How to measure self-esteem with one item? validation of the German single-item self-esteem scale (G-SISE)
- 142 Downloads
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the German version of the Single-Item Self-Esteem Scale (G-SISE) is an appropriate instrument to measure the global self-esteem level. In three studies, the construct validity of G-SISE was analyzed. Study 1 (N = 522) found support for the convergence between G-SISE and the German Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (G-RSE), which is mostly used to assess the global self-esteem level. In Study 2a (N = 989), the associations between G-SISE, “Big Five” traits, subjective happiness and social support were analyzed. Results of Study 2b (N = 348) established the test-retest reliability of G-SISE over the time course of nine months. Taken together, the results show that the G-SISE is a valid, reliable and economical instrument for measuring the global self-esteem. Possible practical applications and limitations of G-SISE are discussed.
KeywordsSelf-esteem Measurement Validation Personality Mental health
The study was funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Professorship warded to Jürgen Margraf by the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
- Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1993). When ego threats lead to self-regulation failure: negative consequences of high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 141–156.Google Scholar
- Berry, J. W. (1989). Introduction to methodology. In H. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Bieda, A., Hirschfeld, G., Schonfeld, P., Brailovskaia, J., Zhang, X. C., & Margraf, J. (2016). Universal happiness? Cross-cultural measurement invariance of scales assessing positive mental health. Psychological Assessment, 29, 172–180.Google Scholar
- Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (2008). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (Vol. 2, neu normierte und vollständig überarbeitete Auflage). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Brailovskaia, J. (2013). Narzisstisch und sensationssuchend?: eine Studie zum Zusammenhang zwischen Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen und Online-Selbstdarstellung am Beispiel von studiVZ. Glückstadt: Hülsbusch.Google Scholar
- Brailovskaia, J., Bierhoff, H.-W., & Margraf, J. (2017a). How to identify narcissism with 13 items? Validation of the German narcissistic personality Inventory-13 (G-NPI-13). Assessment, https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117740625.
- Brailovskaia, J., Schönfeld, P., Kochetkov, Y., & Margraf, J. (2017b). What does migration mean to us? USA and Russia: Relationship Between Migration, Resilience, Social Support, Happiness, Life Satisfaction, Depression, Anxiety and Stress. Current Psychology, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. D. (2007). The self. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlsbaum.Google Scholar
- Ferring, D., & Filipp, S.-H. (1996). Messung des Selbstwertgefühls: Befunde zu Reliabilität, Validität und Stabilität der Rosenberg-Skala. Diagnostica, 42, 284–292.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Fydrich, T., Sommer, G., Tydecks, S., & Brähler, E. (2009). Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14). Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 18(1), 43–48.Google Scholar
- Goldsmith, R. E. (1986). Dimensionality of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1(2), 253–264.Google Scholar
- MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2012). Individual differences in self-esteem. Handbook of Self and Identity, 354–377.Google Scholar
- Margraf, J., & Schneider, S. (2017). Bochum optimism and mental health (BOOM) research program: Background, methods and aims. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Riordan, B. C., Cody, L., Flett, J. A. M., Conner, T. S., Hunterm, J., & Scarf, D. (2018). The development of a single item FoMO (fear of missing out) scale. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9824-8.
- Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolecent self-image. Princeton. In NJ: Princeton University press.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C., & Rosenberg, F. (1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 141–156.Google Scholar
- Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2003). Portraits of the self. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 110–138). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Suldo, S. M., & Shaffer, E. J. (2008). Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychology Review, 37(1), 52–68.Google Scholar
- Szrek, H., Chao, L.-W., Ramlagan, S., & Peltzer, K. (2012). Predicting (un)healthy behavior: A comparison of risk-taking propensity measures. Judgement and Decision Making, 1(6), 716–727.Google Scholar