Advertisement

The goal-striving reasons framework: Further evidence for its predictive power for subjective well-being on a sub-dimensional level and on an individual goal-striving reasons level as well as evidence for its theoretical difference to self-concordance

  • Christian EhrlichEmail author
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

This paper compares the predictive power of the goal-striving reasons model and the self-concordance model on a sub-dimensional and an individual goal-striving reasons level based on a cross-sectional research design (N = 139). Multiple regression analyses on a sub-dimensional level show that approach, as well as avoidance goal motivation, have higher predictive power in the prediction of affective and cognitive subjective well-being than autonomous and controlled goal motivation. Equally, the predictive power of the four individual goal-striving reasons is generally stronger than the predictive power of the individual self-concordance reasons. The analyses of the theoretical differences between goal-striving reasons and self-concordance show that on an overall goal-striving reasons index level, on a sub-dimensional level as well as on an individual goal-striving reasons level that the goal-striving reasons framework is generally more strongly related to measures representing people’s tendency to be influenced by others in their goal pursuit. Self-concordance is not significantly associated with either of these measures. Based on these findings, it is concluded that the goal-striving reasons framework is more sensitive to the influence of others than self-concordance. The theoretical implications of these findings revolve around the fact that goal-striving reasons can be seen as a more comprehensive goal reason measure than self-concordance. Practical implications point towards the importance of personal assertiveness as a correlate of positive goal-striving reasons.

Keywords

Goal-striving reasons Self-concordance model Subjective well-being Index of autonomous functioning Sociotropy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

I am in agreement with the content and form of the manuscript and the study has been conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the human subjects review committee. This manuscript is not under review elsewhere and is not substantially similar to any manuscript already published.

Conflict of Interest

The author also declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adler, A. (1937). Mass psychology. International Journal of Individual Psychology, 2, 111–120.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, D. R. (2008). In search of the right touch: Interpersonal assertiveness in organizational life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyle, M., & Lu, L. (1990). Happiness and social skills. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1255–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 338–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batson, D. D., Ahmad, N., & Lishner, D. A. (2009). Empathy and altruism. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 417–426). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brunstein, J. C. (1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1061–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carver, C. S., & Baird, E. (1998). The American dream revisited: Is it what you want or why you want it that matters? Psychological Science, 9, 289–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Themes and issues in the self-regulation of behavior. In X. I. I. RS Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Perspectives on behavioral self-regulation: Advances in social cognition (pp. 1–105). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Chancellor, J., Margolis, S. M., Bao, K. J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018). Everyday prosociality in the workplace: The benefits of giving, getting, and glimpsing. Emotion, 18, 507–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (1991). Personality factors in dysphoria: A psychometric refinement of beck’s Sociotropy-autonomy scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment, 13, 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, D. A., Steer, R. A., Beck, A. T., & Ross, L. (1995). Psychometric characteristics of revised sociotropy and autonomy scales in college students. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crocker, J., & Knight, K. M. (2005). Contingencies of self-worth. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15–35). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dickson, J. M. (2006). Perceived consequences underlying approach goals and avoidance goals in relation to anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1527–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivation, beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrlich, C. (2012). Be careful what you wish for but also why you wish for it: Goal-striving reasons and affective subjective well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehrlich, C. (2018). The development of an extended goal-striving reasons framework: Evidence for its relevance in the workplace, for its theoretical difference to self-concordance and for its buffering effect on work intensity. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing. Advance online publication. ISSN 2587-0130.Google Scholar
  22. Ehrlich, C., & Bipp, T. (2016). Goals and subjective well-being: Further evidence for goal-striving reasons as an additional level of goal analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78, 865–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliot, A. J., Sheldon, K. M., & Church, M. A. (1997). Avoidance personal goals and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 915–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ellis, A. (2005). The myth of self-esteem. New York: Prometheus books.Google Scholar
  26. Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ford, M. E., & Nichols, C. W. (1987). A taxonomy of human goals and some possible applications. In M. E. Ford & D. H. Ford (Eds.), Humans as self-constructing systems: Putting the framework to work (pp. 289–311). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafrenière, M.-A. K. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Judge, T. A., Bone, J. E., Erez, A., & Locke, E. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kehr, H. M. (2004). Implicit/explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualisation of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koestner, R., Otis, N., Powers, T. A., Pelletier, L., & Gagnon, H. (2008). Autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and goal progress. Journal of Personality, 76, 1201–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Latham, G. (2012). Work motivation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9, 1–9.Google Scholar
  38. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Powers, T. A., Koestner, R., & Zuroff, D. C. (2007). Self-criticism, goal motivation and goal progress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 826–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raven, B. H. (1992). A power / interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217–244.Google Scholar
  42. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwartz, C., Meisenhelder, J. B., Ma, Y., & Reed, G. (2003). Altruistic social interest behaviors are associated with better mental health. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 778–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Optimal human being: An integrated multi-level perspective. Mahwah: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546–557.Google Scholar
  46. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need-satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sheldon, K. M., & Hoon, T. H. (2007). The multiple determination of well-being: Independent effects of positive traits, needs, goals, selves, social supports, and cultural contexts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stone, D. N. , Deci, E. L. &, Ryan, R. M. (2009). Beyond talk: Creating autonomous motivation through self-determination theory. Journal of General Management, 34, 75–91.Google Scholar
  51. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  52. Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity: A review and a look at the future. In G. Tennenbaum & R. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 59–83). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  53. Van Dyne, L., Graham, J.W. &, Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and Validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 765–802.Google Scholar
  54. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negaive affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A. K., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). The index of autonmous functioning: Development of a scale of human autonomy. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wicker, F. W., Lambert, F. B., Richardson, F. C., & Kahler, J. (1984). Categorical goal hierarchies and classification of human motives. Journal of Personality, 52, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and ManagementOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations