Measuring Affective Responses to Cuteness and Japanese kawaii as a Multidimensional Construct
- 39 Downloads
The aim of this study was twofold: first to create a self-report scale that measures responsiveness to cuteness and kawaii in three key domains (baby animals, baby humans, and animate objects), and secondly to apply the measure to predicting parental attitudes toward corporal punishment. Currently, there are no self-report measures of this construct in theoretically consistent domains that encompass both cuteness and kawaii. In Study 1, a 15-item Cuteness Responsiveness (CR-15) scale was developed to assess responsiveness to infantile human and non-human kawaii creatures, which is defined as individual differences in the sensitivity to cuteness and readiness for a variety of caretaking behaviors. The CR-15 demonstrated evidence of good psychometric properties and fit into the three-factor structure. In Study 2, we recruited parents with a child/children under the age of 6 to test how responsiveness to cuteness affects parenting using the scale developed in Study 1. The results showed lower responsiveness to cuteness predicted parental approval for corporal punishment, and negative attitudes toward parenting mediated the link. Together, these studies demonstrate that the human baby subscale of the CR-15 can predict a tendency to experience positive emotions in response to infantile creatures and motivation for caretaking behaviors. Implications of cuteness/kawaii responses as a multidimensional construct and future directions are discussed.
KeywordsCuteness Baby schema effect Scale development Parenting
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Hiroshi Nittono who provided helpful comments on the conceptualization of kawaii as a positive emotion.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
There is no potential conflict of interest pertaining to this submission to Current Psychology.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
- Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 55–130). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Honda, S., Ishimaru, A., Utsunomiya, S., Yamane, T., Oda, M., Sakamoto, K., Ohe, Y., Kobayashi, H., Arima, T., Kidera, A., & Kosugi, K. (2016). Considering the relation between the Haidt’s moral foundation theory and Japanese morality through developing a new scale. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Yamaguchi University, 66, 95–106 Retrieved from http://www.lib.yamaguchi-u.ac.jp/yunoca/handle/C010066000311.Google Scholar
- Kadushin, A., & Martin, J. A. (1981). Interview study of abuse-event interaction. In A. Kadushin (Ed.), Child abuse: An interactional event (pp. 141–224). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Lehmann, V., Huisin’t Veld, E. M., & Vingerhoets, A. J. (2013). The human and animal baby schema effect: Correlates of individual differences. Behavioural Processes, 94, 99–108.Google Scholar
- Miesler, L., Leder, H., & Herrmann, A. (2011). Isn’t it cute: An evolutionary perspective of baby-schema effects in visual product designs. International Journal of Design, 5, 17–30.Google Scholar
- Milner, J. S., Rabenhorst, M. M., McCanne, T. R., Crouch, J. L., Skowronski, J. J., Fleming, M. T., Hiraoka, R., & Risser, H. J. (2011). Event-related potentials: Search for positive and negative child-related schemata in individuals at low ad high risk for child physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nittono, H. (2016). The two-layer model of “kawaii”: A behavioural science framework for understanding kawaii and cuteness. East Asian Journal of Popular Culture Retrieved from http://cplnet.jp/swfu/d/Nittono2016-Kawaii-review.pdf.
- Ohinata, M. (1988). Bosei no kenkyu (maternity research). Kawashima Shoten: Tokyo.Google Scholar
- Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In R. W. Robbins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Sakurai, S. (1988). The relationship between empathy and helping behavior in college students. Bulletin of Nara University of Education, 37, 1(Cultural and Social Science), 149–153.Google Scholar
- Sprengelmeyer, R., Perrett, D., Fagan, E. C., Cornwell, R. E., Lobmaier, J. S., Sprengelmeyer, A., Aasheim, H. B. M., Black, I. M., Cameron, L. M., Crow, S., Milne, N., Rhodes, E. C., & Young, A. W. (2009). The cutest little baby face: A hormonal link to sensitivity to cuteness in infant faces. Psychological Science, 20, 149–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stith, S. M., Liu, T., Davies, C., Boykin, E. L., Alder, M. C., Harris, J. M., Som, A., McPherson, M., & Dees, J. E. M. E. G. (2009). Risk factors in child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 13-29.Google Scholar
- Straus, M. A. (1994). Should the use of corporal punishment by parents be considered child abuse? Yes. In M. A. Mason & E. Gambrill (Eds.), Debating children’s lives: Current controversies on children and adolescents (pp. 197–203). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. (2012). Child abuse facts and implication for future policies. Retrieved from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kodomo/kodomo_kosodate/dv/about.html
- The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. (2015). Guidelines for the prevention of child abuse. Retrieved from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kodomo/dv12/00.html
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families. (2007). Child maltreatment 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- US Department of Health and Human Services (2010). Administration on Children, Youth and Families: Child Maltreatment 2008. Retrieved from: http://www.acf.hhs.gov.
- WHO - World Health Organization and International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. (2006). Preventing child maltreatment: A guide to taking action and generating evidence. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar
- Yano, C. R. (2013). Pink Globalization: Hello Kitty and Its Trek Across the Pacific. Durham. Duke University Press.Google Scholar