Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 58–64 | Cite as

Emotion and the False Consensus Effect

  • Martin D. ColemanEmail author
Article

Abstract

The influence of emotion on the false consensus effect was investigated. Participants were recruited from an undergraduate population. There were 210 participants (89 male) with a mean age of 19.25 years. The study took place online. Participants made a choice between two forms of vacation, and were induced to feel an emotion (happiness, neutral, or sadness). They were then asked to estimate the percentage of people who would opt for either the same choice as them or the alternate choice, and to make an attribution for this predicted behavior. Results revealed a false consensus effect (estimates of a vacation’s popularity were higher from participants who preferred that option than from participants who preferred the alternative option), an influence of emotion on consensus estimates (participants experiencing happiness made higher estimates of consensus than participants experiencing sadness), and an influence of emotion on attribution. Results were consistent with valence-based theoretical accounts of emotional influence.

Keywords

Attributions Emotions Judgment Decision making 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgardner, A. H., & Arkin, R. M. (1988). Affective state mediates causal attributions for success and failure. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, C. E. (1982). A false consensus bias in 1980 presidential preferences. Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 137–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambers, J. R. (2008). Explaining false uniqueness: Why we are both better and worse than others. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 878–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, M. D. (2011). Emotion and the self-serving bias. Current Psychology, 30, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, M. D. (2013). Emotion and the ultimate attribution error. Current Psychology, 32, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forgas, J. P. (1998). On being happy and mistaken: mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 318–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Forgas, J. P., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Mood effects on person perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 53–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Forgas, J. P., & Locke, J. (2005). Affective influences on causal inferences: the effects of mood on attributions for positive and negative interpersonal episodes. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1071–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Worren, N. M., Baker, L., & Vallerand, R. J. (1995). False consensus effects for the 1992 Canadian referendum. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 214–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. Gainesville: University of Florida.Google Scholar
  14. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Niedenthal, P. M., & Setterlund, M. B. (1994). Emotion congruence in perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pronin, E., Lin, D., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramsey, S. R., Thompson, K. L., McKenzie, M., & Rosenbaum, A. (2016). Psychological research in the internet age: the quality of web-based data. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwartz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Templer, K. J., & Lange, S. R. (2008). Internet testing: equivalence between proctored lab and unproctored field conditions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1216–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Uvacsek, M., Nepusz, T., Naughton, D. P., Mazanof, J., Ránky, M. Z., & Petróczi, A. (2011). Self-admitted behavior and perceived use of performance-enhancing vs psychoactive drugs among competitive athletes. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 21, 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wolfson, S. (2000). Students’ estimates of the prevalence of drug use: evidence for a false consensus effect. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 295–298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations