Advertisement

‘Coming out’ across cultures: Examining the experiences of Ecuadorian and Spanish LGB employees

  • Sara CorlettEmail author
  • Donatella Di Marco
  • Alicia Arenas
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) employees use the invisible character of their sexual identity to adopt strategies that reveal or hide their sexual orientation at work. Previous research has focused on environmental and individual factors that play a role in the disclosure process of LGB employees, yet cultural factors that may also impact this process have remained practically ignored in the literature. In this study we analyze the disclosure process of 15 Spanish and 15 Ecuadorian LGB individuals through in-depth semi-structured interviews. The results suggest that some cultural elements in each country, such as religion and gender role norms, make the experiences of the participants dissimilar. The consequences of adopting different disclosure strategies have been found for both the individual (e.g., relationship with colleagues, well-being) and organizations (e.g., performance). This study highlights the need for research to find effective measures to include LGB people in organizations and encourages researchers to adopt a cultural approach when studying the process of disclosure at work.

Keywords

Culture Discrimination Gender roles Disclosure Diversity Workplace 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO/FEDER), under Grant number PSI2015-64894-P and by the Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal, under Grant number SFRH/BPD/121748/2016.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agencia Tributaria. (2018). La asignación a la Iglesia Católica en los informes de recaudación [the assignment to the Catholic Church in the income reports]. Retrieved from https://www.agenciatributaria.es/static_files/AEAT/Estudios/Estadisticas/Informes_Estadisticos/Informes_Anuales_de_Recaudacion_Tributaria/Ejercicio_2018/Nota1.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.
  2. Allen, T. D. (2013). The work–family role Interface: A synthesis of the research from industrial and organizational psychology. In I. B. Weiner, N. W. Schmitt, & S. Highhouse (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 698–718).  https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3183.8086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton, B. (2010). “Abomination”-life as a Bible Belt gay. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(4), 465–484.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00918361003608558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boehm, S. A., Dwertmann, D. J., Kunze, F., Michaelis, B., Parks, K. M., & McDonald, D. P. (2014). Expanding insights on the diversity climate–performance link: The role of workgroup discrimination and group size. Human Resource Management, 53(3), 379–402.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borraz, M. (2018). Tu novia es "tu amiga especial" o la confusión del recepcionista: la homofobia sutil que la ley no combate [your girlfriend is your ‘special friend’ or the receptionists’ confusion: Subtle homophobia that the law does not tackle]. Eldiario.es. Retrieved from https://www.eldiario.es/sociedad/novia-especial-reservar-matrimonio-homofobia_0_738076520.html. Accessed 14 May 2019.
  6. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2018). Barómetro de febrero 2018 [February 2018 Barometer]. Retrieved from http://datos.cis.es/pdf/Es3205mar_A.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.
  7. Clair, J. A., Beatty, J. E., & MacLean, T. L. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 78–95.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.27745097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuddy, A. J. C., Wolf, E. B., Glick, P., Crotty, S., Chong, J., & Norton, M. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 622–635.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Marco, D., Hoel, H., Arenas, A., & Munduate, L. (2018). Workplace incivility as modern sexual prejudice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(12), 1978–2004.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515621083.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Marco, D., Arenas, A., Hoel, H., & Munduate, L. (in press). Living a double life and experiencing modern sexual prejudice: the effect on Ecuadorian lesbian, gay and bisexual workers’ well-being. In N. Nakamura & C. Loggie (Eds.), LGBT mental health: global perspectives and experiences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  12. Dovidio, J. F. (2001). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The third wave. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 829–849.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 275–298.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2015). Discrimination in the EU in 2015. Special Eurobarometer 437. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/factsheet_eurobarometer_fundamental_rights_2015.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.
  15. Galeano, J. F. (2016). Is he a “social danger”?: The Franco Regime’s judicial prosecution of homosexuality in Málaga under the ley de Vagos y Maleantes. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 25(1), 1–31.  https://doi.org/10.7560/jhs25101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Gómez, M., Barmettler, D., Cadena, M. R., Puente, D., Padilla, S., Santamaría, L., ... & García, K. (2013). Estudio de caso sobre condiciones de vida, inclusión social y cumplimiento de derechos humanos de la población LGBTI en el Ecuador [Case study on living conditions, social inclusion, and compliance with human rights of the LGBTI population in Ecuador]. Quito, Ecuador: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Retrieved from: https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/Estadisticas_Sociales/LGBTI/Analisis_situacion_LGBTI.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.
  18. Griffin, P. (1992). From hiding out to coming out: Empowering lesbian and gay educators. Journal of Homosexuality, 22(3–4), 167–196. New York: Harrington Park Press. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v22n03_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffith, K. H., & Hebl, M. R. (2002). The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: "coming out" at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1191–1199.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P., & Spielberger, C. (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herrell, R. K. (1996). Sin, sickness, crime: Queer desire and the American state. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 2(3), 273–300.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hinze, C. F. (2016). Catholic social thought and work justice. Theological Studies, 77(1), 197–214.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040563915620785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2017). Mujeres y hombres en España [Women and men in Spain]. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es/ss/Satellite?L=es_ES&c=INEPublicacion_C&cid=1259924822888&p=1254735110672&pagename=ProductosYServicios%2FPYSLayout&param1=PYSDetalleGratuitas. Accessed 14 May 2019.
  24. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. (2012). Primeras estadísticas oficiales sobre filiación religiosa en el Ecuador [First official statistical data on religious affiliation in Ecuador]. Retrieved from http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec//wp-content/descargas/Boletines/Religion/presentacion_religion.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.
  25. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. (2018). Atlas de Género [Gender Atlas]. Retrieved from http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/Bibliotecas/Libros/Atlas_de_Genero_Final.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.
  26. International Test Commission [ITC]. (2005). Guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Retrieved from: https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2019.
  27. Jones, K. P., Peddie, C. I., Gilrane, V. L., King, E. B., & Gray, A. L. (2016). Not so subtle: A meta-analytic investigation of the correlates of subtle and overt discrimination. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1588–1613.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313506466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376–407.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. King, N. (2004a). Using interviews in qualitative research. In C. C. En & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 11–22). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. King, N. (2004b). Using templates in thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassel & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). London: SAGE.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Law n. 13. (2005). Modificación del Código Civil en materia de derecho a contraer matrimonio. [modification of the civil code in terms of the right of marriage]. Madrid, Spain, 1st July 2005.Google Scholar
  32. Law n. 15. (2005). Modificación del Código Civil y la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil en materia de separación y divorcio. [modification of the civil code and the law of civil procedure in terms of divorce]. Madrid, Spain, 8th July 2005.Google Scholar
  33. Mealy, M., Stephan, W. G., & Abalakina-Paap, M. (2006). Reverence for mothers in Ecuadorian and euro-American culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(4), 465–484.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106288481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80231-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prati, G., & Pietrantoni, L. (2014). Coming out and job satisfaction: A moderated mediation model. Career Development Quarterly, 62(4), 358–371.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00088.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ragins, B. R. (2008). Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Academy of Management Review, 33, 194–215.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.27752724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ragins, B. R., Singh, R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2007). Making the invisible visible: Fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1103–1118.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rheineck, J., Wise, S. M., & Williams, J. D. (2016). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. In W. K. Killam, S. Degges-White, & R. E. Michel (Eds.), Career counseling interventions: Practice with diverse clients (pp. 117–127). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  39. Sirin, S., McCreary, D., & Mahalik, J. (2004). Differential reactions to men and women's gender role transgressions: Perceptions of social status, sexual orientation, and value dissimilarity. The Journal of Men's Studies, 12(2), 119–132.  https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1202.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stevens, E. P., & Pescatello, A. (1973). Marianismo: The other face of machismo in Latin America (pp. 89–101). University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ward, J., & Winstanley, D. (2005). Coming out at work: Performativity and the recognition and renegotiation of identity. The Sociological Review, 53(3), 447–475.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00561.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wax, A., Coletti, K. K., & Ogaz, J. W. (2017). The benefit of full disclosure: A meta-analysis of the implications of coming out at work. Organizational Psychology Review, 8(1), 3–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386617734582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Webster, J. R., Adams, G. A., Maranto, C. L., Sawyer, K., & Thoroughgood, C. (2018). Workplace contextual supports for LGBT employees: A review, meta-analysis, and agenda for future research. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 193–210.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, C. L., Giuffre, P. A., & Dellinger, K. (2009). The gay-friendly closet. Sexuality Research and Social Policies, 6(1), 29–45.  https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2009.6.1.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Young, P. D. (2000). Same-sex relationships, religious traditions, marriage, and the law. Sciences Religieuses, 29(4), 465–480.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000842980002900406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social PsychologyUniversity of SevillaSevillaSpain
  2. 2.Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL)Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL)LisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations