Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 966–981 | Cite as

The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale. The Development of a New Scale to Measure a New Construct

  • Giuseppe Craparo
  • Paola Magnano
  • Anna Paolillo
  • Valentina Costantino
Article

Abstract

Living in a risky society, in which risk and uncertainty are the rule rather than the exception implies that individuals need to develop new psychological resources to face unpredictable changes and to consider risk and uncertainty as opportunities. This study presents a new definition of the construct of Subjective Risk Intelligence and a new scale to measure this construct, composed of four dimensions: imaginative capability, problem-solving self-efficacy, positive attitude toward uncertainty, and emotional stress vulnerability. The structure and the concurrent and discriminant validity of the scale have been verified, and have demonstrated good psychometric features. Indications for future research and applications in interventions are provided.

Keywords

Risk intelligence Uncertainty Self-efficacy Problem solving Imaginative capability 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.Google Scholar
  2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723.Google Scholar
  3. Apgar, D. (2006). Risk intelligence: Learning to manage what we don’t know. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R. (1994). Advanced topics in structural equation models. In Advanced methods of marketing research, Edited by Richard P. Bagozzi, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers: 1–51.Google Scholar
  6. Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 45–87.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1992). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. In This chapter includes revised and expanded material presented as an invited address at the annual meeting of the British Psychological Society, St. Andrews, Scotland, Apr 1989. Hemisphere publishing Corp.Google Scholar
  8. Baron, R. A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 328–340.Google Scholar
  9. Bar-On, R. (1997). The emotional quotient inventory (EQ-i): Technical manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, Inc..Google Scholar
  10. Bar-On, R. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integral part of positive psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 54–62.Google Scholar
  11. Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Baumann, A. A., & Odum, A. L. (2012). Impulsivity, risk taking, and timing. Behavioural Processes, 90(3), 408–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.04.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Beaney, M. (2005). Imagination and creativity. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
  14. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.Google Scholar
  17. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
  18. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–600.Google Scholar
  19. Berenbaum, H., Bredemeier, K., & Thompson, R. J. (2008). Intolerance of uncertainty: Exploring its dimensionality and associations with need for cognitive closure, psychopathology, and personality. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 117–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.01.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Bernstein, P. L. (1996). Against the gods: The remarkable story of risk. Inc: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  21. Besser, A., & Shackelford, T. K. (2007). Mediation of the effects of the big five personality dimensions on negative mood and confirmed affective expectations by perceived situational stress: A quasi-field study of vacationers. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(7), 1333–1346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Betoret, F. D., & Artiga, A. G. (2010). Barriers perceived by teachers at work, coping strategies, self-efficacy and burnout. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(02), 637–654.Google Scholar
  23. Bimrose, J., & Hearne, L. (2012). Resilience and career adaptability: Qualitative studies of adult career counseling. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 338–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bimrose, J., Barnes, S. A., & Hughes, D. (2008). Adult career progression and advancement: A five year study of the effectiveness of guidance. Coventry: Warwick Institute for Employment Research and the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.Google Scholar
  25. Blalock, J., & Joiner, T. E. (2000). Interaction of cognitive avoidance coping and stress in predicting depression/anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 47–65.Google Scholar
  26. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Bright, J. E. H., & Pryor, R. G. L. (2005). The chaos theory of careers: A user’s guide. The Career Development Quarterly, 53, 291–305.Google Scholar
  28. Bright, J. E. H., & Pryor, R. G. L. (2008). Shiftwork: A chaos theory of careers agenda for change in career counselling. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(3), 168–177.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845310362221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bright, J. E. H., Pryor, R. G. L., & Harpham, L. (2005). The role of chance events in career decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 561–576.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bunevicius, A., Katkute, A., & Bunevicius, R. (2008). Symptoms of anxiety and depression in medical students and in humanities students: Relationship with big-five personality dimensions and vulnerability to stress. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 54(6), 494–501.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764008090843.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equations modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Cardena, E., Koopman, C., Classen, C., & Spiegel, D. (1996). Psychometric review of the Stanford acute stress reaction questionnaire (SASRQ). Measurement of stress, trauma, and adaptation. Sidran Press, Lutherville, 293-295.Google Scholar
  34. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1988). A control-process perspective on anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
  35. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: Which is a better predictor of student performance? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 521–531.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cheung, G. W. (2008). Testing equivalence in the structure, means, and variances of higher order constructs with structural equation modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 593–613.Google Scholar
  38. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Models, 9, 233–255.Google Scholar
  39. Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1080–1107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Craparo, G. (2015). Inconsci, coscienza e desiderio. Carocci: L’incertezza in psicoanalisi. Roma.Google Scholar
  41. Craparo, G. (2016). Elogio dell’incertezza. Saggi psicoanalitici. Milano: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  42. Craparo, G., Magnano, P., & Faraci, P. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of self-report emotional intelligence test (SREIT). TPM, 21(2), 121–133.Google Scholar
  43. Dewett, T. (2006). Exploring the role of risk in employee creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 27–45.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01265.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Douglas, M. (1990). Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus, 119, 1–16.Google Scholar
  45. Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Dugas, M. J., Letarte, H., Rhéaume, J., Freeston, M. H., & Ladouceur, R. (1995). Worry and problem solving: Evidence of a specific relationship. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19(1), 109–120.Google Scholar
  47. Dugas, M. J., Freeston, M. H., & Ladouceur, R. (1997). Intolerance of uncertainty and problem orientation in worry. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21(6), 593–606.Google Scholar
  48. Dugas, M. J., Gosselin, P., & Ladouceur, R. (2001). Intolerance of uncertainty and worry: Investigating specificity in a nonclinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(5), 551–558.Google Scholar
  49. Dugas, M. J., Buhr, K., & Ladouceur, R. (2004). The role of intolerance of uncertainty in etiology and maintenance. In R. G. Heimberg, C. L. Turk, & D. S. Mennin (Eds.), Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice (pp. 143–163). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ee, J., Seng, T. O., & Kwang, N. A. (2007). Styles of creativity: Adaptors and innovators in a Singapore context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3), 364–373.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Evans, D. (2012). Risk Intelligence. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Risk Theory (pp. 604–620). Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5.
  52. Eysenck, H. J., & Furnham, A. (1993). Personality and the Barron-welsh art scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 837–838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Fidler, L. A., & Johnson, J. D. (1984). Communication and innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 9, 704–711.Google Scholar
  54. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.Google Scholar
  55. Folkmann, M. N. (2010). Enabling creativity. Imagination in design processes. Paper presented at the 1st international conference on design creativity ICDC, Kobe, Japan.Google Scholar
  56. Foo, M. D. (2011). Emotions and entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 375–393.Google Scholar
  57. Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.Google Scholar
  58. Fuller, A. & Paton, K. (2007). Barriers’ to Participation in Higher Education? Depends who you ask and how. Paper presented at BERA Annual Conference, London 6-8 September.Google Scholar
  59. Funston, F., & Wagner, S. (2010). Surviving and thriving in uncertainty: Creating the risk intelligent enterprise. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–617.Google Scholar
  61. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  62. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472–485.Google Scholar
  63. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Greco, V., & Roger, D. (2003). Uncertainty, stress, and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1057–1068.Google Scholar
  65. Guastello, S. J., Guastello, D. D., & Hanson, C. A. (2004). Creativity, mood disorders, and emotional intelligence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(4), 260–281.Google Scholar
  66. Guido, G., Peluso, A. M., Capestro, M., & Miglietta, M. (2015). An Italian version of the 10-item big five inventory: An application to hedonic and utilitarian shopping values. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 135–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  68. Hendrickx, L., & Vlek, C. (1991). Perceived control, nature of risk information, and risk taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 235–247.Google Scholar
  69. Hodson, G., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1999). Uncertainty orientation and the big five personality structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(2), 253–261.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1986). Personality, coping, and family resources in stress resistance: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Phillips, J. M., & Hedlund, J. (1994). Decision risk in dynamic two- stage contexts: Beyond the status quo. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 592–598.Google Scholar
  72. Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement equivalence in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Jackson, J., Allum, N., & Gaskell, G. (2006). Bridging levels of analysis in risk perception research : The case of the fear of crime. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  74. Jalan, A., & Kleiner, B. H. (1995). New developments in developing creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10, 20–23.Google Scholar
  75. Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195–213). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). L1SREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc..Google Scholar
  77. Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big five personality traits as the predictors of creative self efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 215–232.Google Scholar
  79. Kelly, K. E. (2006). Relationship between the five-factor model of personality and the scale of creative attributes and behavior: A validation study. Individual Differences Research, 4, 299–305.Google Scholar
  80. King, L. A., McKee Walker, L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 203, 189–203.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kirton, M. J. (1999). Kirton adaption-innovation inventory manual (3rd ed.). Berkhamsted: Occupational Research Center.Google Scholar
  82. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner and Marx.Google Scholar
  83. Krell, E. (2010). Risk chat: What is risk intelligence? http://Businessfinancemag.Com/Article/Riskchat-What-Risk- intelligence-0621.
  84. Krueger, N. J., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385–400.Google Scholar
  85. Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., Mellers, B. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The agony of victory and thrill of defeat: Mixed emotional reactions to disappointing wins and relieving losses. Psychological Science, 15(5), 325–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Leccardi, C. (2006). Facing uncertainty, temporality and biographies in the new century. In C. Leccardi & R. Elisabetta (Eds.), A new youth? Young people, generations and family life (pp. 15–40). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  87. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 473–493.Google Scholar
  88. Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Lin, W. S., Hsu, Y., & Liang, C. (2014). The mediator effects of conceiving imagination on academic performance of design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 73–89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9244-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Lion, R., Meertens, R. M., & Bot, I. (2002). Priorities in information desire about unknown risks. Risk Analysis, 22, 765–776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Magnano, P., Paolillo, A., Platania, S., & Santisi, G. (2017). Courage as a potential mediator between personality and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 13–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74, 403–456.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00380.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Martindale, C., & Dailey, A. (1996). Creativity. Primary process cognition and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 409–414.Google Scholar
  94. Martuccelli, D. (2006). Forgé par l’Épreuve. L’Individu dans la France Contemporaine. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  95. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.Google Scholar
  96. Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., & Weber, E. U. (1997). Do risk attitudes reflect in the eye of the beholder? In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision and measurement (pp. 57–71). New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  98. Meredith, M. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.Google Scholar
  99. Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., & Menil, C. (2006). Predicting resistance to stress: Incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence over alexithymia and optimism. Psicothema, 18(Suplemento), 79-88.Google Scholar
  100. Mishra, S., & Lalumière, M. L. (2011). Individual differences in risk-propensity: Associations between personality and behavioral measures of risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 869–873.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Mousavi, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1671–1678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Mullen, M. R. (1995). Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 573–596.Google Scholar
  103. Myers, J. R., Henderson-King, D. H., & Henderson-King, E. I. (1997). Facing technological risks: The importance of individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 1–20.Google Scholar
  104. Nakata, C., & Sivakumar, K. (1996). National culture and new product development: An integrative review. The Journal of Marketing, 60, 61–72.Google Scholar
  105. Nicholson, N., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Soane, E., & Willman, P. (2002). Risk propensity and personality. London Business School, Open University Business School and Said Business School Oxford, London.Google Scholar
  106. Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000123856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Pastorelli, C., Vecchio, G. M., & Boda, G. (2001). Autoefficacia nelle life skills: soluzione dei problemi e comunicazione interpersonale. In G. V. Caprara (Ed.), La Valutazione dell’Autoefficacia (pp. 137–146). Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar
  108. Pavlova, E. M., & Kornilova, T. V. (2013). Creativity and tolerance for uncertainty predict the engagement of emotional intelligence in personal decision making. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 6(4), 34–46.  10.11621/pir.2013.0403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Pennings, J. M. E., & Smidts, A. (2000). Assessing the construct validity of risk attitude. Management Science, 46(10), 1337–1348.Google Scholar
  110. Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence: Behavioral validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39–57.Google Scholar
  111. Podoynitsyna, K., Van der Bij, H., & Song, M. (2012). The role of mixed emotions in the risk perception of novice and serial entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(1), 115–140.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00476.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Polman, R., Borkoles, E., & Nicholls, A. R. (2010). Type D personality, stress, and symptoms of burnout: The influence of avoidance coping and social support. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(3), 681–696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Raffaelli, M., & Crockett, L. J. (2003). Sexual risk taking in adolescence: The role of self-regulation and attraction to risk. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 1036–1046.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Raykov, T. (1998). Coefficient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated non homogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 375–385.Google Scholar
  116. Reiter-Palmon, R., Illies, J. J., & Kobe-Cross, L. M. (2009). Conscientiousness is not always a good predictor of performance: The case of creativity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19(2), 27–45.Google Scholar
  117. Rohrmann, B. (2005). Risk Attitude Scales: Concepts, Questionnaires, Utilizations. Project Report: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  118. Runco, M. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  120. Salanova, M., Grau, R., & Martinez, I. (2005). Demandas laborales y conductas de afrontamiento: El rol modulador de la autoeficacia profesional [labour demands and coping behavior: The modulator role of the professional self-efficacy]. Psicothema, 17(3), 390–395.Google Scholar
  121. Salovey, P., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Mayer, J. D. (1999). Coping intelligently. Coping, 141–164.Google Scholar
  122. Sánchez-Ruiz, M. J., Hernández-Torrano, D., Pérez-González, J. C., Batey, M., & Petrides, K. V. (2011). The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and creativity across subject domains. Motivation and Emotion, 35(4), 461–473.Google Scholar
  123. Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 661–673.Google Scholar
  124. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & al. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.Google Scholar
  125. Schwarzer, R. (2014). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  126. Schwarzer, R., Knoll, N., & Rieckmann, N. (2004). Social support. Health psychology, 158, 181. (Book).Google Scholar
  127. Sen, A. K., & Hagtvet, K. A. (1993). Correlations among creativity, intelligence, personality, and academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 497–498.Google Scholar
  128. Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483–503.Google Scholar
  129. Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.Google Scholar
  130. Sica, C., Magni, C., Ghisi, M., Altoè, G., & Sighinolfi, C. (2008). Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced-Nuova Versione Italiana (COPE-NVI): uno strumento per la misura degli stili di coping. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 14, 27–53.Google Scholar
  131. Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1087–1090.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Singh, J. (1995). Measurement issues in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 597–619.Google Scholar
  133. Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of risky decision making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1573–1592.Google Scholar
  134. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322–325.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sorrentino, R. M., & Short, J. C. (1986). Uncertainty orientation, motivation, and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 379–403). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  137. Sorrentino, R. M., Hewitt, E. C., & Raso-Knott, P. A. (1992). Risk-taking in games of chance and skill: Informational and affective influences on choice behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 522–533.Google Scholar
  138. Stavridou, A., & Furnham, A. (1996). The relationship between psychoticism, trait-creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 143–153.Google Scholar
  139. Steenkamp, J.-B., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-National Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–107.Google Scholar
  140. Steiger, J. H. (1989). EzPATH: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. Evanston: SYSTAT.Google Scholar
  141. Suls, J. (2001). Affect, stress, and personality. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 392–409). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  142. Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do big five personality factors affect individual creativity ? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(7), 941–956.  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., & Klein, S. R. (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 27–41.Google Scholar
  144. Townsend, D. (2003). Cohen on Kant’s aesthetic judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics, 43(1), 75–79.Google Scholar
  145. Vanderberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.Google Scholar
  146. Vieira, M. M., Pappàmikail, L., & Resende, J. (2013). Forced to deal with the future: Uncertainty and risk in vocational choices among Portuguese secondary school students. The Sociological Review, 61(4), 745–768.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Vlek, C., & Stallen, P. J. (1981). Judging risk and benefits in the small and in the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 235–271.Google Scholar
  148. Vollrath, M., & Torgersen, S. (2000). Personality types and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 367–378.Google Scholar
  149. Volz, K. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). Cognitive processes in decisions under risk are not the same as in decisions under uncertainty. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15(4), 297–310.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Wyatt, G. (1990). Risk-taking and risk-avoiding behavior: The impact of some dispositional and situational variables. The Journal of Psychology, 124, 437–447.Google Scholar
  152. Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 259–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.Google Scholar
  155. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  156. Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation-seeking and risky behavior. Washington: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Craparo
    • 1
  • Paola Magnano
    • 1
  • Anna Paolillo
    • 2
  • Valentina Costantino
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Human and Social SciencesKore UniversityEnnaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Education and PsychologyUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations