Advertisement

The DRM paradigm in sign language: An investigation of associative memory errors in deaf and hearing signers

  • Joanna UlatowskaEmail author
  • Justyna Olszewska
  • Dominika Wiśniewska
  • Tomasz Rogowski
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

There is a lack of research investigating associative memory errors in sign language. Thus, the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm was used to test recall and recognition errors in deaf signers following four types of encoding: written words, signs, written words presented along with signs, or written words combined with self-produced signs. The results revealed poor memory for studied material along with a relatively low level of false memory for critical items. However, dual coding appeared to enhance veridical memory. Interestingly, a high rate of noncritical intrusions was noticed across all four encoding conditions. Similar results were obtained for recognition, however, there were no differences between encoding conditions in the false alarms rate toward critical lures. The results point to difficulties in accessing the meaning of words in deaf participants. To test this hypothesis a follow-up study was conducted where false recall and recognition of words or signs were tested in hearing participants fluent in sign language. The second experiment revealed semantic memory errors comparable to previous studies with hearing participants. The results from both experiments are discussed in light of previous studies on vocabulary knowledge in deaf individuals.

Keywords

Sign language Deaf people The DRM paradigm False recall False recognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by The National Science Centre Grant DEC-2011/01/D/HS6/05482.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at The Maria Grzegrzewska University. The manuscript is original, not previously published, and not under concurrent consideration elsewhere. We confirm that the informed consent was granted by the participants and that they were debriefed.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Akamatsu, C. T., & Fischer, S. D. (1991). Using immediate recall to assess language proficiency in deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 136, 428–434.  https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.0425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90201-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. C., & Ortony, A. (1975). On putting apples into bottles - a problem in polysemy. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 167–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90008-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anisfield, M., & Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 171–179.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arndt, J., & Reder, L. M. (2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00518-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnedt, S. C., & Gentile, R. (1986). A test of dual coding theory for bilingual memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 290–299.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkins, A. S., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2008). False working memories? Semantic distortion in a mere 4 seconds. Memory & Cognition, 36, 74–81.  https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.1.74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhatt, R., Laws, K. R., & McKenna, P. J. (2010). False memory in schizophrenia patients with and without delusions. Psychiatry Research, 178, 260–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.02.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Kneer, R. (1995). False recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 157–185.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brainerd, C. J., Yang, Y., Reyna, V. F., Howe, M. L., & Mills, B. A. (2008). Semantic processing in “associative” false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1035–1053.  https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.15.6.1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, L., & Grosjean, F. (1982). Sign recognition processes in American sign language: The effect of context. Language and Speech, 25, 325–340.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098202500402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.82.6.407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s00225371(69)80069-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coppens, K. M., Tellings, A., Verhoeven, L., & Schreuder, R. (2013). Reading vocabulary in children with and without hearing loss: The roles of task and word type. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 654–666.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0138).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046671.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The educational psychology series. Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 249–275). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Emmorey, K. (2007). The psycholinguistics of signed and spoken languages: How biology affects processing. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 703–721). New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fagan, M. K., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Hearing experience and receptive vocabulary development in deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15, 149–161.  https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enq001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gallo, D. A., Roberts, M. J., & Seamon, J. G. (1997). Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 271–276.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03209405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., & Roediger III, H. L. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 339–353.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.27.2.339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18, 23–30.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03202642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardiner, J. M., Ramponi, C., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1998). Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1997.0321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gold, R., & Segal, O. (2017). Metaphor comprehension by deaf young adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22, 316–325.  https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguistics, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 3–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(89)90048-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingualism, biculturalism, and deafness. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(2), 133–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903474051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hiddinga, H. J., & Crasborn, O. (2011). Signed languages and globalization. Language in Society, 40, 483–505.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404511000480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joormann, J., Teachman, B. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Sadder and less accurate? False memory for negative material in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 412–417.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015621.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Koutstaal, W. (2003). Older adults encode–but do not always use–perceptual details: Intentional versus unintentional effects of detail on memory judgments. Psychological Science, 14, 189–193.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Koutstaal, W., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 555–583.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lederberg, A. R., & Spencer, P. E. (2001). Vocabulary development of young deaf and hard of hearing children. In M. D. Clark, M. Marschark, & M. Karchmer (Eds.), Context, cognition, and deafness (pp. 73–92). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Liberman, A. M., Borovsky, A., Hatrak, M., & Mayberry, R. I. (2015). Real time processing of ASL: Delayed first language acquisition affects organization of the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1130–1139.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacLeod, C. M., & Bodner, G. E. (2017). The production effect in memory. Psychological Science, 26, 390–395.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417691356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marmolejo, G., Diliberto-Macaluso, K., & Altarriba, J. (2009). False memory in bilinguals: Does switching languages increase false memories? The American Journal of Psychology, 122, 1–16 https://www.jstor.org/stable/27784371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Marschark, M. (1993). Psychological development of deaf children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Marschark, M., & Everhart, V. S. (1999). Problem solving by hearing impaired and hearing children: Twenty questions. Hearing Impairment and Education International, 1, 65–82.  https://doi.org/10.1179/146431599790561370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marschark, M., & Wauters, L. (2008). Language comprehension and learning by deaf students. In M. Marschark & P. C. Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition: Foundations and outcomes (pp. 309–350). New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.003.0012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., McEvoy, C., & Masteller, A. (2004). Organization and use of the mental lexicon by deaf and hearing individuals. American Annals of the Deaf, 149, 51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2004.0013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Marschark, M., Shaver, D. M., Nagle, K. M., & Newman, L. (2015). Predicting the academic achievement of deaf and hard-of-hearing students from individual, household, communication, and educational factors. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 350–369.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Mazzoni, G. (2002). Naturally occurring and suggestion-dependent memory distortions: Convergence of disparate research traditions. European Psychologist, 7, 17–30.  https://doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.7.1.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McDermott, K. B., & Roediger III, H. L. (1998). Attempting to avoid illusory memories: Robust false recognition of associates persists under conditions of explicit warnings and immediate testing. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 508–520.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McEvoy, C., Marschark, M., & Nelson, D. L. (1999). Comparing the mental lexicons of deaf and hearing individuals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 311–320.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McGeown, S. P., Gray, E. A., Robinson, J. L., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2014). What factors underline children’s susceptibility to semantic and phonological false memories? Investigating the roles of language skills and auditory short-term memory. Cognition, 131, 323–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Morford, J. P., Wilkinson, E., Villwock, A., Piñar, P., & Kroll, J. F. (2011). When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations? Cognition, 118, 286–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Olszewska, J., & Ulatowska, J. (2013). Encoding strategy affects false recall and recognition: Evidence from categorical study material. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9, 44–52.  https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0130-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Orfanidou, E., Adam, R., McQueen, J. M., & Morgan, G. (2009). Making sense of nonsense in British sign language (BSL): The contribution of different phonological parameters to sign recognition. Memory & Cognition, 37, 302–315.  https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.37.3.302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ozubko, J. D., Hourihan, K. L., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Production benefits learning: The production effect endures and improves memory for text. Memory, 20, 717–727.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.699070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.003.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paivio, A. (2014). Bilingual dual coding theory and memory. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Foundations of bilingual memory (pp. 41–62). New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9218-4_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paivio, A., Clark, J., & Lambert, W. (1988). Bilingual dual-coding theory and semantic repetition effects on recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 163–172.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.14.1.163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paul, P. (1996). Reading vocabulary knowledge and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 3–15.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Paul, P. (2009). Language and deafness (4th ed.). Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Prezbindowski, A., & Lederberg, A. (2003). Vocabulary assessment of deaf and hard-of-hearing children from infancy through the preschool years. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 383–400.  https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eng031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Quillian, M. R. (1967). Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behavioral Science, 12(5), 410–430.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830120511.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic distance. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80056-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roediger III, H. L., & McDermott, K. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roediger III, H. L., Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., & Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 385–407.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roediger III, H. L., McDermott, K. B., Pisoni, D. P., & Gallo, D. A. (2004). Illusory recollection of voices. Memory, 12, 586–602.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Rose, S., McAnally, P., & Quigley, S. P. (2004). Language development practices with deaf children (3rd ed.). Austin: Pro-Ed.  https://doi.org/10.1177/02656590080240010603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sahlin, B. H., Harding, M. G., & Seamon, S. G. (2005). When do false memories cross language boundaries in English–Spanish bilinguals? Memory & Cognition, 33, 1414–1421.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schembri, A., & Johnston, T. (2007). Sociolinguistic variation in the use of fingerspelling in Australian sign language: A pilot study. Sign Language Studies, 7, 319–347.  https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2007.0019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schembri, A., McKee, D., McKee, R., Johnston, T., & Goswell, D. (2009). Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand sign languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change, 21, 193–231.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394509990081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schirmer, B. (2000). Language and literacy development in children who are deaf. New York: Merrill.Google Scholar
  67. Shand, M. A. (1982). Sign-based short-term coding of American sign language signs and printed English words by congenitally deaf signers. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90002-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2010). Language processing in bimodal bilinguals: Cognition, education, and language processing. In E. F. Caldwell (Ed.), Bilinguals: Cognition, education, and language processing (pp. 35–64). Hauppauge: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  69. Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2012). Bimodal bilinguals co-activate both languages during spoken comprehension. Cognition, 124(3), 314–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 710–715.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1997). Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 5–42.  https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Smith, R. E., Lozito, J. P., & Bayen, U. J. (2005). Adult age differences in distinctive processing: The modality effect on false recall. Psychology and Aging, 20, 486–492.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., & Gallagher, M. P. (2008). The effect of study modality on false recognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1439–1449.  https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.8.1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.117.1.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spencer, P. E., & Lederberg, A. R. (1997). Different modes, different models: Communication and language of young deaf children and their mothers. In L. B. Adamson & M. A. Romski (Eds.), Communication and language acquisition: Discoveries from atypical development (pp. 203–230). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  76. Stamp, R. (2016). Do signers understand regional varieties of a sign language? A lexical recognition experiment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21, 83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/env044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Stamp, R., Schembri, A., Fenlon, J., Rentelis, R., Woll, B., & Cormier, K. (2014). Lexical variation and change in British sign language. PLoS One, 9(4), e94053.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094053.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Trezek, B., Wang, Y., & Paul, P. (2010). Processes and components of reading. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190241414.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ulatowska, J., & Olszewska, J. (2013). Creating associative memory distortions - a polish adaptation of the DRM paradigm. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44, 449–456.  https://doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2013-0048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122–129.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Villameriel, S., Dias, P., Costello, B., & Carreiras, M. (2016). Cross-language and cross-modal activation in hearing bimodal bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 59–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weekes, B. S., Hamilton, S., Oakhill, J., & Holliday, R. E. (2008). False recollection in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Cognition, 106, 222–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2002.2864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyNicolaus Copernicus UniversityToruńPoland
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of Wisconsin-OshkoshOshkoshUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologySWPS University of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland
  4. 4.Institute of PsychologyThe Maria Grzegorzewska UniversityWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations