Striving to protect friends and family or holding everyone accountable: Moral expansiveness explains the difference between conservatives and liberals
- 12 Downloads
The current research aimed to explain how conservatives and liberals differ in moral expansiveness, which is the extent to which an individual ascribes moral status to others. Using two measures of moral expansiveness, we demonstrated that both conservatives and liberals give moral regard to in-groups (e.g., friends, family, co-workers), but liberals tend to show more concern for out-groups (e.g., foreign citizen, people with different religious beliefs, members of LGBTI community) than conservatives do. Conservatives reserve their moral concern for friends and family, whereas liberals have no moral boundaries between people. In policy-making, conservatives and liberals disagree when their focuses of moral consideration do not match. We discuss that conflicts between the two can be explained by expansiveness of moral regard for out-groups. The results explain the relationship between political orientation and moral expansiveness and the way an individual includes others in the circle of moral regard.
KeywordsMoral expansiveness Political orientation Attitudes toward out-groups
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
There is no potential conflict of interest pertaining to this submission to Current Psychology.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
- Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kugler, M., Jost, J. T., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27, 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muller, J. Z. (1997). What is conservative social and political thought? In J. Z. Muller (Ed.), Conservativism: An anthology of social and political thought from David Hume to the present (pp. 3–31). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar