Earth Science Informatics

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 191–196 | Cite as

DigitalOcean: building a platform for scientific collaboration and social and media sharing on the Drupal content management system

Research Article
  • 234 Downloads

Abstract

The DigitalOcean (DO) Project is designed to bring essential Web 2.0 capabilities to an open-source software platform built for scientific collaboration and publishing. The DO platform is being built using the Drupal content management system (CMS). The following are some of the core features of the proposed platform: social networking, media/data sharing/publishing, and collaboration spaces for scientific virtual organizations (VO); active support for VO governance and reputation systems for members and objects; Creative Commons licensing, support for preprint archives and micro-articles, and; professional user-profiles that can be saved as well formatted biosketches. The DO platform serves as a collaboration environment for active research teams, a personal repository for individual researchers, an aggregation/filter for science information, and a scientific publishing tool. This article will outline the history and goals of the DO Project, the core technology concerns and solutions, and the opportunities that this new platform will bring to scientists across the planet.

Keywords

Drupal Social network Social media Reputation system Virtual organization Governance Open access Open source 

Notes

Acknowledgements

To date, activities of the DigitalOcean project have been funded by the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation, Outhink Media, Inc., the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the David & Diane Toole Foundation, the Toole Family Foundation, Oracle, Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment, and Google, Inc., with other contributions from UC Santa Barbara (especially the Carsey-Wolf Center and the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management) and the New Media Research Institute. The Drupal code base is in active development and will be made available (most likely on Github) and seeded back into Drupal open-source repositories.

References

  1. Calhoun C (1992) Introduction. In: Calhoun C (ed) Habermas and the public sphere. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Caron B (2003) Community, democracy and performance: the urban practice of Kyoto’s Higashi-Kujo Madang. Santa Barbara: The New Media Studio. http://junana.com/CDP/corpus/index.html
  3. Caron B (2010, April) Post-publication peer review in the digital age: building a scientific publishing reputation economy using digital badges [internet]. Version 7. Knol. Available from: http://knol.google.com/k/bruce-caron/post-publication-peer-review-in-the/2l8t3cliewok9/45
  4. Dahlberg L (2001) Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere. J Comput-Mediat Comm 7(1)Google Scholar
  5. ESIP Federation (2000) Constitution and bylaws. http://archive.esipfed.org/business/governance/index.html
  6. Gahegan M, Luo J, Weaver S, Pike W, Banchuen T (2008, December) Connecting GEON: making sense of the myriad resources, researchers and concepts that comprise a geoscience cyberinfrastructure. Comput GeosciGoogle Scholar
  7. Giddens A (1994) Beyond left and right—the future of radical politics. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodchild MF (2007, December) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/docs/position/Goodchild_VGI2007.pdf
  9. Hammond T, Hannay T, Lund B, Scott J (2005, April) Social bookmarking tools (I). D-Lib Mag 11(04). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html#_jmp0_
  10. Heinz M, Rice RE (2009) An integrated model of knowledge sharing in contemporary communication environments. In: Beck C (ed) Communication yearbook, 33. Routledge, London, pp 172–195Google Scholar
  11. Hsieh T (2010) Delivering happiness: a path to profits, passion, and purpose. Business Plus, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Hunt T (2008) Happiness as your business model. [Ppt]. http://www.slideshare.net/missrogue/happiness-as-your-business-model-414463. Creative Commons Licenced
  13. Hunt T (2009) The whuffie factor: using the power of social networks to build your business. Crown Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ Sci 10(6):791–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khoo M, Devaul H, Sumner T (2002) Functional requirements for groupware to support community-led collections building. In: Agosti M, Thanos C (Eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Digital Libraries, Rome, September 16–18, 2002. Heidelberg: Springer. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 2458) pp. 190–3Google Scholar
  16. Locke C, Levine R, Searls D, Weinberger D (2001, January) The cluetrain manifesto: the end of business as usual. Perseus Books GroupGoogle Scholar
  17. McLure-Wasko M, Samer F (2005) “Why should I share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice.” MIS Q (29: 1)Google Scholar
  18. Monge P, Desanctis G (1998) Communication processes for virtual organizations. J Comput-Mediat Comm 3(4)Google Scholar
  19. National Science Foundation (2008) Beyond being there: a blueprint for advancing the design, development, and evaluation of virtual organizations. The final report from the workshops on Building Effective Virtual Organizations. Available From: http://www.ci.uchicago.edu/events/VirtOrg2008/
  20. NSDL (2001) Pathways to progress: vision and plans for developing the NSDL. http://doclib.comm.nsdlib.org/PathwaysToProgress.pdf
  21. NSF Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure Task Force on Campus Bridging (2011) Final report. March 2011. Available from: http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/taskforces/TaskForceReport_CampusBridging.pdf
  22. Rhoten D (2003) A multi-method analysis of the social and technical conditions for interdisciplinary collaboration: final report. The Hybrid Vigor Institute, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  23. Shirky C (2008) Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Wiesenfeld BM, Raghuram S, Garud R (1999) Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organ Sci 10(6):777–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Caron
    • 1
  • Dave Toole
    • 2
  • Paul Wicks
    • 3
  • Steve Miller
    • 4
  1. 1.New Media Research InstituteSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Outhink, IncSan MateoUSA
  3. 3.San FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Bren School of Environmental Science & ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations