Current Psychology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 225–233 | Cite as

Investigating pro-Environmental Behaviors of Lithuanian University Students

Article
First Online:

Abstract

In the light of global environmental problems, investigating pro-environmental behaviors is becoming increasingly popular and relevant. The present study is aimed at investigating some of the most common pro-environmental behaviors (recycling, using environmentally friendly transportation, conserving water, and conserving electricity) of Lithuanian university students. A total of 282 university students from several Lithuanian universities enrolled in various study programs participated in the survey. Participants filled in measures based on the theory of planned behavior, as well as measures for their value orientations and their perceived descriptive norms of pro-environmental behaviors. The results showed that perceived behavioral control and personal norms towards sustainable behaviors more or less consistently predict the investigated behaviors, while attitudes towards behavior do not necessarily translate into behavioral intentions; moreover the role of value orientations or perceived descriptive norms might not be that substantial in understanding pro-environmental behaviors. Some suggestions for future research and for promoting pro-environmental behavior are presented.

Keywords

Sustainability Theory of planned behavior Norms Values Environment Pro-environmental behavior 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Aguilar-Luzón, M. D. C., García-Martínez, J. M. Á., Calvo-Salguero, A., & Salinas, J. M. (2012). Comparative study between the theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm model regarding the environment, on Spanish housewives’ recycling behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2797–2833. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00962.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behaviour through free-choice learning experiences: what is the state of the game? Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 281–295. doi: 10.1080/13504620500081145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2011). Using tourism free-choice learning experiences to promote environmentally sustainable behaviour: the role of post-visit “action resources.”. Environmental Education Research, 17(2), 201–215. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2010.530645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohner, G., & Schlüter, L. E. (2014). A room with a viewpoint revisited: Descriptive norms and hotel guests’ towel reuse behavior. PloS One, 9(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104086.
  7. Chan, L., & Bishop, B. (2013). A moral basis for recycling: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dagiliūtė, R., & Liobikienė, G. (2015). University contributions to environmental sustainability: challenges and opportunities from the Lithuanian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 891–899. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 368–378. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donald, I. J., Cooper, S. R., & Conchie, S. M. (2014). An extended theory of planned behaviour model of the psychological factors affecting commuters’ transport mode use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dwyer, P. C., Maki, A., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Promoting energy conservation behavior in public settings : The influence of social norms and personal responsibility. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41(1), 30–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: the influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1135–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fekadu, Z., & Kraft, P. (2002). Expanding the theory of planned behaviour: the role of social norms and group identification. Journal of Health Psychology, 7(1), 33–43. doi: 10.1177/1359105302007001650.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Göckeritz, S., Schultz, P. W., Rendón, T., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2010). Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: The moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 514–523. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.643.Google Scholar
  16. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482. doi: 10.1086/586910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greaves, M., Zibarras, L. D., & Stride, C. (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 109–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2008). Social norms: an underestimated and underemployed lever for managing climate change. International Journal of Sustainability Communication, 3(2008), 5–13 Retrieved from http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/municipal/MUNIdocs/SocialNormsResearch.pdf.Google Scholar
  19. Griskevicius, V., Cantú, S. M., & Vugt, M. V. (2012). The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: Implications for marketing, policy, and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 115–128. doi: 10.1509/jppm.11.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huijts, N. M. a., Molin, E. J. E., & van Wee, B. (2014). Hydrogen fuel station acceptance: A structural equation model based on the technology acceptance framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 153–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iveroth, E., & Bengtsson, F. (2014). Changing behavior towards sustainable practices using Information Technology. Journal of Environmental Management, 139, 59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.054.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jakovcevic, A., & Steg, L. (2013). Sustainable transportation in Argentina: Values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 20, 70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2013.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaiser, F. G., Hubner, G., & Bogner, F. X. (2005). Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(10), 2150–2170. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02213.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 1002–1012. doi: 10.1177/01461672002610009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, K. (2011). The role of media exposure, social exposure and biospheric value orientation in the environmental attitude-intention-behavior model in adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 301–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liobikienė, G., & Juknys, R. (2016). The role of values, environmental risk perception, awareness of consequences, and willingness to assume responsibility for environmentally-friendly behaviour: the Lithuanian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(2000), 3413–3422. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, X., Wang, C., Shishime, T., & Fujitsuka, T. (2012). Sustainable consumption: Green purchasing behaviours of urban residents in China. Sustainable Development, 20(4), 293–308. doi: 10.1002/sd.484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matthies, E., Selge, S., & Klöckner, C. a. (2012). The role of parental behaviour for the development of behaviour specific environmental norms – The example of recycling and re-use behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oreg, S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally: Values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environment and Behavior, 38(4), 462–483. doi: 10.1177/0013916505286012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paillé, P., & Boiral, O. (2013). Pro-environmental behavior at work: Construct validity and determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 118–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22(3), 218–233. doi: 10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sahin, E., Ertepinar, H., & Teksoz, G. (2012). University students’ behaviors pertaining to sustainability: A structural equation model with sustainability-related attributes. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(3), 459–478 Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ990528.Google Scholar
  34. Schultz, W. P., Khazian, A. M., & Zaleski, A. C. (2008). Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence, 3(1), 4–23. doi: 10.1080/15534510701755614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwartz, S. H. (1973). Normative explanations of helping behavior: a critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(4), 349–364. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(73)90071-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
  37. Spence, A., Leygue, C., Bedwell, B., & O’Malley, C. (2014). Engaging with energy reduction: Does a climate change frame have the potential for achieving broader sustainable behaviour? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thøgersen, J. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: an extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 247–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Read, A. D. (2004). Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41(3), 191–214. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Riper, C. J., & Kyle, G. T. (2014). Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement in a national park: A latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., & Yu, A. (2014). The moderating effect of perceived policy effectiveness on recycling intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Webb, D., Soutar, G. N., Mazzarol, T., & Saldaris, P. (2013). Self-determination theory and consumer behavioural change: Evidence from a household energy-saving behaviour study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20–31. doi: 10.1002/sd.394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyMykolas Romeris UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations