Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 1253–1257 | Cite as

Effect of Core Self-Evaluations on Research Performance among Chinese University Teachers

  • Yungui GuoEmail author
  • Yanting Zhu
  • Lihua Zhang
Article

Abstract

The present study explored the internal influence mechanism of core self-evaluations on research performance using hierarchical regression analysis and a bootstrap method. Participants were 364 university teachers from 9 universities in China, and they were measured by scales of core self-evaluations, research performance, creative self-efficacy and work engagement. The results indicated that core self-evaluations were positively correlated with university teachers’ research performance, while creative self-efficacy and work engagement mediate this correlation. Our study enrich the scholarly understanding on the correlation between core self-evaluations and job performance.

Keywords

Core self-evaluations Research performance Creative self-efficacy Work engagement Mediating role 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Chang, C. H., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Tan, J. A. (2012). Core self-evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 81–128.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiou, H. J. (2009). Quantitative research and statistical analysis. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Debusscher, J., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2015). The effect of state core self-evaluations on task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour, and counterproductive work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 301–315.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1063486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fong, C. T., & Ng, S. M. (2011). Measuring engagement at work: Validation of the chinese version of the utrecht work engagement scale. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 19(3), 391–397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Judge, T. A., & Hurst, C. (2007). Capitalizing on one’s advantages: Role of core self-evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1212–1227.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19(1), 151–188.Google Scholar
  7. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 303–331.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big five personality traits as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 215–232.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li, M., Liu, Y., Liu, L., & Wang, Z. (2016). Proactive personality and innovative work behavior: The mediating effects of affective states and creative self-efficacy in teachers. Current Psychology, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9457-8.
  10. Mathisen, G. E., & Bronnick, K. S. (2009). Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(1), 21–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire a cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tang, C., Liu, Y., & Wang, T. (2012). An empirical study of the relationship among charismatic leadership style, team identity and team creative performance in scientific teams. Science of Science and Management of S & T., 33(10), 155–162.Google Scholar
  18. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wan, Y. F. (2016). Universities won more than 70 percent of state industry reward. China Education Daily, 2016-1-9.Google Scholar
  21. Wang, Z., Sun, J. M., & Zhang, R. J. (2012). Effect of leader core self-evaluations on follower organizational citizenship behavior: The role of ethical leadership and collectivistic orientation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(9), 1231–1243.  https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, X. Y., Lin, S., & Chen, L. Y. (2013). Study on influencing mechanism of academic pressure on academic performance: The moderating effects of academic climate and emotional intelligence. Studies in Science of Science, 31(10), 1564–1571.Google Scholar
  23. Zhang, X., Biao, X. U., Peng, J. S., & Zhai, C. (2014). Effects of university teacher's academic pressure on research performance. Studies in Science of Science, 32(4), 549–558.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolGuangdong University of Foreign StudiesGuangzkouChina
  2. 2.School of Labor and Human ResourcesRenmin University of ChinaBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations