Advertisement

Recognizing a missing senior citizen in relation to experience with the elderly, demographic characteristics, and personality variables

  • Vicki S. GierEmail author
  • David S. Kreiner
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

We investigated participants’ ability to recognize a missing older adult featured in a mock Silver Alert. In Study 1, college students (N = 712) viewed a Silver Alert of a missing man and then attempted to recognize him when shown a set of photos. Overall recognition was high, with 84.6% of participants identifying the photo of the missing man. Self-reported experience with several older age groups was related to recognition of the target, and female participants were more likely than males to identify the target photo. Recognition of the target was not related to participant age, race, or measures of empathy or conscientiousness. A similar procedure was used in Study 2 with a sample of college students (N = 610), with the addition of measures of attitudes toward the elderly and face recognition ability, which were not found to be related to recognition of the target. Overall recognition rates were again high (83.90%), and participants who reported more experience with the elderly were again more likely to recognize the target. Metacognitive confidence ratings were higher in both studies for individuals who recognized the missing man. The findings suggest that Silver Alerts can be effective under certain circumstances. Further research is needed to investigate whether increasing experience with elderly populations could increase the efficacy of Silver Alerts.

Keywords

Face recognition Silver alerts Individual differences 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

IRB Ethical Statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

“All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Mississippi State University Institutional Review Board and was given Exempt Category 4- Protocol ID: IRB-18492) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.” Compliance Administrator for the HRPP was Nicole Cobb.

Informed Consent

“Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.” There was absolutely no identifying information that would connect the participant with his/her data collected.

Datasets

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the [OSF] repository, https://osf.io/5qmsj/?view_only=38e4ce6c1c214f54aa2b179dce43eccc

References

  1. Algase, D. L. (2006). What's new about wandering behaviour? An assessment of recent studies. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 14, 226–234.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-3743.2006.00043.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Algase, D. L., Moore, H. D., Vandeweerd, C., & Gavin-Dreschnack, D. J. (2007). Mapping the maze of terms and definitions in dementia-related wandering. Aging Mental Health, 11, 686–698.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860701366434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan, L. J., & Johnson, J. A. (2008). Undergraduate attitudes toward the elderly: The role of knowledge, contact and aging anxiety. Educational Gerontology, 35(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270802299780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1043–1047.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Areh, I. (2011). Gender-related differences in eyewitness testimony. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 559–563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bantry White, E., & Montgomery, P. (2015). Dementia, walking outdoors and getting lost: Incidence, risk factors and consequences from dementia-related police missing-person reports. Journal of Aging and Mental Health, 19(3), 224–330.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.924091.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, M. D., & Adams, C. M. (2018). Ageism and aging anxiety among young adults: Relationships with contact, knowledge, fear of death, and optimism. Educational Gerontology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2018.1537163 published online Nov 30, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartlett, J. C., & Leslie, J. E. (1986). Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces. Memory & Cognition, 14, 371–381.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feelings for a member of a stigmatized group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2007). The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 18, 709–712.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowen, M. E., McKenzie, B., Steis, M., & Rowe, M. (2011). Prevalence of and antecedents to dementia-related missing incidents in the community. Dementia Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 31, 406–412.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000329792.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 139–155.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01133.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brigham, J. C., & Ready, D. J. (2005). Own-race bias in lineup construction. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 415–424.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, R., Vivian, J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(5-6), 741–764.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<741::AID-EJSP972>3.0.CO;2-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burbank, P., Dowling-Castronovo, A., Crowther, M., & Capezuti, E. (2006). Improving knowledge and attitudes toward older adults through innovative educational strategies. Journal of Professional Nursing, 22(2), 91–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2006.01.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cadieux, J., Chasteen, A. L., & Packer. (2019). Intergenerational contact predicts attitudes toward older adults through inclusion of the outgroup in the self. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(4), 575–584.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Capis, A. (1984). Contact hypothesis and inter-age attitudes: A field study of cross-age contact. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(1), 74–80 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3033890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section, 48A, 879–894.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cozort, R. W. (2008). Student nurses' attitudes regarding older adults: Strategies for fostering improvement through academia. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 3(1), 21–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2007.07.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Curtis, G. J., Russ, A., & Ackland, C. (2015). More inaccurate but not more biased: Anxiety during encoding impairs face recognition accuracy but does not moderate the own-ethnicity bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(4), 621–627.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Damron-Rodriguez, J., Kramer, B. J., & Gallagher-Thompson. (1998). Effect of geriatric clinical rotations on health professions trainees' attitudes about older adults. Gerontology and Geriatric Education, 19(2), 67–79.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J021v19n02_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral & Cognitive. Neuroscience Review, 3(2), 71–100.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dickter, C. L., Gagnon, K. T., Gyurovski, I. I., & Brewington, B. S. (2015). Close contact with racial outgroup members moderates attentional allocation towards outgroup versus ingroup faces. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(1), 76–88.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214527854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drury, L., Hutchison, P. S., & Abrams, D. (2016). Direct and extended intergenerational contact and young people's attitudes towards older adults. The British Journal of Social Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eberhardt, J. L., Goff, P. A., Purdie, V. J., & Davies, P. G. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 876–893.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.876.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ebner, N. C., He, Y., & Johnson, M. K. (2011). Age and emotion affect how we look at a face: Visual scan patterns differ for own-age versus other-age emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 25(6), 983–997.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.540817.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ebner, N. C., & Johnson, M. K. (2011). Age and emotion affect how we look at a face: Visual scan patterns differ for own-age versus other-age emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 25(6), 983–997.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.540817.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 143–180.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Feingold, C. A. (1914). The influence of environment on the identification of persons and things. Journal of Criminal Law and Police Science, 5, 39–51.Google Scholar
  31. Fleming, S. M. & Lau, H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, online.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443.
  32. Freund, A. M., Kourilova, S., & Kuhl, P. (2011). Stronger evidence for own-age effects in memory for older as compared to younger adults. Memory, 19(5), 429–448.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.583929.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuochi, G., Veneziani, C. A., & Voci, A. (2018). Exploring the social side of self-compassion: Relations with empathy and outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 769–783.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Galinsky, A., & Moskowitz, G. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.708.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gier V. S. (2019). Recognition of a missing person in a mock silver alert in relation to individual difference factors and the effect of an educational video. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34(3), 270–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gier, V. S., & Kreiner, D. S. (2009). Memory of children’s faces by adults: Appearance does matter. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 972–986.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gier, V. S. & Kreiner, D. S. (2019). The effect of educational priming on face recognition from a Silver Alert. The Journal of General Psychology, Accepted for Publication, Aug 9, 2019.Google Scholar
  38. Gier, V. S., Kreiner, D. S., & Hudnell, W. J. (2012). AMBER alerts: Are school-type photographs the best choice for identifying missing children? Journal of Police Criminal Psychology, 27(9), 9–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9085-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gier, V. S., Kreiner, D. S., & Lampinen, J. M. (2016). Factors affecting recognitions of senior citizens in a silver alert. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(3), 185–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9210-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. (2006). The international personality item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gorelik, Y., Damron-Rodrigues, J., Funderburk, B., & Solomon, D. H. (2010). Undergraduate interest in aging: Is it affected by contact with older adults? Journal of Educational Gerontology, 26(7), 623–638.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270050200626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gozdziak, E. M., & Collett, E. A. (2005). Research on human trafficking in North America: A review of literature. International Migration, 43, 99–128.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-7985.2005.00314.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hampson, E., van Anders, S. M., & Mullin, L. I. (2006). A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: Test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(6), 401–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Paolini, S., & Voci, A. (2005). Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes toward older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 393–406.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. He, Y., Ebner, N. C., & Johnson, M. K. (2011). What predicts the own-age bias in face recognition memory? Social Cognition, 29(1), 97–109.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Herlitz, A., & Lovén, J. (2013). Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review. Visual Cognition, 21(9-11), 1306–1336.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.823140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2006). Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by shifting attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 996–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600654750.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ho, M. R., & Pezdek, K. (2016). Post encoding cognitive processes in the cross-race effect: Categorization and individuation during face recognition. Psychonic Bulletin Review, 23(3), 771–780.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0945-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hourihan, K. L., Benjamin, A. S., & Liu, X. (2012). A cross-race effect in metamemory: Predictions of face recognition are more accurate for members of our own race. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 158–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.06.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kloth, N., Shields, S.E., & Rhodes, G. (2014). On the other side of the fence: Effects of social categorization and spatial grouping on memory and attention for own-race and other-race faces. PLOS ONE, 9(9).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Knight, B., & Johnston, A. (1997). The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 4, 265–273. (published online 2010).  https://doi.org/10.1080/713756764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kogan, N. (1961). Attitudes toward old people: The development of a scale and an examination of correlations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 44–54 http://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fh0048053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The big five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 472–477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kramer, T. H., Buckhout, R., & Eugenio, P. (1990). Weapon focus, arousal, and eyewitness memory: Attention must be paid. Law and Human Behavior, 14(2), 167–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lampinen, J. M., Arnal, J. D., Adams, J., Courtney, K., & Hicks, J. L. (2012). Forensic age progression and the search for missing children. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 405–415.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.499873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lampinen, J. M., Arnal, J., & Hicks, J. L. (2009). The effectiveness of supermarket posters in helping to find missing children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(3), 406–423.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lampinen, J. M., Peters, C. S., & Gier, V. S. (2012). Power in numbers: The effect of target set size on prospective person memory in an analog missing child scenario. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 702–708.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lander, K., & Bruce, V. (2004). Repetition priming from moving faces. Memory & Cognition, 32(4), 640–647.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Latonero, M. (September 1, 2011). Human Trafficking Online: The Role of Social Networking Sites and Online Classifieds.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2045851.
  62. Ledonne, E. N., Poirier, C. R., & Craton, L. G. (2009). Reducing own-age bias: Does contact improve young adults’ recognition of older faces? Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 14(4), 137–141 retrieved on 5/7/2019 from https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.psichi.org/resource/resmgr/journal_2009/Winter09JNLeDonne.pdf.Google Scholar
  63. MacAndrew, M., Fielding, E., Kolanowski, A., O'Reilly, M., & Beattie, E. (2017). Observing wandering-related boundary transgression in people with severe dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 21, 1197–1205.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1211620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Macchi Cassia, V., Proietti, V., Gava, L., & Bricolo, E. (2015). Searching for faces of different ages: Evidence for an experienced-based own-age detection advantage in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 1037–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000057.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Malpass, R. S., & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(4), 330–334.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Mazancieux, A., Fleming, S. M., Souchay, C., & Moulin, C. (2018). Retrospective confidence judgments across tasks: domaingeneral processes underlying metacognitive accuracy.  https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dr7ba.
  67. McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1989). The NEO five factor inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  68. McKelvie, S. J. (1987). Sex differences, lateral reversal, and pose as factors in recognition memory for photographs of faces. Journal of General Psychology, 114, 13–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1987.9711052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McKelvie, S. J., Standing, L., St. Jean, D., & Law, J. (1993). Gender differences in recognition memory for faces and cars: Evidence for the interest hypothesis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 447–448.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McShane, R., Gedling, K., Keene, J., Fairburn, C., Jacoby, R., & Hope, T. (1998). Getting lost in dementia: A longitudinal study of a behavioral symptom. International Psychogeriatrics, 10, 253–260 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9785146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3–35.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Moon, H. K., Livne, E., & Marinova, S. V. (2012). Understanding the independent influence of duty and achievement-striving when predicting the relationship between conscientiousness and organizational cultural profiles and helping behaviors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 225–232.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.740539.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., & Giard, M. H. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of age and gender perception on human faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 900–910.  https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903322370816.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Nakawatase, K. (2019). Silver Alerts are like Amber Alerts for older people. Does your state have them? And why is there no federal program in place? Retrieved on July 30, 2019 at https://considerable.com/silver-alerts/
  75. Nelson, T. D. (2005). Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 207–221.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00402.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Subtyping ageism: Policy issues in succession and consumption. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7(1), 36–57.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2012.01042.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Ortman, J. M., Velkoff, V. A., & Hogan, H. (2014). An aging nation: The older population in the United States, Report Number P25-1140. Retrieved on Dec 31, 2018 https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2014/demo/p25-1140.html
  78. Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Petonito, G., & Muschert, G. W. (2015). Silver alert programs: An exploration of community sentiment regarding a policy solution to address the critical wandering problem in an aging population. In M. Miller, J. Blumenthal, & J. Chamberlain (Eds.), Handbook of community sentiment. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  80. Proietti, V., Laurence, S., Matthews, C. M., Zhou, X., & Mondloch, C. J. (2018). Attending to identity cues reduces the own-age but not the own-race recognition advantage. Vision Research.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2012). The own-age bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 146–174.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025750.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Rinehardt, E., Schonfeld, L., Brown, L. M., & Rowe, M. (2014). Silver alert: A recovery system for the lost with dementia. The National Academy for Neuropsychology Bulletin, 28(2), 1–33 http://nanonline.org/docs/ResearchandPublications/NANBulletin/Fall%202014%20Bulletin_Reduced%20File%20Size.pdf#page=33.Google Scholar
  83. Sicafuse, L. L., & Miller, M. K. (2010). Social psychological influences on the popularity of Amber alerts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(11), 1237–1254.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810379618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Slone, A. E., Brigham, J. C., & Meissner, C. A. (2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in whites. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(2), 71–84.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2202_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Soenens, B., Duriez, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Goossens, L. (2007). The intergenerational transmission of empathy-related responding in adolescence: The role of maternal support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 299–311.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206296300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. United States Census Report (2014). Retrieved on Oct 3, 2018 from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2014/demo/p25-1140.html
  87. Valentine, T., Chiroro, P., & Dixon, R. (1995). An account of the own-race bias and the contact hypothesis based on a "face space" model of face recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition: Explorations of face space (pp. 69–94). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Van Bavel, J. J., Swencionis, R. C., O’Connor, C. O., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012). Motivated social memory: Belonging needs moderate the own-group bias in face recognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 707–713.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Verdichevski, M., & Steeves, K. E. (2013). Own-age and own-sex biases in recognition of aged faces. Acta Psychologica, 144(2), 418–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Wallis, J., Lipp, O. V., & Vanman, E. J. (2012). Face age and sex modulate the other-race effect in face recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1712–1231.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0359-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wheaton, E. M., Schauer, E. D., & Galli, T. V. (2010). Economics of human trafficking. International Migration, 48(4), 114–141.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00592.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. White, B. A. (2014). Who cares when nobody is watching? Psychopathic traits and empathy in prosocial behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 116–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wiese, H. (2012). The role of age and ethnic group in face recognition memory: ERP evidence from a combined own-age and own-race bias study. Biological Psychology, 89(1), 137–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Wiese, H., Komes, J., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2013). Ageing faces in ageing minds: A review on the own-age bias in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 21(9-10), 1337–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.823139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wiese, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2018). Inequality between biases in face memory: Event-related potentials reveal dissociable neural correlates of own-race and own-gender biases. Cortex, 101, 119–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Wiese, H., Schweinberger, S. R., & Hansen, K. (2008). The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2973–2985.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Clark, S. E., Dunn, J. C., & Wells, W. (2016). Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 304–309.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516814112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Wright, D. B., & Stroud, J. S. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 641–654.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020981501383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Zahn-Waxler, C., & Smith, K. D. (1992). The development of Prosocial behavior. In V. B. Van Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of social development. Perspectives in Developmental Psychology. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mississippi State UniversityNorth MeridianUSA
  2. 2.Mississippi State UniversityWarrensburgUSA

Personalised recommendations