Advertisement

Online self-disclosure: Validation study of the French version of the real me on the net questionnaire

  • Marie DanetEmail author
  • Raphaële Miljkovitch
  • Anne-Sophie Deborde
Article

Abstract

Because online interactions are anonymous, they may facilitate self-disclosure. The Real Me on the Net questionnaire designed by Tosun and Lajunen assesses the tendency to reveal one’s inner world on the Internet rather than in face-to-face interactions. It provides information on whether participants feel more secure on the Internet in comparison to “real-life” interactions. The current study aims to test the construct validity of the French version of the Real Me on the Net. This study included 256 adults. Participants completed the self-report questionnaire anonymously. A confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the one-factor structure described by Tosun and Lajunen (Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 162–167, 2010). The French version of the Real Me on the Net has good internal consistency. This study confirms the good psychometric qualities of this self-report questionnaire. This instrument can be useful in investigations on Internet use motives.

Keywords

Self-disclosure Internet Real me Assessment Online relationships Anonymity 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

12144_2018_3_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

References

  1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). “On the internet no one knows I’m an introvert”: Extroversion, neuroticism, and internet interaction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, M., & Trevitt, J. (1991). Attachment behaviour and the schoolchild: An introduction to educational therapy. New York: Tavistock/Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A., Bałakier, E., & Boruch, W. (2016). Who discloses the most on Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 55(part B), 664–667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Centre de Recherche pour l’Etude et l’Observation des Conditions de vie. (2015). Baromètre numérique 2015 (Rapport d’enquête). Paris: Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes.Google Scholar
  6. Danet, M. (2014) Sphères d’influence des schémas d’attachement sur Internet et dans la vie quotidienne (Thèse de doctorat, sous la direction du Pr. R. Miljkovitch). Université Paris 8, Saint-Denis.Google Scholar
  7. Danet, M., & Miljkovitch, R. (2016). Etre soi-même sur le net : un facteur de risque à l’usage problématique d’Internet chez les personnes insécures. L’Encéphale: Revue de Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Thérapeutique, 42, 505–510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2015.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green, T., Wilhelmsen, T., Wilmots, E., Dodd, B., & Quinn, S. (2016). Social anxiety, attributes of online communication and self-disclosure across private and public Facebook communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 206–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IBM. (2014). Introduction to structural equation modeling using IBM SPSS Amos (v22), student guide, course code: 0G203. IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  11. Khazaal, Y., Billieux, J., Thorens, G., Khan, R., Louati, Y., Scarlatti, E., et al. (2008). French validation of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 703–706.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McKenna, K., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McKenna, K., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meganck, R., Markey, S., & Vanheule, S. (2012). Reliability and factor structure in an adolescent sample of the Dutch 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale. Psychological Reports, 111(2), 393–404.  https://doi.org/10.2466/02.08.15.PR0.111.5.393-404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller, L. C., Berg, J. H., & Archer, R. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1234–1244.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nosko, A., Wood, E., & Molema, S. (2010). All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 406–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory (Softcover edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin College Div.Google Scholar
  18. Ruppel, E. K., Gross, C., Stoll, A., Peck, B. S., Allen, M., & Kim, S. (2016). Reflecting on connecting: Meta-analysis of differences between computer-mediated and face-to-face self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 18–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tosun, L. P. (2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1510–1517.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tosun, L. P., & Lajunen, T. (2009). Why do young adults develop a passion for internet activities? The associations among personality, revealing “true self” on the internet, and passion for the internet. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 12(4), 401–406.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tosun, L. P., & Lajunen, T. (2010). Does internet use reflect your personality? Relationship between Eysenck’s personality dimensions and internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 162–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237–244.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu, S. (2014). Does low self-control explain voluntary disclosure of personal information on the internet? Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 210–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Lille, EA 4072 - PSITEC - Psychologie: Interactions, Temps, Émotions, CognitionLilleFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire Paragraphe, Equipe CRACUniversité Paris 8Saint-DenisFrance

Personalised recommendations