Can adolescents differentiate between depression, anxiety and stress? Testing competing models of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21)
- 35 Downloads
The present study used the Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) procedure and a bifactor-ESEM framework to evaluate the construct validity of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) among adolescents. We also evaluated measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender and age, and investigated the convergent validity of DASS-21 by examining relationships with positive and negative affect. A total of 1906 adolescents (60.7% females, Mage = 16.54) completed the DASS-21, whereas 998 adolescents (62.6% females; Mage = 16.98) completed both the DASS-21 and a measure of positive and negative affect. The results showed that the bifactor-ESEM model was the best representation of the data and this model proved to be invariant across gender and age. The findings indicated a strong general factor of emotional distress underlying responses to all DASS-21 items, but also suggested that Depression and Anxiety subscales possess substantial amount of specificity over and above the general factor. The Stress subscale showed little specificity after partialling out the general factor. Depression subscale explained variance of both positive and negative affect over and above the variance already explained by the general factor, whereas the Anxiety and Stress subscales did not. Our findings show that a bifactor-ESEM framework is a valuable tool for examining structural validity of DASS-21.
KeywordsExploratory structural equation modeling Depression Anxiety Stress Adolescents
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant No. 179006).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2 nded.). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., McGee, R., & Angell, K. E. (1998). Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: Emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 128–140.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Jovanović, V., Gavrilov-Jerković, V., Žuljević, D., & Brdarić, D. (2014). Psihometrijska evaluacija Skale depresivnosti, anksioznosti i stresa-21 (DASS-21) na uzorku studenata u Srbiji [Psychometric evaluation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Serbian student sample]. Psihologija, 47, 93–112.Google Scholar
- Li, C. H. (2014). The performance of MLR, USLMV, and WLSMV estimation in structural regression models with ordinal variables (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigen State University: East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
- Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995a). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation.Google Scholar
- Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 395–436). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Morin, A. J., Arens, A. K., Tran, A., & Caci, H. (2016b). Exploring sources of construct-relevant multidimensionality in psychiatric measurement: A tutorial and illustration using the composite scale of Morningness. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 25, 277–288.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Osman, A., Wong, J. L., Bagge, C. L., Freedenthal, S., Gutierrez, P. M., & Lozano, G. (2012). The depression anxiety stress Scale-21 (DASS-21): Further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 1322–1338.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Price, M., Higa-McMillan, C., Ebesutani, C., Okamura, K., Nakamura, B. J., Chorpita, B. F., & Weisz, J. (2013). Symptom differentiation of anxiety and depression across youth development and clinic-referred/nonreferred samples: An examination of competing factor structures of the child behavior checklist DSM-oriented scales. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1005–1015.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sinclair, S. J., Siefert, C. J., Slavin-Mulford, J. M., Stein, M. B., Renna, M., & Blais, M. A. (2012). Psychometric evaluation and normative data for the depression, anxiety, and stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a nonclinical sample of U.S. adults. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 35, 259–279.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Master (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Willemsen, J., Markey, S., Declercq, F., & Vanheule, S. (2011). Negative emotionality in a large community sample of adolescents: The factor structure and measurement invariance of the short version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21). Stress and Health, 27, e120–e128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar