Individual Differences in Affective Priming Effects: Any Links with Personality and Trait Affectivity?
Processing tendencies refer to individual differences in the automatic processing of affective stimuli. Using the affective priming paradigm one can tap these processing tendencies and differentiate positive and negative affective priming scores. In this study we used a classical evaluative decision task with nouns as primes and adjectives as targets to assess individual differences in positive and negative affective priming in two time points. Using Steyer’s (Steyer et al. in Methods of Psychological Research Online 2(1), 21–33, 1997) true intraindividual change modeling approach, the positive and negative priming scores were defined on a latent level. No significant relationships were found between positive affective priming and trait positive affect nor extraversion, as well as between negative affective priming and trait negative affect and neuroticism. As these findings are not in line with previous research (Robinson et al. in Emotion 10(5), 615–626, 2010; Robinson et al. in Personality and Individual Differences 42(7), 1221–1231, 2007) possible moderating influences are discussed.
KeywordsProcessing tendencies Affective priming Positive affect Negative affect
The study was conducted as a part of the research project No. 130-1301683-1402 “Measuring Latent Psychological Attributes: Person Dispositions and Processes,” led by the second author of this paper and supported by Ministry of Science, Education, and Sports of the Republic of Croatia.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Blaž Rebernjak declares that he has no conflict of interest. Vesna Buško declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings (pp. 1–45). Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
- Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal. System (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (2004) LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
- Krizmanić, V. (2013). Temperament i odnos pozitivnih i negativnih temeljnih afekata u kontekstu dinamičkog modela afekata (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb.Google Scholar
- Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. The center for research in psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
- McRae, K., & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 558–572.Google Scholar
- Peter, J. P., Churchill Jr., G. A., & Brown, T. J. (1993). Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 655–662.Google Scholar
- Robinson, M. D., Vargas, P. T., & Crawford, E. G. (2003). Putting process into personality, appraisal, and emotion: evaluative processing as a missing link. In J. Musch & C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: affective processes in cognition and motion. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
- Steyer, R., Ferring, D., & Schmitt, M. J. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 79–98.Google Scholar
- Steyer, R., Eid, M., & Schwenkmezger, P. (1997). Modeling true intraindividual change: true change as a latent variable. Methods of Psychological Research. Online, 2(1), 21–33.Google Scholar