Advertisement

Bad Behaviors at Work: Spanish Adaptation of the Workplace Deviance Scale

  • Elena Fernández del Río
  • Juan Ramón Barrada
  • Pedro J. Ramos-Villagrasa
Article

Abstract

Counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs) refers to a set of negative intentional behaviors that harm organizational outcomes. Despite their consequences, their measurement is a debatable issue. The present study is aimed to validate the Spanish version of one of the most commonly used scales of CWBs, the Workplace Deviance Scale, and to provide further evidence about the reliability and validity of the test scores. Four hundred and thirty-two employees from different organizations participated in the study. They completed a self-report questionnaire with the measures of interest (sociodemographic data, the Workplace Deviance Scale, and scales of organizational citizenship behavior, organizational justice, integrity, and conscientiousness). Descriptive, exploratory structural equation modeling and correlational analyses were performed. Results have shown that the internal structure does not fully reproduce the original one, but the two theoretically expected factors remain. Furthermore, the pattern of associations is barely influenced by the scoring scheme used (factor vs. observed scores), and the associations with other constructs are in line with previous research. On the whole, this study contributes to the analysis of the dimensionality of CWBs, at least in Western countries.

Keywords

Counterproductive work behaviors Organizational deviance Interpersonal deviance Job performance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Spanish National Plan for R&D, Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PSI2013-44854-R project) for support that, in part, assisted the composition of this article.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., Mama, C., & Morin, M. M. (2009). Counterproductive behaviors and psychological well-being: The moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 351–361.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9113-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazzy, J. D., & Woehr, D. J. (2017). Integrity, ego depletion, and the interactive impact on counterproductive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 105(15), 124–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, T. E. (2005). Development and validation of a situational judgment test of employee integrity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3), 225–232.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00319.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, R. J., & Marasi, S. (2016). Workplace deviance. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health (2nd ed., pp. 382–386). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C., & Barratt, C. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 613–636.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 410–424.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowling, N. A., & Gruys, M. L. (2010). Overlooked issues in the conceptualization and measurement of counterproductive work behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruursema, K., Kessler, S. R., & Spector, P. E. (2011). Bored employees misbehaving: The relationship between boredom and counterproductive work behaviour. Work & Stress, 25(2), 93–107.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.596670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke, M. J., Sarpy, S. A., Tesluk, P. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2002). General safety performance: A test of a grounded theoretical model. Personnel Psychology, 55(2), 429–457.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00116.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Catano, V. M., Brochu, A., & Lamerson, C. D. (2012). Assessing the reliability of situational judgment tests used in high-stakes situations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(3), 333–346.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00604.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coffin, B. (2003). Breaking the silence on white collar crime. Risk Management, 50, 8 Retrieved from http://cf.rims.org/Magazine/PrintTemplate.cfm?AID=2090.Google Scholar
  17. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). Inventario de personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R). Inventario NEO reducido de Cinco factores (NEO- FFI). Manual 3ª edición [NEO PI-R revised neo personality inventory and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO- FFI)]. Madrid: TEA.Google Scholar
  18. Coyne, I., Gentile, D., Born, M. P., Ersoy, N. C., & Vakola, M. (2013). The relationship between productive and counterproductive work behaviour across four European countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 377–389.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.673280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dávila, M. C., & Finkelstein, M. A. (2010). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior from the functional analysis and role identity perspectives: Further evidence in Spanish employees. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 277–283.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600003851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Díaz-Vilela, L., Díaz-Cabrera, D., Isla-Díaz, R., Hernández-Fernaud, E., & Rosales-Sánchez, C. (2012). Spanish adaptation of the citizenship performance questionnaire by Coleman and Borman (2000) and an analysis of the empiric structure of the construct. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 28(3), 135–149.  https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2012a11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Davis, R. D., & Rostow, C. D. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 616–627.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fine, S., & Edward, M. (2017). Breaking the rules, not the law: The potential risks of counterproductive work behaviors among overqualified employees. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(4), 401–405.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fine, S., Horowitz, I., Weigler, H., & Basis, L. (2010). Is good character good enough? The effects of situational variables on the relationship between integrity and counterproductive work behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 73–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(4), 625–641.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garrido, L. E., Barrada, J. R., Aguasvivas, J. A., Martínez-Molina, A., Arias, V. B., Golino, H. F., ... & Rojo-Moreno, L. (2018). Is small still beautiful for the strengths and difficulties questionnaire? Novel findings using exploratory structural equation modeling. Assessment. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118780461.
  27. Gilboa, S., Shirom, A., Fried, Y., & Cooper, C. (2008). A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: Examining main and moderating effects. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 227–271.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. González-Navarro, P., Zurriaga-Llorens, R., Tosin, A., & Llinares-Insa, L. I. (2018). Envy and counterproductive work behavior: The moderation role of leadership in public and private organizations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1455.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Griffin, R. W., & Lopez, Y. P. (2005). Bad behavior in organizations: A review and typology for future research. Journal of Management, 31(6), 988–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P., & Spielberger, C. (Eds.). (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Harris, L. C., & Ogbonna, E. (2006). Service sabotage: A study of antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 543–559.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070306287324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 305–325.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupré, K. E., Inness, M., LeBlanc, M. M., & Sivanathan, N. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 228–238.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hirschfeld, G., von Brachel, R., & Thielsch, M. (2014). Selecting items for big five questionnaires: At what sample size do factor loadings stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 53(1), 54–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hollinger, R. C. (1986). Acts against the workplace: Social bonding and employee deviance. Deviant Behavior, 7(1), 53–76.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1986.9967695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaplan, S., Bradley, J. C., Luchman, J. N., & Haynes, D. (2010). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 162–176.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kelloway, E. K., Francis, L., Prosser, M., & Cameron, J. E. (2010). Counterproductive work behavior as protest. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lievens, F., Corstjens, J., Sorrel, M. A., Abad, F. J., Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V. (2015). The cross-cultural transportability of situational judgment tests: How does a US-based integrity situational judgment test fare in Spain? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 23(4), 361–372.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Malachowski, D. (2005). Wasted time at work costing companies billions. Retrieved from https://apexassisting.com/wasted-time-at-work-costing-companies-billions/ Google Scholar
  43. Martin, L. E., Brock, M. E., Buckley, M. R., & Ketchen, D. J. (2010). Time banditry: Examining the purloining of time in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 26–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meier, L. L., & Spector, P. E. (2013). Reciprocal effects of work stressors and counterproductive work behavior: A five-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 529–539.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mercado, B. K., & Dilchert, S. (2017). Family interference with work and its relationship with organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(4), 406–415.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2017). Are the emotionally intelligent good citizens or counterproductive? A meta-analysis of emotional intelligence and its relationships with organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 116(1), 144–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moliner, C., Martinez-Tur, V., Ramos, J., Peiró, J. M., & Cropanzano, R. (2008). Organizational justice and extrarole customer service: The mediating role of well-being at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(3), 327–348.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701743616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Munene, J. C. (1995). “Not-on-seat”: An investigation of some correlates of organisational citizenship behaviour in Nigeria. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44(2), 111–122.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01069.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murphy, K. R. (1994). Honesty in the workplace. Pacific Groves: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  50. Ng, T. W. H., Lam, S. S. K., & Feldman, D. C. (2016). Organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior: Do males and females differ? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 93(1), 11–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Eby, L. T. (2006). Locus of control at work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1057–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Organ, D. W., & Paine, J. B. (1999). A new kind of performance for industrial and organizational psychology: Recent contributions to the study of organizational citizenship behavior. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 337–368). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Peterson, M. H., Griffith, R. L., & Converse, P. D. (2009). Examining the role of applicant faking in hiring decisions: Percentage of fakers hired and hiring discrepancies in single- and multiple-predictor selection. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(4), 373–386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9121-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robinson, S. L. (2008). Dysfunctional workplace behavior. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 141–159). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  57. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rogers, K., & Kelloway, E. K. (1997). Violence at work: Personal and organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2(1), 63–71.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.2.1.63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66–80.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviours at work. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145–164). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sackett, P. R., Berry, C. M., Wiemann, S. A., & Laczo, R. M. (2006). Citizenship and counterproductive behavior: Clarifying relations between the two domains. Human Performance, 19(4), 441–464.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1904_7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Salgado, J. F. (2002). The big five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1–2), 117–125.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2000). Autoeficacia y criterios organizacionales de desempeño [Self-efficacy and organizational performance criteria]. Apuntes de Psicología, 18(1), 179–191.Google Scholar
  64. Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Anderson, N. (2013). Personality and counterproductive work behavior. In N. Christiansen & R. Tett (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 606–632). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stanek, K. C., Ones, D. S., & McGue, M. (2017). Counterproductive behaviors: Relations across life domains, etiology, and implications for applied practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 111–124.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture‘s consequences: A three decade, multi-level, meta-analytic review of Hofstede‘s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405–439.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whelpley, C. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (2016). Self-esteem and counterproductive work behaviors: A systematic review. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(4), 850–863.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2014-0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang, Y., & Liao, Z. (2015). Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 959–987.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9425-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang, R., Redfern, K., Newman, M. A., & Ferreira-Meyers, K. (2016). If you are emotionally intelligent: The effects of customer-related social stressors on counterproductive work behavior for front-line service employees. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 24(3), 260–271.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and SociologyUniversidad de ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations