Advertisement

Earth Science Informatics

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 205–216 | Cite as

Assessing hydro-morphological changes in Mediterranean stream using curvilinear grid modeling approach - climate change impacts

  • Giasemi G. Morianou
  • Nektarios N. Kourgialas
  • George P. Karatzas
  • Nikolaos P. Nikolaidis
Research Article

Abstract

The objective of this work was the estimation of time-space hydraulic (water depth, flow velocity) and morphological (sediment transport and bank erosion) characteristics in the downstream part of a Mediterranean stream under current and future climatic conditions. The two-dimensional hydraulic model MIKE 21C was used, which has been developed specifically to simulate 2D flow and morphological changes in rivers. The model is based on an orthogonal curvilinear grid and comprises two parts: (a) the hydrodynamic part and (b) the morphological changes part. The curvilinear grid and the bathymetry file were generated using a very high-resolution DEM (1 m × 1 m). Time series discharge data from a hydrometric station introduced in the hydrodynamic part of the model. Regarding the morphological part of the model, field measurements of suspended sediment concentration and of bank erosion were used. The model was calibrated and verified using field data that were collected during high and low flow discharges. Model simulation was in good agreement with field observations as indicated by a variety of statistical measures. Next, for predicting the riverbank change, future meteorological data and river flow data for the next 10 years (2017–2027) were employed. These data series were created according to a lower and a higher emission climate change scenario. Based on the results, an increase in rainfall intensity may cause significant changes in river banks after 10 years (more than 5 m of soil loss in river meanders). Using the obtained simulation results, extreme hydrological events such as floods transporting large sediment loads and changes in river morphology can be monitored. The proposed methodology was applied to the downstream part of the Koiliaris River Basin in Crete, Greece.

Keywords

Curvilinear grid Hydraulic simulation River morphology Mediterranean stream Climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge DHI for providing the MIKE 21C software used in this research work and the “ARISTEIA II” Action (REINFORCE program).

References

  1. Abate M, Nyssen J, Steenhuis TS, Moges MM, Tilahun SA, Enku T, Adgo E (2015) Morphological changes of Gumara River channel over 50 years, upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. J Hydrol 525:152–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bangash RF, Passuello A, Sanchez-Canales M, Terrado M, López A, Elorza FJ, Ziv G, Acuña V, Schuhmacher M (2013) Ecosystem services in Mediterranean river basin: climate change impact on water provisioning and erosion control. Sci Total Environ 458:246–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batalla RJ, Vericat D (2009) Hydrological and sediment transport dynamics of flushing flows: implications for management in large Mediterranean rivers. River Res Appl 25(3):297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhuiyan MA, Kumamoto T, Suzuki S (2015) Application of remote sensing and GIS for evaluation of the recent morphological characteristics of the lower Brahmaputra-Jamuna River, Bangladesh. Earth Sci Inf 8(3):551–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchi V, Salles T, Ghinassi M, Billi P, Dallanave E, Duclaux G (2015) Numerical modeling of tectonically driven river dynamics and deposition in an upland incised valley. Geomorphology 241:353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bussi G, Francés F, Horel E, López-Tarazón JA, Batalla RJ (2014) Modelling the impact of climate change on sediment yield in a highly erodible Mediterranean catchment. J Soils Sediments 14(12):1921–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DHI (2007a) MIKE 11. Environmental Hydraulics, Reference Manual, Horsholm, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  8. DHI (2007b) MIKE21. Reference Manual, Horsholm, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  9. DHI (2011a) MIKE 21C. Curvilinear Model for River Morphology - User Guide, Horsholm, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  10. DHI (2011b) MIKE 21C. Curvilinear Model - Scientific Documentation, Horsholm, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  11. Erol A, Randhir TO (2012) Climatic change impacts on the ecohydrology of Mediterranean watersheds. Clim Chang 114(2):319–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghanem A, Steffler P, Hicks F, Katopodis C (1996) Two-dimensional hydraulic simulation of physical habitat conditions in flowing streams. Regul Rivers Res Manag 12(2–3):185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Githui F, Gitau W, Mutua F, Bauwens W (2009) Climate change impact on SWAT simulated streamflow in western Kenya. Int J Climatol 29(12):1823–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO (1999) Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J Hydrol Eng 4(2):135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Habersack HM (2000) The river-scaling concept (RSC): a basis for ecological assessments. In: Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters. Springer, Netherlands, pp 49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harmel RD, Cooper RJ, Slade RM, Haney RL, Arnold JG (2006) Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds. Trans ASABE 49(3):689–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hassan MA, Church M, Lisle TE, Brardinoni F, Benda L, Grant GE (2005) Sediment Transport And Channel Morphology Of Small, Forested Streams1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(4):853–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henderson JE, Shields FD Jr (1984) Environmental and water quality operational studies. Environmental features for streambank protection projects, Technical Report E-84-11. Department of the Army, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  19. Horritt M, Bates P (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 268(1):87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iowa Department of Natural Resources (2006) How to control streambank erosion. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available at: http://www.iowadnr.gov/portals/idnr/uploads/water/stormwater/streambankmanual.pdf
  21. IPCC (2007) The physical science basis by Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor MMHL, Miller HL. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Isik S (2013) Regional rating curve models of suspended sediment transport for Turkey. Earth Sci Inf 6(2):87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim U, Kaluarachchi JJ (2009) Climate change impacts on water resources in the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45(6):1361–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleinhans MG (2005) Flow discharge and sediment transport models for estimating a minimum timescale of hydrological activity and channel and delta formation on Mars. J Geophys Res 110:E12003.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JE002521
  25. Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP (2013) A hydro-economic modelling framework for flood damage estimation and the role of riparian vegetation. Hydrol Process 27(4):515–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kourgialas N, Karatzas G (2014a) Groundwater contamination risk assessment in Crete, Greece, using numerical tools within a GIS framework. Hydrol Sci J 60(1):111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kourgialas N, Karatzas G (2014b) A hydro-sedimentary modeling system for flash flood propagation and hazard estimation under different agricultural practices. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14(3):625–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP, Nikolaidis NP (2012) Development of a thresholds approach for real-time flash flood prediction in complex geomorphological river basins. Hydrol Process 26(10):1478–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kourgialas NN, Dokou Z, Karatzas GP (2015) Statistical analysis and ANN modeling for predicting hydrological extremes under climate change scenarios: The example of a small Mediterranean agro-watershed. J Environ Manag 154:86–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lane S, Tayefi V, Reid S, Yu D, Hardy R (2007) Interactions between sediment delivery, channel change, climate change and flood risk in a temperate upland environment. Earth Surf Process Landf 32(3):429–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Licciardello F, Zema D, Zimbone S, Bingner R (2007) Runoff and soil erosion evaluation by the AnnAGNPS model in a small Mediterranean watershed. Trans ASABE 50(5):1585–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lilli M (2011) Development of a methodology for the assessment of riverbank erosion in the Koiliaris River, Master’s thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  33. Mano V, Nemery J, Belleudy P, Poirel A (2009) Assessment of suspended sediment transport in four alpine watersheds (France): influence of the climatic regime. Hydrol Process 23(5):777–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Menzel L, Bürger G (2002) Climate change scenarios and runoff response in the Mulde catchment (Southern Elbe, Germany). J Hydrol 267(1):53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merritt WS, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw 18(8):761–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moraetis D, Efstathiou D, Stamati F, Tzoraki O, Nikolaidis NP, Schnoor JL, Vozinakis K (2010) High-frequency monitoring for the identification of hydrological and bio-geochemical processes in a Mediterranean river basin. J Hydrol 389(1):127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morianou GG, Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP, Nikolaidis NP (2016) Hydraulic and Sediment Transport Simulation of Koiliaris River Using the MIKE 21C Model. Procedia Eng 162:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morianou GG, Kourgialas NN, Karatzas GP, Nikolaidis N P (2017) River flow and sediment transport simulation based on a curvilinear and rectilinear grid modelling approach–a comparison study. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, ws2017031Google Scholar
  39. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Naselli-Flores L, Barone Ρ (2005) Water-level fluctuations in Mediterranean reservoirs: setting a dewatering threshold as a management tool to improve water quality. Hydrobiologia 548(1):85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nash J, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nerantzaki S, Giannakis G, Efstathiou D, Nikolaidis N, Sibetheros I, Karatzas G, Zacharias I (2015) Modeling suspended sediment transport and assessing the impacts of climate change in a karstic Mediterranean watershed. Sci Total Environ 538:288–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nunes JP, Seixas J, Pacheco NR (2008) Vulnerability of water resources, vegetation productivity and soil erosion to climate change in Mediterranean watersheds. Hydrol Process 22(16):3115–3134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nunes J, Seixas J, Keizer J, Ferreira A (2009) Sensitivity of runoff and soil erosion to climate change in two Mediterranean watersheds. Part II: assessing impacts from changes in storm rainfall, soil moisture and vegetation cover. Hydrol Process 23(8):1212–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nunes J, Seixas J, Keizer J (2013) Modeling the response of within-storm runoff and erosion dynamics to climate change in two Mediterranean watersheds: A multi-model, multi-scale approach to scenario design and analysis. Catena 102:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Brien J (2006) Users manual FLO-2D, version 2007.06, June 2007. Nutrioso, Arizona, ZDA. Internet: http://www.flo-2d.com/v2007/Documentation/Users_Manual_2007.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2009
  47. Phan D, Wu C, Hsieh S (2011) Impact of climate change on stream discharge and sediment yield in Northern Viet Nam. Water Res 38(6):827–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodríguez-Blanco M, Taboada-Castro M (2010) Factors controlling hydro-sedimentary response during runoff events in a rural catchment in the humid Spanish zone. Catena 82(3):206–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rovira A, Batalla RJ (2006) Temporal distribution of suspended sediment transport in a Mediterranean basin: The Lower Tordera (NE SPAIN). Geomorphology 79(1):58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rovira A, Batalla R, Sala M (2005) Fluvial sediment budget of a Mediterranean river: the lower Tordera (Catalan Coastal Ranges, NE Spain). Catena 60(1):19–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sánchez-Canales M, López-Benito A, Acuña V, Ziv G, Hamel P, Chaplin-Kramer R, Elorza F (2015) Sensitivity analysis of a sediment dynamics model applied in a Mediterranean river basin: global change and management implications. Sci Total Environ 502:602–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Savenije HH (2003) The width of a bankfull channel; Lacey's formula explained. J Hydrol 276(1):176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shen Y, Diplas P (2008) Application of two-and three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics models to complex ecological stream flows. J Hydrol 348(1):195–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soler M, Latron J, Gallart F (2008) Relationships between suspended sediment concentrations and discharge in two small research basins in a mountainous Mediterranean area (Vallcebre, Eastern Pyrenees). Geomorphology 98(1):143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tsanis IK, Koutroulis AG, Daliakopoulos IN, Jacob D (2011) Severe climate-induced water shortage and extremes in Crete. Clim Chang 106(4):667–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ulses C, Estournel C, De Madron XD, Palanques A (2008) Suspended sediment transport in the Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean): Impact of extreme storms and floods. Cont Shelf Res 28(15):2048–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. USAC (2002) HEC-RAS river analysis system user’s manual, version 3.1. USACE Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, California. Available at http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/hecrasdocument.html
  58. Varouchakis E, Giannakis G, Lilli M, Ioannidou E, Nikolaidis N, Karatzas G (2016) Development of a statistical tool for the estimation of riverbank erosion probability. Soil 2(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vozinaki AEK, Morianou GG, Alexakis DD, Tsanis IK (2016) Comparing 1D- and combined 1D/2D hydraulic simulations using high resolution topographic data, the case study of the Koiliaris basin, Greece. Hydrol Sci J.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1255746
  60. Wang H, Yang Z, Saito Y, Liu JP, Sun X, Wang Y (2007) Stepwise decreases of the Huanghe (Yellow River) sediment load (1950–2005): Impacts of climate change and human activities. Glob Planet Chang 57(3):331–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu W, Shields FD, Bennett SJ, Wang SS (2005) A depth-averaged two-dimensional model for flow, sediment transport, and bed topography in curved channels with riparian vegetation. Water Resour Res 41:W03015.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003730
  62. Xu D, Bai Y, Ma J, Tan Y (2011) Numerical investigation of long-term planform dynamics and stability of river meandering on fluvial floodplains. Geomorphology 132(3):195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhu YM, Lu X, Zhou Y (2008) Sediment flux sensitivity to climate change: a case study in the Longchuanjiang catchment of the upper Yangtze River, China. Glob Planet Chang 60(3):429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giasemi G. Morianou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nektarios N. Kourgialas
    • 1
  • George P. Karatzas
    • 2
  • Nikolaos P. Nikolaidis
    • 2
  1. 1.Hellenic Agricultural Organization – DIMITRA, Institute for Olive Tree, Subtropical Crops and Viticulture - Water Resources, Irrigation & Environmental Geoinformatics LaboratoryNational Agricultural Research Foundation (N.AG.RE.F.)ChaniaGreece
  2. 2.School of Environmental EngineeringTechnical University of CreteChaniaGreece

Personalised recommendations