An experimental study of the effect of rumination processing modes on approach behavior in a task involving previous failure
- 17 Downloads
Previous studies have found that rumination involves thoughts that usually occur during and influence affect after experiencing failure. However, little is known about how rumination directly affects approach behavior beyond that point. Therefore, we investigated the effects of rumination on approach behavior after failure. Forty-nine university students were allocated to one of either an abstract or concrete processing mode of rumination or a control condition. A failure experience was induced through a creative thinking task, and rumination was either manipulated or not depending on the group. The students then performed a task that was similar to the failure-inducing creative thinking task. Our analysis revealed that only the concrete processing mode of rumination improved participants’ negative affect and that the manipulation of rumination ultimately did not influence approach behavior after experiencing failure.
KeywordsRumination Approach behavior Processing modes Depression
This research was supported in part by grant from the Hiroshima University Education and Research Support Foundation. The authors thank all of their colleagues who assisted in this study. We are grateful to Dr. Natalie J Ciarocco for her advice in this study and providing us some materials.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2016). Self-regulation of action and affect. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 3–23). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kambara, K., Ogata, A., & Kira, Y. (2017). Effects of rumination processing modes on the tendency to avoid failure. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9655-z.
- Kojima, M., & Furukawa, T. (2003). Japanese version of the Beck depression inventory (2nd ed.). Tokyo: Nippon Hyoronsha.Google Scholar
- Kulkarni, A. A., & Yuan, H. (2017). Construal-level mindsets enhance behavioral persistence in response to incentive valence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2020.
- Martel, C. R., Addis, M. E., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001). Depression in context: Strategies for guided action. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Ruminative thoughts (pp. 1–47). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Takagaki, K., Okajima, I., Nakajima, S., Ishikawa, S., Kunisato, Y., Kanai, Y., & Sakano, Y. (2013). Preliminary assessment of the behavioral activation model in Japanese undergraduate students. Psychological Reports, 112, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.15.21.PR0.112.1.47-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi, Y., Yamagata, S., Kijima, N., Shigemasu, K., Ono, Y., & Ando, J. (2007). Gray’s temperament model: Development of Japanese version of BIS/BAS scales and a behavior genetic investigation using the twin method. The Japanese Journal of Personality, 15, 276–289. https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.15.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watkins E. R., Moberly N. J., &, Moulds M. L. (2008). Processing mode causally influences emotional reactivity: Distinct effects of abstract versus concrete construal on emotional response. Emotion, 8, 364–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-35220.127.116.114.