Relationship Between Emotional Expression Discrepancy and Life Satisfaction Across Culture and Personal Values

Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

People can experience a discrepancy between their ideal and actual emotions. We hypothesized that this emotional discrepancy would be associated with people’s life satisfaction, depending on their culture and individual emotional values. We tested this hypothesis across three cultures (the United States, Hungary, and South Korea) and three broad categories of personal values (hedonic, collaboration, and confrontation). Participants reported the levels of their ideal and actual expression of four discrete emotions (anger, excitement, empathy, and sadness), as well as their levels of life satisfaction and emotion-related personal values. A three-way interaction analysis revealed that the discrepancy in empathy expression (i.e., perceiving self as expressing more empathy than others in one’s culture) increased life satisfaction more among Americans with hedonic values than among Koreans with hedonic values. Furthermore, the discrepancy decreased life satisfaction among Hungarians with hedonic values. In addition, discrepancy in sadness (i.e., expressing more sadness than others) decreased life satisfaction less among Americans with collaboration value, while it decreased life satisfaction more in Koreans with collaboration value. In Hungary, the sadness discrepancy increased life satisfaction among people with collaboration value. Findings suggest that the association between emotional discrepancy and life satisfaction is moderated by both culture and personal values.

Keywords

Emotional discrepancy Expression Life satisfaction Culture Personal value 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Min Young Kim has received research grants from Keimyung University. Mohsen Joshanloo declares that he has no conflict of interest. Emese Foldesi declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

12144_2018_9826_MOESM1_ESM.doc (39 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 39 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, D. A., & Moses, L. J. (1996). The ontogeny of social information gathering. Child Development, 67, 1915–1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, L. F. (1996). Hedonic tone, perceived arousal, and item desirability: Three components of self-reported mood. Cognition and Emotion, 10(1), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, K. C., & Campos, J. J. (1987). Perspectives on emotional development: II: A functionalist approach to emotions. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed., pp. 555–578). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cassels, T. G., Chan, S., Chung, W., & Birch, S. A. J. (2010). The role of culture in affective empathy: Cultural and bicultural differences. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chopik, W. J., O’Brien, E., & Konrath, S. H. (2016). Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.Google Scholar
  11. De Rivera, J., & Páez, D. (2007). Emotional climate, human security, and cultures of peace. Journal of Social Issues, 63(2), 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter-and intranational differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 869–885.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford, B. Q., Dmitrieva, J. O., Heller, D., Chentsova-Dutton, Y., Grossmann, I., Tamir, M., Uchida, Y., Koopmann-Holm, B., Uhrig, M., Floerke, V., Bokhan, T., & Mauss, I. B. (2015). Culture shapes whether the pursuit of happiness predicts higher or lower well-being. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1053–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frijda, N. H. (1994). Emotions are functional, most of the time. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 112–122). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Georgas, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Berry, J. W. (2004). The ecocultural framework, ecosocial indices, and psychological variables in crosscultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 95–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hareli, S., Kafetsios, K., & Hess, U. (2015). A cross-cultural study on emotion expression and the learning of social norms. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuppens, P., Realo, A., & Diener, E. (2008). The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 66–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lynch, M. F., La Guardia, J. G., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). On being yourself in different cultures: Ideal and actual self-concept, autonomy support, and well-being in China, Russia, and the United States. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 290–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Fontaine, J. (2008a). Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Nakagawa, S. (2008b). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 925–937.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mauss, I. B., & Tamir, M. (2014). Emotion goals: How their content, structure, and operation shape emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), The handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 361–375). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, C. R., & Dymond, R. F. (Eds.). (1954). Psychotherapy and personality change: Coordinated research studies in the client-centered approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rogers, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person: a therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  31. Safdar, S., Friedlmeier, W., Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., Kwantes, C. T., Kakai, H., & Shigemasu, E. (2009). Variations of emotional display rules within and across cultures: A comparison between Canada, USA, and Japan. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  32. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally - lessons from the European social survey. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Causes of culture: National differences in cultural embeddedness. In A. Gari & K. Mylonas (Eds.), Quod Erat demonstrandum: From Herodotus’ ethnographic journeys to cross-cultural research (pp. 1–11). Athens: Pedio Books Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 199–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tamir, M., & Ford, B. Q. (2012). Should people pursue feelings that feel good or feelings that do good? Emotional preferences and well-being. Emotion, 12, 1061–1070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tamir, M., Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Riediger, M., Torres, C., Scollon, C., Dzokoto, V., Zhou, X., & Vishkin, A. (2016). Desired emotions across cultures: A value-based account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 67–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tamir, M., Schwartz, S. H., Oishi, S., & Kim, M. (2017). The secret to happiness: Feeling good or feeling right? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 46(10), 1448–1459.Google Scholar
  39. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 288–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M. J., Brown, R., et al. (2016). Beyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 966–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min Young Kim
    • 1
  • Mohsen Joshanloo
    • 1
  • Emese Foldesi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKeimyung UniversityDaeguSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations