Psychometric Properties of the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised in Chinese Young Adults
- 173 Downloads
This study aimed to assess the reliability and construct validity of the Chinese version TCI-R-240 in young adults. The 545 young adults completed the Chinese version of TCI-R-240, as well as self-report measures of subjective health (SHC), life satisfaction (SWLS), and Big-Five personality traits (Mini-IPIP). The TCI-R-240 showed high internal consistency reliabilities for all seven dimensions with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients from 0.68 to 0.88. The postulated four-factor structure of temperament and three-factor structure of character was confirmed by factor analysis and principal component analysis. The concurrent validity of the TCI-R-240 has been supported by meaningful correlations with subjective health, life satisfaction and Mini-IPIP. In line with previous studies, the strongest correlations concerning subjective health were negative correlation with Harm Avoidance and positive correlation with Self-directedness. Furthermore, life satisfaction was positively correlated with Self-directedness, Persistence, and Self-transcendence. The Agreeableness dimension was positively correlated with Reward Dependence. The Neuroticism dimension was positively correlated with Harm Avoidance and negative correlation with Self-directedness. The results suggested that the Chinese version of the TCI-R is a valid and reliable measure of temperament and character in young adults.
KeywordsTCI Temperament Reliability Validity Young Adults
This study was funded by the National Social Science Foundation for Young Scholars in Educational Science of China (grant number CBA120108).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Written consent was obtained from each participant after a full explanation of the study procedure. Parents/guardians of participants under 18 years old were informed, and their consent was obtained.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
- Aluja, A., Blanch, A., Gallart, S., & Dolcet, J. M. (2010). The temperament and character inventory revised (TCI-R): Descriptive and factor structure in different age levels. Behavioral Psychology, 18(2), 385–402.Google Scholar
- Andriola, E., Donfrancesco, R., Zaninotto, S., Di Trani, M., Cruciani, A. C., Innocenzi, M., & Cloninger, C. R. (2012). The junior temperament and character inventory: Italian validation of a questionnaire for the measurement of personality from ages 6 to 16 years. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 6(53), 884–892.Google Scholar
- Brändström, S., Sigvardsson, S., Nylander, P. O., & Richter, J. (2008). The Swedish version of the temperament and character inventory (TCI). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 14–21.Google Scholar
- Cabrera-Nguyen, P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results in the journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1, 99–103.Google Scholar
- Cai, Q. X., Liu, H., Shao, Y., et al. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the temperament and character inventory-revise(TCI-R) 240. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science, 23(8), 755–759.Google Scholar
- Cattell, R. B. (1966). Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Cloninger C. R. (1999). The temperament and character inventory-revised (TCI-R). St. Louise, (Mo): Center for Psychobiology of personality, Washington University.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., Maccallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.Google Scholar
- Fountoulakis, K. N., Rozsa, S., Siamouli, M., Moutou, K., Pantoula, E., & Cloninger, C. R. (2015). Standardization and normative data of the Greek version of the temperament and character inventory (TCI). Annals of General Psychiatry, 14(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Garcia, D., & Moradi, S. (2012). Adolescents’ temperament and character: A longitudinal study on happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(5), 931–946.Google Scholar
- Gutierrez-Zotes, A., Labad, J., Martorell, L., Gaviria, A., Bayón, C., Vilella, E., & Cloninger, C. R. (2015). The revised temperament and character inventory: Normative data by sex and age from a Spanish normal randomized sample. Peer J, 3, e1481. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huff, B. I. (2015). Eudaimonism in the mencius : Fulfilling the heart. Dao,14(3), 403-431.Google Scholar
- Jaksic, N., Aukstmargetic, B., Rózsa, S., Brajkovic, L., Jovanovic, N., Vuksancusa, B., et al. (2015). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the temperament and character inventory-revised (TCI-R) in a croatian psychiatric outpatient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 57(37), 177–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee, S. J., Cloninger, C. R., & Chae, H. (2015). Cloninger's temperament and character traits in medical students of Korea with problem eating behaviors.Comprehensive. Psychiatry, 59(8), 98–106.Google Scholar
- Lester, N., Garcia, D., Lundström, S., Brändström, S., Råstam, M., Kerekes, N., & Anckarsäter, H. (2016). The genetic and environmental structure of the character sub-scales of the temperament and character inventory in adolescence. Annals of General Psychiatry, 15(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
- Martinotti, G., Mandelli, L., Di Nicola, M., Serretti, A., Fossati, A., Borroni, S., & Janiri, L. (2008). Psychometric characteristic of the Italian version of the temperament and character inventory--revised, personality, psychopathology, and attachment styles. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49(5), 514–522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olvera, R. L., Fonseca, M., Caetano, S. C., Hatch, J. P., Hunter, K., Nicoletti, M., & Soares, J. C. (2009). Assessment of personality dimensions in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder using the junior temperament and character inventory. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 19(1), 13–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23–74.Google Scholar
- Wang, D., Hu, M., Zheng, C., & Liu, Z. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Chinese shortened version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman personality questionnaire in a sample of adolescents and young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00349.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.Google Scholar
- Xiong, C., & Xu, Y. (2009). Reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale for Chinese people. China Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 948–949.Google Scholar