Does Empathy Promotion Necessarily Lead to Greater Forgiveness? An Experimental Examination
- 184 Downloads
Empathy toward one’s offender has been identified as an important variable in the forgiveness process, but elements of the empathy—forgiveness connection have yet to be explored. The current study experimentally examined both direct and indirect methods of promoting general empathy (i.e., empathy not connected specifically to the offense) toward a confederate who behaved inconsiderately, and how those methods of general empathy promotion affected forgiveness. Results demonstrated that a direct method of promoting empathy (i.e., being instructed to empathize with the confederate) increased empathy toward the confederate, whereas an indirect method (i.e., the confederate’s display of emotional vulnerability) did not significantly increase empathy. The direct promotion of general empathy facilitated higher levels of self-reported forgiveness, whereas the indirect attempt to promote general empathy resulted in lower self-reported and behavioral forgiveness. The results help to refine our understanding of the empathy—forgiveness connection by questioning the types and forms of empathy that might be useful for promoting forgiveness.
KeywordsForgiveness Empathy Emotional vulnerability Helping relationships
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf.
- Brammer, L. M., & Shostrom, E. L. (1982). Therapeutic psychology: Fundamentals of counseling and psychotherapy (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Zell, A. L., Kraft, A. J., & Witvliet, C. V. O. (2008). Not so innocent: Does seeing one’s own capability for wrongdoing predict forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1685.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hall, A. M., Ferreira, P. H., Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., & Ferreira, M. L. (2010). The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review. Physical Therapy, 90, 1099–1110. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katz, I., & Glass, D. C. (1979). An ambivalence-amplification theory of behavior toward the stigmatized. In W. G., Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Lin, W.-F., Mack, D., Enright, R. D., Krahn, D., & Baskin, T. W. (2004). Effects of forgiveness therapy on anger, mood, and vulnerability to substance use among inpatient substance-dependent clients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1114–1121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1241.
- McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington Jr., E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships II: Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1996.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sandage, S. J., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2010). Comparison of two group interventions to promote forgiveness: Empathy as a mediator of change. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 32, 35–57.Google Scholar
- Sointu, E. T., Savolainen, H., Lappalainen, K., & Lambert, M. C. (2017). Longitudinal associations of student–teacher relationships and behavioural and emotional strengths on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 37, 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1165796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Staub, E. (1978). Positive social behavior and morality: Social and personal influences (vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Struthers, C. W., Eaton, J., Santelli, A. G., Uchiyama, M., & Shirvani, N. (2008). The effects of attributions of intent and apology on forgiveness: When saying sorry may not help the story. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2005). In search of a common core: A content analysis of interventions to promote forgiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 160–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3188.8.131.52.
- Wade, N. G., Worthington Jr., E. L., & Meyer, J. E. (2005b). But do they work? A meta-analysis of group interventions to promote forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Witvliet, C. V. O., Hofelich, A. J., Mohr, A. J. H., Hinman, N. G., & Knoll, R. W. (2015). Transforming or restraining rumination: The impact of compassionate reappraisal versus emotion suppression on empathy, forgiveness, and affective psychophysiology. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.941381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar