Advertisement

Investigating the measurement structure of the Turkish version of the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale-9

  • Cahit KayaEmail author
  • Fong Chan
  • Dana Brickham
  • Mickey Allen
  • Enver Sarı
  • Mustafa Şanal
  • Temel Topal
Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

The Turkish version of the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale-9 (DAS-9) items assesses an individual’s level of endorsement of dysfunctional attitudes associated with depression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factorial reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the DAS-9. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and the MIMIC model were used to investigate the psychometric properties of the DAS-9. The exploratory factor analysis results indicated a two-factor structure: (a) personal/internal rigid thoughts, and (b) dysfunctional thoughts involving other people and the external world. Participants at a high risk for depression endorsed the factor scores significantly higher than participants at a lower risk. Overall, the results suggest that the scale is a reliable and valid measure that can be used by clinicians and researchers to measure level of dysfunctional attitudes.

Keywords

Dysfunctional attitudes Depression Factor analysis College students 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12144_2019_252_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Melalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96, 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, J. A., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Hops, H. (1993). Psychometric properties of scales for the measurement of psychosocial variables associated with depression in adolescence. Psychological Reports, 73, 1019–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aydın, G. (1988). Depresyonda bilişsel değerlendirme: DBYO yetişkin formunun klinik geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Turkish Journal of Neurology, Neuro Surgery, and Psychiatry, 3, 135–139.Google Scholar
  4. Batmaz, S., & Ozdel, K. (2016). Psychometric properties of the revised and abbreviated form of the Turkish version of the dysfunctional attitude scale. Psychological Reports, 118(1), 180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T. (1964). Thinking and depression: 2. Theory and therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 9, 324–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beevers, C. G., Strong, D. R., Meyer, B., Pilkonis, P. A., & Miller, I. W. (2007). Efficiently assessing negative cognition in depression: An item response theory analysis of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 199–209.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilgel, N., & Bayram, N. (2010). Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-42): Psychometric properties. Archives of Neuropsychiatry/Noropsikiatri Arsivi, 47(2).Google Scholar
  9. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Catell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Çorapçioglu, A., & Özer, G. U. (2004). Adaptation of revised Brief PHQ (Brief-PHQ-r) for diagnosis of depression, panic disorder and somatoform disorder in primary healthcare settings. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 8(1), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 99(3), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eremsoy, C. E., Çelimli, Ş., & Gençöz, T. (2005). Students under academic stress in a Turkish University: Variables associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Current Psychology, 24(2), 123-133.Google Scholar
  15. Everitt, B. S. (1975). Multivariate analysis: The need for data, and other problems. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 126(3), 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg, J. F., Gerstein, R. K., Wenze, S. J., Welker, T. M., & Beck, A. T. (2008). Dysfunctional attitudes and cognitive schemas in bipolar manic and unipolar depressed outpatients: Implications for cognitively based psychotherapeutics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196(3), 207–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graaf, L. E., Roelofs, J., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2009). Measuring dysfunctional attitudes in the general population: The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Form A) Revised. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33(4), 345–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9229-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Hamilton, E. W., & Abramson, L. Y. (1983). Cognitive patterns and major depressive disorder: A longitudinal study in a hospital setting. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92(2), 173–184.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.92.2.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hankin, B. L. (2009). Development of sex differences in depressive and co-occurring anxious symptoms during adolescence: Descriptive trajectories and potential explanations in a multiwave prospective study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38(4), 460–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hovardaoğlu, S. (1986). Öğrenilmiş çaresizlik modeli. Psikoloji Dergisi, 5(20), 3–8.Google Scholar
  24. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  25. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.Google Scholar
  26. IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (version 24.0) [software]. Armonk: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  27. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaya, C., Tansey, T., Chan, F., Bezyak, J., Melekoğlu, M. A., Çakıroğlu, O., & Köse, S. (2015). Dimensionality of the Turkish version of the Self-Stigma of Seeking Help Scale: Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 37(2), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaya, C., Tansey, T. N., Melekoglu, M., Cakiroglu, O., & Chan, F. (2017). Psychometric evaluation of Turkish version of the Perceived Stress Scale with Turkish college students. Journal of Mental Health, 1–7.Google Scholar
  31. Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R., et al. (2003). The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(23), 3095–3105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kline, P. (1979). Psychometrics and psychology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Konkan, R., Senormanci, O., Guclu, O., Aydin, E., & Sungur, M. Z. (2013). Validity and reliability study for the Turkish adaptation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale/Yaygin Anksiyete Bozuklugu-7 (YAB-7) testi Turkce uyarlamasi, gecerlik ve guvenirligi. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 50(1), 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R., Williams, J., Monahan, P., & Löwe, B. (2007). Anxiety disorders in primary care: Prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(5), 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, E. J., Chan, F., Chronister, J., Chan, J. C. Y., & Romero, M. (2009). Models, research, and treatment of co-existing depression for people with chronic illness and disability. In F. Chan, E. Cardoso, & J. Chronister (Eds.), Psychosocial interventions for people with chronic illness and disability: A handbook for evidence-based rehabilitation health professionals (pp. 75–100). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  37. Lewinsohn, P. M., Joiner, T. E., Jr., & Rohde, P. (2001). Evaluation of cognitive diathesis-stress models in predicting major depressive disorder in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(2), 203–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843X.110.2.203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mann, R., & Beech, A. R. (2003). Cognitive distortions, schemas and implicit theories. In T. Ward, D. R. Laws, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), Theoretical issues and controversies in sexual deviance (pp. 135–153). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olinger, L. J., Kuiper, N. A., & Shaw, B. F. (1987). Dysfunctional attitudes and stressful life events: An interactive model of depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Şahin, N. H., & Batıgün, A. D. (2016). Fonksiyonel Olmayan Tutumlar Ölçeği Kısa Formu (FOTÖ-17) Uyarlama Çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19, 91–99.Google Scholar
  42. Şahin, N. H., & Şahin, N. (1992). How dysfunctional are the dysfunctional attitudes in another culture? British Journal of Medical Psychology, 65(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shapero, B. G., Black, S. K., Liu, R. T., Klugman, J., Bender, R. E., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (2014). Stressful life events and depression symptoms: The effect of childhood emotional abuse on stress reactivity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(3), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simons, C., Aysan, F., Thompson, D., Hamarat, E., & Steele, D. (2002). Coping resource availability and level of perceived stress as predictors of life satisfaction in a cohort of Turkish college students. College Student Journal, 36(1), 129–142.Google Scholar
  45. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Towbes, L. C., & Cohen, L. H. (1996). Chronic stress in the lives of college students: Scale development and prospective prediction of distress. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25(2), 199-217.Google Scholar
  47. Weissman, A. (1979). Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale: A validation study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  48. Wenzel, A. (2012). Modification of core beliefs in cognitive therapy. In standard and innovative strategies in cognitive behavior therapy. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.5772/30119. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/standard-and-innovative-strategiesin-cognitive-behavior-therapy/modification-of-core-beliefs-in-cognitivetherapy
  49. Weston, R., Gore, P. A., Jr., Chan, F., & Catalano, D. (2008). An introduction to using structural equation models in rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53(3), 340–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Giresun UniversityGiresunTurkey
  2. 2.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Western Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA
  4. 4.Spectrum Rehabilitation and CounselingTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations