Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 17, Issue 2–3, pp 163–169 | Cite as

Adaptive and maladaptive narcissism among university faculty, clergy, politicians, and librarians

  • Robert W. Hill
  • Gregory P. Yousey
Article

Abstract

Some adaptive narcissistic characteristics may be prevalent in individuals in occupa-tions that involve leadership or authority, provide social attention and prestige, or require a confident social presentation. The present study investigated the expectation that narcissistic characteristics would be more prevalent in higher status occupations involving frequent opportunities for attention and admiration from others. Of four occupations sampled, politicians scored highest in total narcissism, as well as in leadership and authority; university faculty and librarians did not score particularly high or low on any narcissism indices; and clergy were lowest in exploitativeness and entitlement, which represent the more maladaptive aspects of narcissism. The results were discussed with respect to Holland's (1985) classification of vocational personali-ties.

Keywords

Current Psychology Social Attention Frequent Opportunity Narcissistic Personality Inventory Maladaptive Narcissism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll, L. (1987). A study of narcissism, affiliation, intimacy, and power motives among students in business administration. Psychological Reports, 61, 355–358.Google Scholar
  4. Emmons, R. A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48,291–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,11–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hickman, S., Watson, P. I, and Morris, R. J. (1996). Optimism, pessimism, and the complexity of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hill, R. W. and McFerren, B. P. (1995). Narcissism and a need for approval and admiration. Presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Savannah, GA.Google Scholar
  8. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Meyers, I. B. and McCaully, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  10. Patrick, J. (1990). Assessment of narcissistic psychopathology in the clergy. Pastoral Psychology, 38,(3), 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Raskin, R. and Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Raskin, R. and Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Hill
    • 1
  • Gregory P. Yousey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyAppalachian State University, College of Arts and ScienceBooneNC

Personalised recommendations