Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 520–527 | Cite as

Individual Differences in Affective Priming Effects: Any Links with Personality and Trait Affectivity?

  • Blaž Rebernjak
  • Vesna Buško
Article

Abstract

Processing tendencies refer to individual differences in the automatic processing of affective stimuli. Using the affective priming paradigm one can tap these processing tendencies and differentiate positive and negative affective priming scores. In this study we used a classical evaluative decision task with nouns as primes and adjectives as targets to assess individual differences in positive and negative affective priming in two time points. Using Steyer’s (Steyer et al. in Methods of Psychological Research Online 2(1), 21–33, 1997) true intraindividual change modeling approach, the positive and negative priming scores were defined on a latent level. No significant relationships were found between positive affective priming and trait positive affect nor extraversion, as well as between negative affective priming and trait negative affect and neuroticism. As these findings are not in line with previous research (Robinson et al. in Emotion 10(5), 615–626, 2010; Robinson et al. in Personality and Individual Differences 42(7), 1221–1231, 2007) possible moderating influences are discussed.

Keywords

Processing tendencies Affective priming Positive affect Negative affect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was conducted as a part of the research project No. 130-1301683-1402 “Measuring Latent Psychological Attributes: Person Dispositions and Processes,” led by the second author of this paper and supported by Ministry of Science, Education, and Sports of the Republic of Croatia.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Blaž Rebernjak declares that he has no conflict of interest. Vesna Buško declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 893–912.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(1), 104–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings (pp. 1–45). Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure" change": or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74(1), 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Mornay Davies, P. (1998). Automatic semantic priming: the contribution of lexical- and semantic-level processes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Degner, J. (2009). On the (un-) controllability of affective priming: strategic manipulation is feasible but can possibly be prevented. Cognition and Emotion, 23(2), 327–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duckworth, K. L., Bargh, J. A., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 513–519.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferguson, M. J. (2007). On the automatic evaluation of end-states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 596–611.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 557–572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Giner-Sorolla, R., García, M. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The automatic evaluation of pictures. Social Cognition, 17(1), 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8(3), 249–266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal. System (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022–1038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., & Liu, T. J. (1989). Unconscious processing of dichoptically masked words. Memory & Cognition, 17(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hermans, D., Houwer, J. D., & Eelen, P. (1994). The affective priming effect: automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Cognition & Emotion, 8(6), 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2001). A time course analysis of the affective priming effect. Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (2004) LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Kemp-Wheeler, S. M., & Hill, A. B. (1992). Semantic and emotional priming below objective detection threshold. Cognition & Emotion, 6(2), 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klauer, K. C., & Musch, J. (2001). Does sunshine prime loyal? Affective priming in the naming task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 54(3), 727–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klauer, K. C., Roßnagel, C., & Musch, J. (1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(1), 246–255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Klauer, K. C., Becker, M., & Spruyt, A. (2016). Evaluative priming in the pronunciation task. Experimental Psychology, 63(1), 70–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Krizmanić, V. (2013). Temperament i odnos pozitivnih i negativnih temeljnih afekata u kontekstu dinamičkog modela afekata (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb.Google Scholar
  26. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. The center for research in psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  27. McRae, K., & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 558–572.Google Scholar
  28. Mlačić, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). An analysis of a cross-cultural personality inventory: the IPIP big-five factor markers in Croatia. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 168–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Peter, J. P., Churchill Jr., G. A., & Brown, T. J. (1993). Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 655–662.Google Scholar
  30. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quirin, M., Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2009). When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: the implicit positive and negative affect test (IPANAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 500–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rebernjak, B., & Buško, V. (2013). Modeling individual differences in automatic evaluation measured by evaluative decision task. Journal of Individual Differences, 34(3), 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robinson, M. D., & Kirkeby, B. S. (2005). Happiness as a belief system: individual differences and priming in emotion judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1134–1144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Robinson, M. D., Vargas, P. T., & Crawford, E. G. (2003). Putting process into personality, appraisal, and emotion: evaluative processing as a missing link. In J. Musch & C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: affective processes in cognition and motion. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Robinson, M. D., Ode, S., Moeller, S. K., & Goetz, P. W. (2007). Neuroticism and affective priming: evidence for a neuroticism-linked negative schema. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(7), 1221–1231.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Robinson, M. D., Moeller, S. K., & Ode, S. (2010). Extraversion and reward-related processing: probing incentive motivation in affective priming tasks. Emotion, 10(5), 615–626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45(9), 1043–1056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rusting, C. L. (1998). Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 165–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rusting, C. L. (1999). Interactive effects of personality and mood on emotion-congruent memory and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1073–1086.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
  41. Shelton, J. R., & Martin, R. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(6), 1191–1210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., Houwer, J. D., & Eelen, P. (2002). On the nature of the affective priming effect: affective priming of naming responses. Social Cognition, 20(3), 227–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., Pandelaere, M., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2004). On the replicability of the affective priming effect in the pronunciation task. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 109–115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Steyer, R., Ferring, D., & Schmitt, M. J. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 79–98.Google Scholar
  45. Steyer, R., Eid, M., & Schwenkmezger, P. (1997). Modeling true intraindividual change: true change as a latent variable. Methods of Psychological Research. Online, 2(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
  46. Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13(5), 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wentura, D. (1999). Activation and inhibition of affective information: for negative priming in the evaluation task. Cognition & Emotion, 13(1), 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations