H. (1996). Fugitive cultures: Race, violence and youth. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Harris, M. (1991). Effects of sex of target, sex of aggressor and relationship on evaluations of physical aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(2), 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harris, M. (1996). Aggression, gender and ethnicity. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1(2), 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hawley, P., & Vaughn, B. (2003). Aggression and adaptive functioning: The bright side to bad behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(3), 239–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Henington, C., Hughes, J., Cavell, T., & Thompson, B. (1998). The role of relational aggression in identifying aggressive boys and girls. Journal of School Psychology, 36(4), 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hilton, N., Harris, G., & Rice, M. (2000). The functions of aggression by male teenagers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 988–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hindelang, M., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kimmel, M., & Mahler, M. (2003). Adolescent masculinity, homophobia and violence: Random school shootings, 1982–2001. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(1), 1439–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Björkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11- to 12-year old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lahelma, E. (2002). Gendered conflicts in secondary school: Fun or enactment of power? Gender and Education, 14(3), 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Little, T., Jones, S., Henrich, C., & Hawley, P. (2003). Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(2), 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    McCreary, D. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles, 31(9/10), 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Messerschmidt, J. (1995). From patriarchy to gender: Feminist theory, criminology and the challenge of diversity. In N. H. Rafter & F. Heidensohn (Eds.), International feminist perspectives in criminology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Messerschmidt, J. (1997). Crime as structured action: Gender, race, class, and crime in the making. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Miller, J. (2001). One of the guys: Girls, gangs and gender. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Miller, J. (2002). The strengths and limits of ‘doing gender’ for understanding street crime. Theoretical Criminology, 6(4), 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pellegrini, A., Roseth, C., Milner, S., Bohn, C., Van Ryzin, M., Vance, N., et al. (2007). Social dominance in preschool classrooms. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(1), 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Peterson, L., & Rigby, K. (1999). Countering bullying at an Australian secondary school with students as helpers. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Richardson, D., & Green, L. (1999). Social sanction and threat explanations of gender effects on direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Richardson, D., & Green, L. (2006). Direct and indirect aggression: Relationships as social context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(10), 2492–2508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Riecken, T., Artz, S., MacIntyre, B., Lam, E., & Maczewski, M. (1998). A community based violence prevention project, fifth quarter report. Submitted to the BC Health Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Roecker, C., Caprini, J., Dickerson, J., Parks, E., & Barton, A. (1999). Children’s responses to overt and relational aggression. Paper Presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, March.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rozak, T., & Rozak, B. (Eds.). (1970). Masculine and feminine. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Simmons, R. (2002). Odd girl out. New York, NY: Harcourt, Inc.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Smith, P., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R., & Liefooghe, A. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child Development, 73(4), 1119–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sprott, J., & Doob, A. (2004). Youth justice in Canada. In M. Tonry & A. Doob (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of the research (Vol. 31, pp. 185–242). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tannenbaum, L. (1999). Slut! Growing up female with a bad reputation. New York, NY: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tremblay, J. (2000). The origins of youth violence. Isuma: The Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 1(2), 19–24.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Vaillancourt, T. (2005). Indirect aggression among humans: Social construct or evolutionary adaptation? In R. Tremblay, W. Hartup, & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 158–177). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2004). The social context of children’s aggression. Girls and aggression: Contributing factors and intervention principles (pp. 57–73). New York, NY: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Werner, N., & Nixon, C. (2005). Normative beliefs and relational aggression: An investigation of the cognitive bases of adolescent aggressive behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(3), 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Xie, H., Cairns, R., & Cairns, B. (2002). The development of social aggression and physical aggression: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yubero, S., & Navarro, R. (2006). Students’ and teachers’ views of gender-related aspects of aggression. School Psychology International, 27(4), 488–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zimmer-Gembeck, M., Geiger, T., & Crick, N. (2005). Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behavior, and peer relations: Gender moderation and bidirectional associations. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(4), 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sibylle Artz
    • 1
  • Diana Nicholson
    • 1
  • Douglas Magnuson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Child and Youth CareUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations