Current Psychology

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 291–299 | Cite as

Gender bias and individualism: Responses to case vignettes among psychologists, professors, and students

  • Michael G. Tredinnick
  • Blaine J. Fowers
Articles

Abstract

This study examined the extent to which psychologists, when compared to university professors and evening school students, employ individualist values differentially in their responses to vignettes describing males and females. The participants responded to 6 vignettes by choosing initial hypotheses that reflected either utilitarian (tradition-ally masculine) or expressive (traditionally feminine) themes. Two vignettes involved a sex of client manipulation, but neither resulted in a sex of client effect. An analysis of the responses to the remaining 4 vignettes indicated a marked preference for the masculine form of individualism for males, but were evenly divided for females in all three groups. These results suggest that psychologists were just as likely to engage in bias as others.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belkin, G. S. (1987). Contemporary Psychotherapies, 2nd edition, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  2. Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  3. Bowman, P. (1982). Clinical bias against ‘activity’ in women and implications of female self-concept. International Journal for Advancement of Counseling, 5, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., Rosenkrantz, P. S., & Vogel, S. R. (1970). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corey, G. (1981). Case approach to counseling and psychotherapy, 2nd edition. Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.Google Scholar
  6. Cushman, P. (1990). Why the self is empty. American Psychologist, 45, 599–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fowers, B. J., Applegate, B., Tredinnick, M. G., & Slusher, J. (1996). His and her individualisms? Sex bias and individualism in psychologists' response to case vignettes. Journal of Psychology, 130, 159–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fowers, B. J., Tredinnick, M. G., & Applegate, B. (in press). Individualism and psychotherapy: An empirical examination of the prevalence of individualist values in psychologists' responses to case vignettes. Counseling and Values.Google Scholar
  9. O'Malley, K. M., & Richardson, S. (1985) Sex bias in counseling: Have things changed? Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 294–299.Google Scholar
  10. Philips, R. D. (1985). The adjustment of men and women: Mental health professionals' views today. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 7, 253–260.Google Scholar
  11. Philips, R. D. & Gilroy, F. D. (1985). Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgements of mental health: The Brovermans' findings reexamined. Sex Roles, 12, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Poole, D. A. & Tapley, A. E. (1988). Sex roles, social roles, and clinical judgements of mental heath. Sex Roles, 19, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robertson, J. & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1990). The (mis)treatment of men: Effects of client gender role and lifestyle on diagnosis and attribution of pathology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stearns, B. C, Penner, L. A., & Kimmel, E. (1980). Sexism among psychotherapists: A case not proven. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 548–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Teri, L. (1982). Effects of sex and sex-role style on clinical judgment. Sex Roles, 8, 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wedding, D., & Corsini, R.J., (1989). Case studies in psychotherapy. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Zytowski, D. G. (1971). Diagnostic psychodrama with college freshmen. In L. Diamant (Ed.), Case studies in psychotherapy. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael G. Tredinnick
    • 1
  • Blaine J. Fowers
    • 2
  1. 1.The Union InstituteNorth Miami Beach
  2. 2.University of MiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations