Teachers’ personality traits and students’ motivation: A structural equation modeling analysis
One of the most prominent factors in developing more effective teaching and learning strategies is the association between personality traits and motivation. The current research examined the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and students’ motivation. Thirteen English teachers and 375 high school students participated in this study. The teachers completed the Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and the students filled out Language Learning Orientations Scale – Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation Subscales (LLOS – IEA). The results showed some significant relationships between the Big Five traits and the subscales of motivation. Particularly, teachers’ conscientiousness personality trait had a positive effect on students’ intrinsic- motivation- knowledge. In addition, teachers’ extraversion personality trait had a negative effect on students’ intrinsic- motivation- accomplishment, and knowledge. The results of this study can help the teachers to know how to behave in the classroom. More specifically, the study shows exactly which personality traits will result in increasing or decreasing students’ motivation.
KeywordsMotivation Intrinsic motivation Extrinsic motivation Amotivation Personality Neuroticism Extraversion Agreeableness Openness to experience Conscientiousness
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Anderson, G. R. (2009). Achieving teaching excellence: A step-by-step guide: Gerald Anderson.Google Scholar
- Anisi, J., Majdiyan, M., Joshanloo, M., & Ghoharikamel, Z. (2011). Validity and reliability of NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) on university students. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 351–355.Google Scholar
- Bouras, M. H., & Keskes, P. S. (2014). Teacher-learner rapport impact on EFL learners’ motivation.Google Scholar
- Claessens, L. C. A., van Tartwijk, J., van der Want, A. C., Pennings, H. J. M., Verloop, N., den Brok, P. J., & Wubbels, T. (2016). Positive teacher–student relationships go beyond the classroom, problematic ones stay inside. The Journal of Educational Research, 5, 478–493.Google Scholar
- Costa, P., & McCare, R. (1992). Professional manual for the NEO PI-R and NEO-FFI. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivation strategies in the language classroom. Ernst Klett Sprachen.Google Scholar
- Eryilmaz, A. (2014). Perceived personality traits and types of teachers and their relationship to the subjective well-being and academic achievements of adolescents. Educational Sciences: Theory and practice, 14(6), 2049–2062.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, L. R. (1971). A historical survey of personality scales and inventories. Oregon Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-teacher relationships as a source of support and risk in schools. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 59–71). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- Hassanzadeh, R., & Mahdinejad Gorji, G. (2014). The relationships between motivational orientations (intrinsic motivation,extrinsic motivation & amotivation) and students' academic achievement in the english language. School Psychology, 3(3), 38–60.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and research, 2(1999), 102–138.Google Scholar
- Khalilzadeh, S. (2016). A study on the relationship between teachers’ big five personality traits and Iranian high school students’ motivation (Master’s Thesis). Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan. Rafsanjan, Iran.Google Scholar
- Mehrani, M. B., & Khodi, A. (2014). An appraisal of the Iranian academic research on English language teaching. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(3), 89–97.Google Scholar
- Montalvo, G. (1998). Pleasing the teacher. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 58(8-A).Google Scholar
- Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the class-room: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133–144.Google Scholar
- Thibodeau, G. P., & Hillman, S. J. (2003). In retrospect: Teachers who made a difference from the perspective of pre-service and experienced teachers. Education, 124(1), 168–181.Google Scholar
- Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the academic motivation scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., Mainhard, T., den Brok, P., & van Tartwijk, J. (2016). Teacher-student relationships and student achievement. Handbook of Social Influences in School Contexts: Social-Emotional, Motivation, and Cognitive Outcomes, 127–145.Google Scholar