Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 88–97 | Cite as

The emotional impact of faces (but not names): Face specific changes in skin conductance responses to familiar and unfamiliar people

  • Hadyn D. Ellis
  • Angela H. Quayle
  • Andrew W. Young
Article

Abstract

Skin Conductance Responses (SCRs) to familiar and unfamiliar names and faces were recorded from independent groups of subjects, using two different presentation designs: the first employing fewer familiar than unfamiliar items (Tranel, Fowles, and Damasio, 1985) and the second employing equal numbers of familiar and unfamiliar items. In both designs, familiar faces were responded to significantly more strongly than unfamiliar faces, whereas for names there was no difference in responses to familiar and unfamiliar stimuli. Faces produced significantly larger overall SCRs than names in the unequal familiar/unfamiliar ratio design, but this effect was not observed in the equal ratio design. The results are discussed with particular reference to those previously published by Tranel et al. (1985) and in relation to work both on covert recognition in prosopagnosia and on one of the delusional misidentification syndromes known as the Capgras delusion.

Keywords

Face Recognition Current Psychology Skin Conductance Response Familiar Stimulus Latency Window 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauer, R.M. (1984). Autonomic recognition of names and faces: A neuropsychological application of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Neuropsychologia, 22,457–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruce, V. and Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruce, V. (1988). Recognizing Faces. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, A.M., Bruce, V., and Johnston, R.A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81,361–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton, A.M., Young, A.W., Bruce, V., Johnston, R. and Ellis, A.W. (1991). Understanding covert recognition. Cognition, 39, 129–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., and Van Hoesen, G.W. (1982). Prosopagnosia: Anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology, 32,331–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson, M.E., Schell, A.M., and Filion, D.L. (1990). The electrodermal system. In T. Cacioppo and L.G. Tassinary (Eds.), Principles of Psychophysiology, pp. 295–324. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. de Pauw, K.W. (1994). Psychodynamic approaches to the Capgras delusion—A historical review. Psychopathology, 27,154–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis, H.D. (1975). Recognizing faces. British Journal of Psychology, 409-426.Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, H.D. (1981). Introduction. In G.M. Davies, H.D. Ellis and J.W. Shepherd. Perceiving and Remembering Faces. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, H.D. (1986). Processes underlying face recognition. In R. Bruyer (Ed), The Neuropsychology of Face Perception and Facial Expression. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, H.D and Young, A.W. (1990). Accounting for delusional misidentifications. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 239–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis, H.D., Young, A.W., and Koenken, G. (1993). Covert face recognition without prosopagnosia. Behavioural Neurology, 6,27–32.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, H.D., Young, A.W., Quayle, A.H., and de Pauw, K.W. (1997). Reduced autonomic responses to faces in Capgras delusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B, 264, 1085–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fowles, D.C., Christie, M.J., Edelberg, R., Grings, W.W., Lykken, D.T. and Venables, P.H. (1981). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology, 18,232–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldstein, A.G. and Chance, J.E. (1971). Visual recognition memory for complex configurations. Perception and Psychophysics, 9,237–241.Google Scholar
  17. Hirstein, W. and Ramachandran, V.S. (1997). Capgras syndrome: A novel probe for understanding the neural representation of the identity and familiarity of persons. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B, 264,437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirk, R.E. (1968). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioural Sciences. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  19. Prokasy, W.F. and Kumpfer, K.L. (1973). Classical conditioning. In W.F. Prokasy and D.C. Raskin (Eds.), Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research (pp. 157–202). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Tranel, D. and Damasio, A.R. (1988). Non-conscious face recognition in patients with face agnosia. Behavioural Brain Research, 30, 235–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tranel, D., Fowles, D.C, and Damasio, A.R. (1985). Electro-dermal discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar faces: A methodology. Psychophysiology, 22,403–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Lancker, D. (1991). Personal relevance and the human right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 17, 64–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Venables, P.H. and Christie, M.J. (1980). Electrodermal activity. In I. Martin and P.H. Venables (Eds.), Techniques in Psychophysiology (pp. 3–67). New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  24. Young, A.W. and Ellis, H.D. (1989). Childhood prosopagnosia. Brain and Cognition, 9, 16–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hadyn D. Ellis
    • 1
  • Angela H. Quayle
    • 1
  • Andrew W. Young
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityUSA
  2. 2.York UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations