Current Psychology

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 453–467 | Cite as

Understanding “His and Her” Work-Family Conflict and Facilitation

  • Rachel R. Stoiko
  • JoNell Strough
  • Nicolas A. Turiano
Article

Abstract

Work-family conflict (negative spillover between work and family) and work-family facilitation (positive spillover between work and family) are two aspects of the work-family interface. Prior work has established that these constructs are statistically and conceptually distinct, but less is known about what work and family characteristics are associated with conflict versus facilitation. Understanding who is most at risk for conflict and most benefiting from facilitation is necessary for establishing effective workplace policies. We used structural equation modeling to determine whether (1) work-family conflict and facilitation have different (statistical) predictors, and (2) whether these predictive relations are moderated by gender. Perceiving more work demands predicted greater work-family conflict, but was unrelated to facilitation. Perceiving more skill discretion at work and being married predicted greater work-family facilitation, but was unrelated to work-family conflict. Perceiving more decision authority and social support at work, and having more children, predicted less conflict and more facilitation. Most predictors were stronger for men than for women. We discuss implications of these results for designing effective policies to increase work-family facilitation and decrease work-family conflict for men and women.

Keywords

Work-family interface Work-family conflict Work family facilitation Gender differences 

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work and family: an expansionist theory. The American Psychologist, 56(10), 781–796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson, J., & Fleishman, J. A. (1994). The robustness of maximum likelihood and distribution-free estimators to non-normality in confirmatory factor analysis. Quality and Quantity, 28(2), 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brough, P., & O’Driscoll, M. (2005). Work-family conflict and stress. In A. G. Antoniou & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to organizational health psychology (pp. 346–365). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newsbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1237–1248. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00213.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damaske, S. (2011). For the family? How class and gender shape women’s work. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (1991). Gender differences in work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 60–74. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egan, M., Bambra, C., Thomas, S., Petticrew, M., Whitehead, M., & Thomson, H. (2007). The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 1. A systematic review of organisational-level interventions that aim to increase employee control. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(11), 945–954. doi:10.1136/jech.2006.054965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fenner, G. H., & Renn, R. W. (2010). Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management. Human Relations, 63(1), 63–82. doi:10.1177/0018726709351064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Barnes, G. M. (1996). Work–family conflict, gender, and health-related outcomes: A study of employed parents in two community samples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 57–69. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Frone, M. R., Yardley, J. K., & Markel, K. S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work–family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2), 145–167. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gareis, K. C., Barnett, R., Ertel, K. A., & Berkman, L. F. (2009). Work-family enrichment and conflict: Additive effects, buffering, or balance? Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 696–707. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00627.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. doi:10.2307/258214.Google Scholar
  16. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-f amily enrichment. The Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92. doi:10.2307/20159186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenhaus, J. H., Allen, T. D., & Spector, P. E. (2006). Health consequences of work-family conflict: The dark side of the work-family interface. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Employee health, coping and methodologies (pp. 61–98). US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press. doi:10.1016/S1479-3555(05)05002-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grzywacz, J. G. (2000). Work-family spillover and health during midlife: Is managing conflict everything? American Journal of Health Promotion, 14(4), 236–243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grzywacz, J. G., & Bass, B. L. (2003). Work, family, and mental health: testing different models of work-family fit. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 248–262. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00248.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grzywacz, J. G., & Butler, A. B. (2005). The impact of job characteristics on work-to-family facilitation: testing a theory and distinguishing a construct. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 97–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000a). Family, work, work-family spillover and problem drinking during midlife. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(2), 336–348. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00336.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000b). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: an ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Grzywacz, J. G., Butler, A. B., & Almeida, D. (2008). Work, family, and health: Work-family balance as a protective factor against the stresses of daily life. In A. Newhall-Marcus, D. F. Halpern, & S. J. Tan (Eds.), Changing realities of work and family. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Heaney, C. A., Price, R. H., & Rafferty, J. (1995). Increasing coping resources at work: A field experiment to increase social support, improve work team functioning, and enhance employee mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 335–353. doi:10.1002/job.4030160405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322–355. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kenny, D. (2015). SEM: Fit. Retrieved 11 Jan 2016, from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm.
  28. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 215–232. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Radler, B. T., & Ryff, C. D. (2010). Who participates? Accounting for longitudinal retention in the MIDUS national study of health and well-being. Journal of Aging and Health, 22(3), 307–331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Sancier, B. (1989). The mommy track. Affilia: Journal of Women & Social Work, 4(3), 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Selig, J. P., Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2008). Latent variable structural equation modeling in cross- cultural research: Multigroup and multilevel approaches. In F. R. van de Vijver, D. A. van Hemert, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 93–119). New York: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(3), 392–415. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1998.1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Voydanoff, P. (1988). Work role characteristics, family structure demands, and work/family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(3), 749–761. doi:10.2307/352644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Voydanoff, P. (2005). Consequences of boundary-spanning demands and resources for work-to-family conflict and perceived stress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(4), 491–503. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel R. Stoiko
    • 1
  • JoNell Strough
    • 1
  • Nicolas A. Turiano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWest Virgina UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations