Advertisement

Relationship between dark triad personality traits and work values among athletes

  • Gokhan Caliskan
  • Arif ÖzerEmail author
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review the relationship between dark personality traits and work values in athletes. In total, 261 athletes from various universities in Turkey (179 male and 82 female) voluntarily participated in this study. The participants were administered two scales: the Turkish versions of the Work Values Inventory and the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen. Canonical correlation analysis was used to explore the correlations among variables in the work values and dark personality datasets. The results revealed a negative correlation between work values and the presence of dark personality characteristics. Creativity and achievement were key variables with the largest contribution to the first canonical root in the work values set. Similarly, the variables with the largest contribution to the first canonical root in the dark personality set were Machiavellianism and psychopathy. In addition, achievement and prestige in the work values set and narcissism and psychopathy in the dark personality set were correlated with the second canonical root. While creativity and achievement were negatively correlated with Machiavellianism and psychopathy, narcissism was positively related to prestige and achievement.

Keywords

Work values Personality Narcissism Machiavellianism Psychopathy Canonical correlation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent forms were signed by all the participants included in the study.

References

  1. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 111–118.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtson, V. L., & Lovejoy, M. C. (1973). Values, personality, and social structure: An intergenerational analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(6), 880–912.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427301600605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benning, S. D., Patrick, C. J., Hicks, B. M., Blonigen, D. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2003). Factor structure of the psychopathic personality inventory: Validity and implications for clinical assessment. Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 340–350.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.3.340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berings, D., De Fruyt, F., & Bouwen, R. (2004). Work values and personality traits as predictors of enterprising and social vocational interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(2), 349–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00101-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilsky, W., & Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journa1 of Personality, 8(3), 163–181.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blais, J., & Pruysers, S. (2017). The power of the dark side: Personality, the dark triad, and political ambition. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 167–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cruickshank, A., & Collins, D. (2015). Illuminating and applying “the dark side”: Insights from elite team leaders. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 27(3), 249–267.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2014.982771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DePaulo, B. M., DePaulo, B., & Wilson, L. (Eds.). (2010). The psychology of Dexter. BenBella Books. ISO 690Google Scholar
  9. Duffy, R. D., Borges, N. J., & Hartung, P. J. (2009). Personality, vocational interests, and work values of medical students. Journal of Career Assessment, 17(2), 189–200.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072708329035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furnham, A. (1984). Personality and values. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 483–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(84)90018-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furnham, A., & MacRae, I. (2018). The dark side of work values. Current Psychology, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9873-z.
  12. Furnham, A., & Pendleton, D. (2016). Dark side traits at work: Bright and dark side traits and job value preferences. Psychology, 7(5), 721–732.  https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.75075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Ferrari, K. (1999). Personality and work motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(6), 1035–1043.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00202-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furnham, A., Hyde, G., & Trickey, G. (2014). The dark side of career preference: Dark side traits, motives, and values. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(2), 106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammond, M. S., Betz, N. E., Multon, K. D., & Irvin, T. (2010). Super’s work values inventory-revised scale validation for African Americans. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(3), 266–275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710364792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), big five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 686–690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jonason, P. K., Richardson, E. N., & Potter, L. (2015). Self-reported creative ability and the dark triad traits: An exploratory study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 488–494.  https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonason, P. K., Abboud, R., Tomé, J., Dummett, M., & Hazer, A. (2017). The dark triad traits and individual differences in self-reported and other-rated creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 150–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. (1992). Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 261–271.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kavussanu, M. (2019). Understanding athletes’ transgressive behavior: Progress and prospects. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 42, 33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kerr, B. A. (2014). Career counseling laboratories: Integrating values into career counseling with gifted and talented students. In M. Pope, L. Flores, & P. Rottinghaus (Eds.), The role of values in careers (pp. 245–268). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Korkut-Owen, F. & Niles, S. G. (2014). Yeni yaklaşım ve modeller [New approaches and models]. In B. Yeşilyaprak (Ed.), Mesleki rehberlik ve kariyer danışmanlığı: kuramdan uygulamaya (pp. 274–305) [Occupational guidance and career counseling: From theory to application]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Yayınları.Google Scholar
  26. Kubat, U., & Kuruüzüm, A. (2010). İş değerleri ile kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkini incelenmesi: Bir yapısal denklem modelleme yaklaşımı [An examination of the relationship between work values and personality traits: A structural equation modeling approach]. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(3), 487–505.Google Scholar
  27. Martin, L. (2016). Sports performance measurement and analytics: The science of assessing performance, predicting future outcomes, interpreting statistical models, and evaluating the market value of athletes. New Jersey: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, J. D., Gaughan, E. T., & Pryor, L. R. (2008). The Levenson self-report psychopathy scale: An examination of the personality traits and disorders associated with the LSRP factors. Assessment, 15(4), 450–463.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191108316888.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Molm, L. (2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119–131.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510369079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Oluf, G. A., & Furnham, A. (2015). The relationship between bright- and dark-side personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 206–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Özsoy, E., Rauthmann, J. F., Jonason, P. K., & Ardıç, K. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD-T), short dark triad (SD3-T), and single item narcissism scale (SINS-T). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 11–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pilavcı, D. (2007). Bilgi çağında değişen kariyer anlayışı ve üniversite öğrencilerinin kariyer tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler üzerine bir uygulama [Evolving and changing career concept in the information age, and an investigation of the factors influencing the career preferences of undergraduates] Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi [unpublished master’s thesis]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı.Google Scholar
  34. Roberts, R., Cooke, A., Woodman, T., Hupfeld, H., Barwood, C., & Manley, H. (2019). When the going gets tough, who gets going? An examination of the relationship between narcissism, effort, and performance. Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology, 8(1), 93–105.  https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789–801.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2014). In M. Pope, L. Flores, & P. Rottinghaus (Eds.), The role of values in careers Integrating values and interests for career counseling. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & LeBreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 41–60.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Super, D. E. (1970). Work values inventory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mimin.Google Scholar
  39. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Tazegül, Ü., Soykan, A., & Sancakli, H. (2013). Investigating the relationship between narcissism and motivation level of wrestlers. Global Advanced Research Journal of Social Science, 2(5), 27–33.Google Scholar
  41. Ueno, Y., Shimotsukasa, T., Suyama, S., & Oshio, A. (2017). Correlations between competitive sports’ characteristics and the dark triad. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17(2), 533–536.  https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.02080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Volmer, J., Koch, I. K., & Göritz, A. S. (2016). The bright and dark sides of leaders’ dark triad traits: Effects on subordinates’ career success and well–being. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 413–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Watson, J. C., & Flamez, B. (2015). Counseling assessment and evaluation: Fundamentals of applied practice (counseling and professional identity). Los Angeles: Sage Publication Inc.Google Scholar
  44. Weinberg, R. S. W., & Gould, D. (1999). Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology: Study Guide. Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  45. Wooden, J.R. and Carty, J. (2005). Coach Wooden’s Pyramid of Success, Building Blocks of Life for a Better Life, Regal Books, Ventura, California.Google Scholar
  46. Zytowski, D. G. (1994). A super contribution to vocational theory: Work values. The Career Development Quarterly, 43(1), 25–31.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1994.tb00843.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physical Education and SportsIgdir UniversityIgdirTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Department of Educational SciencesHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations