Measurements of Intelligence in sub-Saharan Africa: Perspectives Gathered from Research in Mali
One of the most controversial debates around intelligence testing regards how tests are used to measure intelligence among non-Western populations. Studies conducted since the 1930’s consistently indicate significant sub-average intelligence among African populations. The purpose of this study is to examine whether commonly used intelligence tests such as the Ravens Progressive Matrices are valid indices of cognitive functioning among children in Mali, Africa. Participants in the current study were 206 children from Mali attending French-language schools. The Woodcock-Johnson II math assessment was used to measure participants’ academic achievement. The Vineland II- Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS) was used to indicate their adaptive functioning level. In this study, tests of IQ were compared against adaptive functioning and academic achievement, to examine whether IQ scores measured among African populations are artificially low or are an accurate measure of performance. IQ scores as measured by the Ravens were discrepant with standardized scores on math achievement and adaptive functioning. Results indicate that use of the Ravens may substantially underestimate the intelligence of children in Mali. This can be particularly problematic when comparisons are made across cultures using the same test and norms. . It is recommended that tests developed with local normative samples be used to assess for IQ.
KeywordsIntelligence Child development Cross-cultural Testing Africa
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
None to declare for either author.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual – IV –TR. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Anum, A. (2014). A standardization study of the Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices in Ghana. IFE PsychologIA, 22(2), 27–35.Google Scholar
- Court, J. H. (1983). Sex differences in performances on Raven’s Progressive Matrices: A review. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29, 54–74.Google Scholar
- Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Lichtwark, I. T., Starkey, N. J., & Barker-Collo, S. (2013). Further validation of the New Zealand Test of Adult Reading (NZART) as a measure of premorbid IQ in a New Zealand sample. New Zealand Journal Of Psychology, 42(3), 75–83.Google Scholar
- Lynn, R., Abdalla, S., & Al-Shahomee, A. (2008). Norms for the Progressive Matrices for Libya and Tunisia. Mankind Quarterly 49(3), 71–77.Google Scholar
- Maulik, P. K., Harbour, C. K. (2010). Epidemiology of intellectual disability. International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation, 2. http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/en/article/144/. Access 3 April 2017.
- McGrew, K., Schrank, F., & Woodcock, R. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III: Normative update. Rolling Meadows: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
- Raven, J., & Court, J. H. (1989). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and vocabulary scales. London: Lewis.Google Scholar
- Raven, J., et al. (1990). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and vocabulary scales: Research supplement no. 3: American and international norms. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Rindermann, H., Falkenhayn, L., & Baumeister, A. E. (2014). Cognitive ability and epistemic rationality: A study in Nigeria and Germany. Intelligence, 4723–4733. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.08.006.
- Rushton, J. P. (2008). Testing the genetic hypothesis of group mean IQ differences in South Africa: Racial admixture and cross-situational consistency. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 768–776. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.011.
- Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (1992). International classification of diseases–tenth Revision. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar