Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 1162–1173 | Cite as

The relationship between the big five and cyberbullying among college students: the mediating effect of moral disengagement

  • Yuhong Zhou
  • Weixi Zheng
  • Xuemei GaoEmail author
Article

Abstract

The present study examined the prevalence of cyberbullying and the mediating effect of moral disengagement in the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and cyberbullying. We recruited 655 undergraduates to complete the NEO Five-Factor Inventory, Moral Disengagement Scale, and Cyberbullying Questionnaire. The results revealed: (1) significant gender differences in cyberbullying, with males reporting more cyberbullying than females in all three dimensions: perpetration, victimization, and bystander behavior; (2) agreeableness was negatively related to engaging in perpetration, victimization, and bystander behavior, whereas neuroticism was only positively related to bystander behavior; and (3) moral disengagement played a partially mediating role in the relationship between neuroticism and bystander behavior, as well as the relationship between agreeableness and bystander behavior. Moreover, moral disengagement played a totally mediating role in the relationship between agreeableness and engagement in perpetration, as well as the relationship between agreeableness and involvement in victimization.

Keywords

College students Big five personality Cyberbullying Moral disengagement 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the National social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 14XSH013), The 13th Five-Year Plan for Education Science of Chongqing (Grant No. 2016-GX-086).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

This research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Author Z declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Z declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author G declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Akbulut, Y., & Eristi, B. (2011). Cyberbullying and victimisation among turkish university students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1155–1170.Google Scholar
  2. Akbulut, Y., Sahin, Y. L., & Eristi, B. (2010). Cyberbullying victimization among turkish online social utility members. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 192–201.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C., & Bushman, B. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27–51.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231.
  4. Aricak, O. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 8(34), 167–184.Google Scholar
  5. Balakrishnan, V. (2018). Actions, emotional reactions and cyberbullying – From the lens of bullies, victims, bully-victims and bystanders among Malaysian young adults. Telematics & Informatics.Google Scholar
  6. Baldasare, A., Bauman, S., Goldman, L., & Robie, A. (2012). Cyberbullying? voices of college students. (pp. 127–155) Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2012)0000005010.
  7. Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, states of mind (pp. 161–191). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 45–103). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364.Google Scholar
  10. Barlett, C., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: The moderating role of age. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 474–488.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baroncelli, A., & Ciucci, E. (2014). Unique effects of different components of trait emotional intelligence in traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescence, 37(6), 807–815.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.05.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2010). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  13. Beckman, L., Hagquist, C., & Hellstrom, L. (2013). Discrepant gender patterns for cyberbullying and traditional bullying - an analysis of Swedish adolescent data. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1896–1903.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.010.Google Scholar
  14. Bond, M. H. (1983). Linking person perception dimensions to behavioral intention dimensionsthe chinese connection. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14(1), 41–63.Google Scholar
  15. Bond, M. H., & Others, A. (1975). Universality and distinctiveness in dimensions of japanese person perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6(3), 346–357.Google Scholar
  16. Brack, K., & Caltabiano, N. (2014). Cyberbullying and self-esteem in Australian adults. Cyberpsychology, 8(2), 1.Google Scholar
  17. Bussey, K., Fitzpatrick, S., & Raman, A. (2015a). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 30.Google Scholar
  18. Bussey, K., Quinn, C., & Dobson, J. (2015b). The moderating role of empathic concern and perspective taking on the relationship between moral disengagement and aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (Wayne State University Press), 61(1), 10–29.Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, M. A., Whiteford, C., Duncanson, K., Spears, B., Butler, D., & Slee, P. T. (2017). Cyberbullying bystanders: Gender, grade, and actions among primary and secondary school students in Australia. International Journal of Technoethics, 8(1), 44–55.Google Scholar
  20. Cappadocia, M. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. (2013). Cyberbullying: Prevalence, stability, and risk factors during adolescence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28(2), 171–192.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573513491212.Google Scholar
  21. Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Tisak, M. S., Paciello, M., Caprara, M. G., Gerbino, M., & Fontaine, R. G. (2013). Individual differences in personality conducive to engagement in aggression and violence. European Journal of Personality, 27(3), 290–303.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1855.
  22. Caprara, G. V., Gerbino, M., Perinelli, E., Alessandri, G., Lenti, C., Walder, M., ... Nobile, M. (2017). Individual differences in personality associated with aggressive behavior among adolescents referred for externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(4), 680–692. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9608-8.
  23. Celik, S., Atak, H., & Erguzen, A. (2012). The effect of personality on cyberbullying among university students in Turkey. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 12(49), 129–150.Google Scholar
  24. Ciucci, E., & Baroncelli, A. (2014). Emotion-related personality traits and peer social standing: Unique and interactive effects in cyberbullying behaviors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(9), 584–590.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0020.Google Scholar
  25. Costa PT, McCrae RR. (1992). NEO-PI-R professional manual. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Google Scholar
  26. Cui, H., & Wang, D. F. (2005). Relations between western agreeableness and chinese personality. Journal of Southwest China Normal University.Google Scholar
  27. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ebeling-Witte, S., Frank, M., & Lester, D. (2007). Shyness, internet use, and personality. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 713–716.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9964.Google Scholar
  29. Egan, V., Hughes, N., & Palmer, E. J. (2015). Moral disengagement, the dark triad, and unethical consumer attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 123–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.054.
  30. Erreygers, S., Pabian, S., Vandebosch, H., & Baillien, E. (2016). Helping behavior among adolescent bystanders of cyberbullying: The role of impulsivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.03.003.Google Scholar
  31. Eslea, M., & Mukhtar, K. (2000). Bullying and racism among asian schoolchildren in britain. Educational Research, 42(2), 207–217.Google Scholar
  32. Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2013). Social relations and cyberbullying: The influence of individual and structural attributes on victimization and perpetration via the internet. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 101–126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01442.x.Google Scholar
  33. Fields, S. K., Mahan, P., Tillman, P., Harris, J., Maxwell, K., & Hojat, M. (2011). Measuring empathy in healthcare profession students using the jefferson scale of physician empathy: Health provider - student version. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25(4), 287–293.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.566648.
  34. Gámez-Guadix, M., Villa-George, F., & Calvete, E. (2014). Psychometric properties of the cyberbullying questionnaire (cbq) among mexican adolescents. Violence & Victims, 29(2), 232.Google Scholar
  35. Gibb, Z., & Devereux, P. (2014). Who does that anyway? Predictors and personality correlates of cyberbullying in college. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 8–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.009.Google Scholar
  36. Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Bussey, K. (2015). Moral disengagement moderates the link between psychopathic traits and aggressive behavior among early adolescents. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 61, 51–67.Google Scholar
  37. Goodboy, A., & Martin, M. (2015). The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the dark triad. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052.Google Scholar
  38. Heiman, T., Olenikshemesh, D., & Eden, S. (2015). Cyberbullying involvement among students with adhd: Relation to loneliness, self-efficacy and social support. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
  39. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (Corwin Press). Google Scholar
  40. Hojat, M. (1982). Loneliness as a function of selected personality variables. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 137–141. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<137::AID-JCLP2270380122>3.0.CO;2–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Huang, Y., & Chou, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1581–1590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005.Google Scholar
  42. Jenaro, C., Flores, N., & Frias, C. (2018). Systematic review of empirical studies on cyberbullying in adults: What we know and what we should investigate. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 38, 113–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.12.003.Google Scholar
  43. Karl, K., Peluchette, J., & Schlaegel, C. (2010). Who's posting facebook faux pas?: A cross-cultural examination of personality differences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(2), 174;186–174;186.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00499.x.Google Scholar
  44. Kayiş, A. R., Satici, S. A., Yilmaz, M. F., Şimşek, D., Ceyhan, E., & Bakioğlu, F. (2016). Big five-personality trait and internet addiction: A meta-analytic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 35–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.012.Google Scholar
  45. Kim, Y., & Jeong, J. S. (2015). Personality predictors for the use of multiple internet functions. Internet Research, 25(3), 399–415.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2013-0250.Google Scholar
  46. Kokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., Dalara, E., Koufogazou, A., & Papatziki, A. (2013). Cyber-bullying, personality and coping among pre-adolescents. International Journal of Cyber Behavior Psychology & Learning, 3(4), 55–69.  https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2013100104.Google Scholar
  47. Kokkinos, C., Baltzidis, E., & Xynogala, D. (2016a). Prevalence and personality correlates of facebook bullying among university undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 840–850.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.017.Google Scholar
  48. Kokkinos, C. M., Voulgaridou, I., & Markos, A. (2016b). Personality and relational aggression: Moral disengagement and friendship quality as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 74–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.028.Google Scholar
  49. Kowalski, R. M., Ph.D, & Limber, S. P., Ph.D. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13-S20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018.
  50. Kowalski, R., Giumetti, G., Schroeder, A., & Lattanner, M. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kumpulainen, K., Räsänen, E., & Henttonen, I. (1999). Children involved in bullying: Psychological disturbance and the persistence of the involvement. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(12), 1253–1262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00098-8.Google Scholar
  52. Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., Ourda, D., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2013). A process model of cyberbullying in adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 881–887.Google Scholar
  53. Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools - a research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157–170.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034306064547.Google Scholar
  54. Li, Q. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of adolescents' experience related to cyberbullying. Educational Research, 50(3), 223–234.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802309333.Google Scholar
  55. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  56. McCullough, M., Bellah, C., Kilpatrick, S., & Johnson, J. (2001). Vengefulness: Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-being and the big five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 601–610.Google Scholar
  57. Meter, D. J., & Bauman, S. (2016). Moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring: Effects on traditional bullying and victimization via cyberbullying involvement. The Journal of Early Adolescence.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616670752.
  58. Mitchell, S. M., Seegan, P. L., Roush, J. F., Brown, S. L., Sustaíta, M. A., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2016). Retrospective cyberbullying and suicide ideation: The mediating roles of depressive symptoms, perceived burdensomeness, and thwarted belongingness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516628291.
  59. Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.007.Google Scholar
  60. Mustafa, M. N. (2014). The effects of gender differences in ict application: Bridging the gap of knowledge and skills among teachers. Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences. Google Scholar
  61. Navarro, R., Ruiz-Oliva, R., Larrañaga, E., & Yubero, S. (2015). The impact of cyberbullying and social bullying on optimism, global and school-related happiness and life satisfaction among 10-12-year-old schoolchildren. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10(1), 15–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9292-0.Google Scholar
  62. Nixon, C. L. (2014). Current perspectives: The impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5, 143–158.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 66(6), 574–583.Google Scholar
  64. Orue, I., & Calvete, E. (2016). Psychopathic traits and moral disengagement interact to predict bullying and cyberbullying among adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516660302.
  65. Ozden, M. S., & Icellioglu, S. (2014). The perception of cyberbullying and cybervictimization by university students in terms of their personality factors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4379–4383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.951.Google Scholar
  66. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169.Google Scholar
  67. Pelfrey, W., & Weber, N. (2013). Keyboard gangsters: Analysis of incidence and correlates of cyberbullying in a large urban student population. Deviant Behavior, 34(1), 68–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2012.707541.Google Scholar
  68. Perren S, Sticca F. (2011). Bullying and morality: are there differences between traditional bullies and cyberbullies? Society for Research in child development biennial meeting, Montreal, QC.Google Scholar
  69. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–880.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Pornari, C., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81–94.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Renati, R., Berrone, C., & Zanetti, M. A. (2012). Morally disengaged and unempathic: Do cyberbullies fit these definitions? An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(8), 391–398.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0046.Google Scholar
  72. Robson, C., & Witenberg, R. T. (2013). The influence of moral disengagement, morally based self-esteem, age, and gender on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 211.Google Scholar
  73. Sagone, E., & Caroli, M. E. D. (2013). Personality factors and civic moral disengagement in law and psychology university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 158–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.170.
  74. Savage, M. W., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2017). Moving toward a theory: Testing an integrated model of cyberbullying perpetration, aggression, social skills, and internet self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 353–361.Google Scholar
  75. Schenk, A. M., & Fremouw, W. J. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. Journal of School Violence, 11(1), 21–37.Google Scholar
  76. Selkie, E. M., Kota, R., Chan, Y. F., & Moreno, M. (2015). Cyberbullying, depression, and problem alcohol use in female college students: A multisite study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(2), 79–86.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Semerci, A. (2017). Investigating the effects of personality traits on cyberbullying. Pegem Egitim Ve Ogretim Dergisi = Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 7(2), 211.  https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.008.Google Scholar
  78. Shaw, L. H., & Gant, L. M. (2002). In defense of the internet: The relationship between internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 157–171.  https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102753770552.Google Scholar
  79. Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students' facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(2), 67–75.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.20.2.67.Google Scholar
  80. Shin, N., & Ahn, H. (2015). Factors affecting adolescents' involvement in cyberbullying: What divides the 20% from the 80%? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 393–399.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0362.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, R. D. (2016). The relationship between HEXACO personality traits and cyberbullying perpetrators and victims.Google Scholar
  82. Song, J., & Oh, I. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders’ behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78.Google Scholar
  83. Sticca, F., Ruggieri, S., Alsaker, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 52–67.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2136.Google Scholar
  84. Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., & Pabian, S. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine "helping," "joining in," and "doing nothing" when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 383–396.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21534.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Van Geel, M., Goemans, A., Toprak, F., & Vedder, P. (2017). Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the big five, dark triad and sadism. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 231–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.063.Google Scholar
  86. Wachs, S. (2012). Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: Differences by participant role. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3–4), 347.Google Scholar
  87. Wachs, S., Junger, M., Sittichai, R., & Hogeveen, B. R. (2015). Traditional, cyber and combined bullying roles: Differences in risky online and offline activities. Societies, 5(1), 109–135.Google Scholar
  88. Wang, D. F., & Cui, H. (2006). Chinese openness: western openness personality dimension and Chinese personality. Journal of Southwest China Normal University.Google Scholar
  89. Wang, X., Lei, L., Liu, D., & Hu, H. (2016). Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 244–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.056.
  90. Wang, X., Lei, L., Yang, J., Gao, L., & Zhao, F. (2017a). Moral disengagement as mediator and moderator of the relation between empathy and aggression among Chinese male juvenile delinquents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(2), 316–326.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-016-0643-6.Google Scholar
  91. Wang, X., Yang, L., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017b). Trait anger and cyberbullying among young adults: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and moral identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 519–526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.073.Google Scholar
  92. Ward, D., & Beck, W. (1990). Gender and dishonesty. Journal of Social Psychology, 130(3), 333–339.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1990.9924589.Google Scholar
  93. Wong, D. S. W., Chan, H. C., & Cheng, C. H. K. (2014). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Children & Youth Services Review, 36(1), 133–140.Google Scholar
  94. Workman, M. (2012). Rash impulsivity, vengefulness, virtual-self and amplification of ethical relativism on cyber-smearing against corporations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 217–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.003.Google Scholar
  95. Yang, S. J., Stewart, R., Kim, J. M., Kim, S. W., Shin, I. S., Dewey, M. E., et al. (2013). Differences in predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying: A 2-year longitudinal study in korean school children. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 22(5), 309–318.Google Scholar
  96. Yao, R. S., & Liang, L. Y. (2010). Analysis of the application of simplified NEO-FFI to undergraduates. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(4), 457–459.Google Scholar
  97. Zhou, Z., Tang, H., Tian, Y., Wei, H., Zhang, F., & Morrison, C. M. (2013). Cyberbullying and its risk factors among chinese high school students. School Psychology International, 34(6), 630–647.Google Scholar
  98. Zych, I., Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Llorent, V. J. (2018). Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles. Aggression and Violent Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.004.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologySouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of EducationSouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
  3. 3.High School Affiliated to Southwest UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations