Advertisement

Relationship between symptoms of menopause and personality traits in Polish perimenopausal women: A correlation study

  • Małgorzata Włodarczyk
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to elucidate the relationship between menopausal symptoms and personality traits. 212 Polish women were administered the Big Five Factor personal inventory. Participants also completed the Polish version of the Menopause Symptom List. I found that personality traits correlated with symptoms of menopause. Neuroticism showed the strongest correlation with the frequency of psychological symptoms of menopause (r = .46, p = .000) and their intensity (r = .45, p = .000). The remaining personality traits demonstrated a negative correlation with menopausal symptoms. No correlation was found between openness to experience and the frequency of vasomotor (r = −.07, p = .268) and somatic (r = −.12, p = .059) symptoms, as well as intensity of vasomotor symptoms of menopause (r = −.10, p = .144). Openness to experience did not differentiate the sample in the frequency of experienced vasomotor symptoms of menopause (p = 0.205). Neuroticism was a significant predictor of the frequency of psychological (β = .486, p = .000), vasomotor (β = .342, p = .000) and somatic (β = .366, p = .000) symptoms, as well as intensity of psychological (β = .470, p = .000), vasomotor (β = .250, p = .008) and somatic (β = .287, p = .001) symptoms of menopause. This study provides further data on the association between menopausal symptoms and personality traits. Neuroticism is shown to be a significant predictor of the frequency and intensity of psychological, vasomotor and somatic symptoms of menopause.

Keywords

Personality traits Menopausal symptoms Menopause Perimenopause 

Notes

Funding

This study was part of a research project on the sense of quality of health in perimenopausal women. The project was funded by grant no. 0420/2400/17. The author was under no pressure from any stakeholders in the course of the study or while processing the results.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1969 Helsinski declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

References

  1. Avis, N. E., Brockwell, S., & Colvin, A. A. (2005). Universal menopausal syndrome? The American Journal of Medicine, 19(Suppl 12B), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayers, B., Forshaw, M., & Hunter, M. S. (2010). The impact of attitudes towards the menopause on women’s symptom experiences: A systematic review. Maturitas, 65, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauld, R., & Brown, R. F. (2009). Stress, psychological distress, psychosocial factors, menopause symptoms and physical health in women. Maturitas, 62, 160–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bielawska-Batorowicz, E. (2003). Polish adaptation of the menopause symptom list by Janette M. Perz. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Psychologica, 8, 45–54.Google Scholar
  5. Binfa, L., Castelo-Branco, C., Blumel, J., et al. (2004). Influence of psycho-social factors on climacteric symptoms. Maturitas, 48, 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake, J. (2006). Menopause: Evidence-based practice. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 20(6), 799–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloch, A. (2002). Self-awareness during the menopause. Maturitas, 41, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blümel, J. E. M., Castelo-Branco, C., Cancelo, M. J., et al. (2004). Relationship between psychological complaints and vasomotor symptoms during climacteric. Maturitas, 49, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bosworth, H. B., Bastian, L. A., Rimer, B. K., & Siegler, I. C. (2003). Coping styles and personality domains related to menopausal stress. Womens Health Issues, 13(1), 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boughton, M. A. (2002). Premature menopause: Multiple disruptions between the woman’s biological body experience and her lived body. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(5), 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruce, D., & Rymer, J. (2009). Symptoms of the menopause. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 23(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elavsky, S., & McAuley, E. (2009). Personality, menopausal symptoms, and physical activity outcomes in middle-aged women. Pers Individ Dif., 46(2), 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elavsky, S., Molenaar, P. C., Gold, C. H., Williams, N. I., & Aronson, K. R. (2012). Daily physical activity and menopausal hot flashes: Applying a novel within-person approach to demonstrate individual differences. Maturitas, 71, 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eriksen, H. R., & Ursin, H. (2004). Subjective health complaints, sensitization, and sustained cognitive activation (stress). Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56(4), 445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, E. W., Sammel, M. D., Liu, L., Gracia, C. R., Nelson, D. B., & Hollander, L. (2004). Hormones and menopausal status as predictors of depression in women in transition to menopause. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greene, J. G. (1998). Constructing a standard climacteric scale. Maturitas, 29, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harlow, S. D., Gass, M., Hall, J. E., Lobo, R., Maki, P., Rebar, R. W., et al. (2012). Executive summary of the stages of reproductive aging workshop +10: Addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. Menopause, 19(4), 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunter, M. S., & Chilcot, J. (2013). Testing a cognitive model of menopausal hot flushes and night sweats. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 74, 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunter, M., & Rendall, M. (2007). Bio-psycho-socio-cultural perspectives on menopause. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 21(2), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jurczak, A., Szkup, M., Wieder-Huszla, S., Grzywacz, A., Samochowiec, A., Karakiewicz, B., Samochowiec, J., & Grochans, E. (2015). The assessment of the relationship between personality, the presence of the 5HTT and MAO-A polymorphisms, and the severity of climacteric and depressive symptoms in postmenopausal women. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 18, 613–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keefer, L., & Blanchard, E. B. (2005). Hot flash, hot topic: Conceptualizing menopausal symptoms from a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(1), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mauas, V., Kopala-Sibley, D. C., & Zurof, D. C. (2014). Depressive symptoms in the transition to menopause: The roles of irritability, personality vulnerability, and self-regulation. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 17(4), 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across. Instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McKinley, N. M., & Lyon, L. A. (2008). Menopausal attitudes, objectified body consciousness, aging anxiety, and body esteem: European American women’s body experiences in midlife. Body Image, 5, 375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mishra, G., & Kuh, D. (2006). Perceived change in quality of life during the menopause. Social Science & Medicine, 62(1), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. North American Menopause Society (NAMS). (2004). Treatment of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: Positions statement. Menopause, 2, 11–33.Google Scholar
  27. Nosek, M., Kennedy, H. P., Beyene, Y., Taylor, D., Gilliss, C., & Lee, K. (2010). The effects of perceived stress and attitudes toward menopause and aging on symptoms of menopause. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 55(4), 328–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perz, J. M. (1997). Development of the menopause symptom list: A factor analytic study of menopause associated symptoms. Women & Health, 25, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pramataroff, V., Leppert, K., & Strauss, B. (2007). Denial of the climacteric: A pilot study of a common clinical phenomenon. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28(3), 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rahman, S. A. S. A., Zainudin, S. R., & Mun, V. L. K. (2010). Assessment of menopausal symptoms using modified menopause rating scale (MRS) among middle age women in Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Family Medicine, 9(5), 2–6.Google Scholar
  31. Research on the Menopause in the 1990s (1996). Report of a WHO Scientifict group. Geneva.Google Scholar
  32. Siuta, J. (2006). Inwentarz Osobowości – NEO-PI-R. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar
  33. Slade, P., & Amaee, S. (1995). The role of anxiety and temperature in the experience of menopausal hot flushes. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 13, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soules, M. R., Sherman, S., Parrott, E., Rebar, R., Santoro, N., Utian, W., & Woods, N. (2001). Executive summary: stages of reproductive aging workshop (STRAW). Fertility and Sterility, 76(5), 874-878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Utian, W. H. (2005). Psychosocial and socioeconomic burden of vasomotor symptoms in menopause: A comprehensive review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3(47), 1–10.Google Scholar
  36. Utian, W. H. (2007). Quality of life (QOL) in menopause. Maturitas, 57, 100–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Veeninga, A. T., & Kraaimaat, F. W. (1995). A multifactorial approach to complaints during the climacteric. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 13, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Venzon, C. T., Kern de Castro, E., & Antonello, I. C. F. (2016). Personality traits and clinical/biochemical course in the first year after kidney transplant. Renal Failure, 38(9), 1383–1390.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2016.1216712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of WrocławWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations