Advertisement

Does Empathy Promotion Necessarily Lead to Greater Forgiveness? An Experimental Examination

  • Marilyn A. Cornish
  • Max Guyll
  • Nathaniel G. Wade
  • Daniel G. Lannin
  • Stephanie Madon
  • K. Christine Chason
Article
  • 147 Downloads

Abstract

Empathy toward one’s offender has been identified as an important variable in the forgiveness process, but elements of the empathy—forgiveness connection have yet to be explored. The current study experimentally examined both direct and indirect methods of promoting general empathy (i.e., empathy not connected specifically to the offense) toward a confederate who behaved inconsiderately, and how those methods of general empathy promotion affected forgiveness. Results demonstrated that a direct method of promoting empathy (i.e., being instructed to empathize with the confederate) increased empathy toward the confederate, whereas an indirect method (i.e., the confederate’s display of emotional vulnerability) did not significantly increase empathy. The direct promotion of general empathy facilitated higher levels of self-reported forgiveness, whereas the indirect attempt to promote general empathy resulted in lower self-reported and behavioral forgiveness. The results help to refine our understanding of the empathy—forgiveness connection by questioning the types and forms of empathy that might be useful for promoting forgiveness.

Keywords

Forgiveness Empathy Emotional vulnerability Helping relationships 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf.
  2. Batson, C. D., O’Quin, K., Fultz, J., Vanderplas, M., & Isen, A. M. (1983). Influence of self-reported distress and empathy on egoistic versus altruistic motivation to help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 706–718.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batson, C. D., Bolen, M. H., Cross, J. A., & Neuringer-Benefiel, H. E. (1986). Where is the altruism in the altruistic personality? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 212–220.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Forgiveness and relationship satisfaction: Mediating mechanisms. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 551–559.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Brammer, L. M., & Shostrom, E. L. (1982). Therapeutic psychology: Fundamentals of counseling and psychotherapy (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, M. (2013). Toward a theoretical model to understand teacher emotions and teacher burnout in the context of student misbehavior: Appraisal, regulation and coping. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 799–817.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9335-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curtis, D. A., & Hart, C. L. (2015). Pinocchio’s nose in therapy: Therapists’ beliefs and attitudes toward client deception. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 37, 279–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-015-9243-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, J. R., & Gold, G. J. (2011). An examination of emotional empathy, attributions of stability, and the link between perceived remorse and forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 392–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DuBois, D. L., & Silverthorn, N. (2005). Characteristics of natural mentoring relationships and adolescent adjustment: Evidence from a national study. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 69–92.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1832-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Eaton, J., & Struthers, C. W. (2006). The reduction of psychological aggression across varied time interpersonal contexts through repentance and forgiveness. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Exline, J. J., & Zell, A. L. (2009). Empathy, self-affirmation, and forgiveness: The moderating roles of gender an entitlement. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 1071–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2009.28.9.1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Zell, A. L., Kraft, A. J., & Witvliet, C. V. O. (2008). Not so innocent: Does seeing one’s own capability for wrongdoing predict forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 495–515.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.495.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Feiler, D. C., Tost, L. P., & Grant, A. M. (2012). Mixed reasons, missed givings: The costs of blending egoistic and altruistic donation requests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1322–1328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fincham, F. D., Paleari, F. G., & Regalia, C. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: The role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy. Personal Relationships, 9, 27–37.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graton, A., Ric, F., & Gonzalez, E. (2016). Reparation or reactance? The influence of guilt on reaction to persuasive communication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 40–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, A. M., Ferreira, P. H., Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., & Ferreira, M. L. (2010). The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review. Physical Therapy, 90, 1099–1110.  https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hendriks, M. C. P., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2006). Social messages of crying faces: Their influence on anticipated person perception, emotions and behavioral responses. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 878–886.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500450218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Houston, D. A. (1990). Empathy and the self: Cognitive and emotional influences on the evaluation of negative affect in others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 859–868.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katz, I., & Glass, D. C. (1979). An ambivalence-amplification theory of behavior toward the stigmatized. In W. G., Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  24. Lannin, D. G., Guyll, M., Krizan, Z., Madon, S., & Cornish, M. A. (2014). When are grandiose and vulnerable narcissists least helpful? Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 127–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin, W.-F., Mack, D., Enright, R. D., Krahn, D., & Baskin, T. W. (2004). Effects of forgiveness therapy on anger, mood, and vulnerability to substance use among inpatient substance-dependent clients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1114–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McCullough, M. E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 194–197.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.321.
  28. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington Jr., E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships II: Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J. A. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 540–557.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulleting, 31, 368–378.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reed, G. L., & Enright, R. D. (2006). The effects of forgiveness on depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress for women after spousal emotional abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 920–929.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.920.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Romero, C. (2008). Writing wrongs: Promoting forgiveness through expressive writing. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 625–642.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508093788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sandage, S. J., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2010). Comparison of two group interventions to promote forgiveness: Empathy as a mediator of change. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 32, 35–57.Google Scholar
  35. Santelli, A. G., Struthers, C. W., & Eaton, J. (2009). Fit to forgive: Exploring the interaction between regulatory focus, repentance, and forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 381–394.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012882.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sassenrath, C., Pfattheicher, S., & Keller, J. (2017). I might ease your pain, but only if you’re sad: The impact of the empathized emotion on the empathy-helping association. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 96–106.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9586-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlenker, B. R., Pontari, B. A., & Christopher, A. N. (2001). Excuses and character: Personal and social implications of excuses. Personality & Social Psychology Review (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 5(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schloper, J., & Thompson, V. (1968). Role of attribution processes in mediating amount of reciprocity for a favor. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 10, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sointu, E. T., Savolainen, H., Lappalainen, K., & Lambert, M. C. (2017). Longitudinal associations of student–teacher relationships and behavioural and emotional strengths on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 37, 457–467.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1165796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Staub, E. (1978). Positive social behavior and morality: Social and personal influences (vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Struthers, C. W., Eaton, J., Santelli, A. G., Uchiyama, M., & Shirvani, N. (2008). The effects of attributions of intent and apology on forgiveness: When saying sorry may not help the story. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 983–992.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wade, N. G., & Meyer, J. E. (2009). Comparison of brief group interventions to promote forgiveness: A pilot outcome study. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 59, 199–220.  https://doi.org/10.1521/ijgp.2009.59.2.199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2005). In search of a common core: A content analysis of interventions to promote forgiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 160–177. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.42.2.160.
  44. Wade, N. G., Bailey, D., & Shaffer, P. (2005a). Helping clients heal: Does forgiveness make a difference? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 634–641.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.36.6.634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wade, N. G., Worthington Jr., E. L., & Meyer, J. E. (2005b). But do they work? A meta-analysis of group interventions to promote forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Witvliet, C. V. O., Hofelich, A. J., Mohr, A. J. H., Hinman, N. G., & Knoll, R. W. (2015). Transforming or restraining rumination: The impact of compassionate reappraisal versus emotion suppression on empathy, forgiveness, and affective psychophysiology. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 248–261.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.941381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marilyn A. Cornish
    • 1
  • Max Guyll
    • 2
  • Nathaniel G. Wade
    • 2
  • Daniel G. Lannin
    • 3
  • Stephanie Madon
    • 2
  • K. Christine Chason
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation, and CounselingAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations