Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 358–365 | Cite as

A Room with an Overview: the Effects of Schematic Processing, Mood and Exposure Duration on Memory Accuracy

  • Andrea Vranić
  • Mirjana Tonković
Article
  • 460 Downloads

Abstract

Studies often posit the processing dichotomy of positive vs. negative affect. People in a negative mood tend to process information in a more systematic manner while those in a positive mood tend to adopt a more heuristic, schema-directed processing style. A 3 (mood: negative vs. neutral vs. positive) × 2 (exposure duration: one vs. five minutes) × 2 (schema-consistent vs. schema-inconsistent items) experimental design was employed in a real-life setting and, using the incidental learning paradigm, to test recognition memory for objects in a typical office. Following the affect-as-information approach, we hypothesized that induced positive mood would lead participants to engage in a more schema-directed processing leading to less accurate memory, while induced negative mood will lead to a more analytic and detailed processing, leading to higher memory accuracy and fewer memory errors. Results revealed a significant effect of duration, indicating that participants made more schema-consistent errors when their stay in the office was shorter. The significant interaction of mood and exposure duration suggests that effect of the exposure on memory accuracy applies to people in negative and neutral mood, while people in positive mood tend to maintain schema-directed processing style for longer period of time.

Keywords

Memory accuracy Affect-as-information Schema-consistency Mood 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

Andrea Vranić declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mirjana Tonković declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alba, M. S. & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93, 203–231. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araya, T., Ekehammar, B., & Akrami, N. (2003). Remembering things that never occurred: the effects of to-be-forgotten stereotypical information. Experimental Psychology, 50, 27–32. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.50.1.27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bäuml, K. H. & Kuhbandner, C. (2007). Remembering can cause forgetting – but not In negative moods. Psychological Science, 18, 111–115. doi: 10.1111/j.14679280.2007.01857.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177, 77–80. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4043.77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bless, H. (2001). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In L. L. Martin (Ed.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 9–26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. doi: 10.1080/14792779443000102.Google Scholar
  6. Bodenhausen, G. V., Kramer, G. P., & Süsser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621–632. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brainerd, C. J. & Reyna, V. F. (2005). The science of false memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154054.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer, W. F. & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90008-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clore, G. L. & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 393–399. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an Instructional Design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6, 50–72. doi: 10.1002/piq.21143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiedler, K. (2001). Affective influences on social information processing. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), The handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 163–185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Fiedler, K., Asbeck, J., & Nickel, S. (1991). Mood and constructive memory effects on social judgment. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 363–378. doi: 10.1080/02699939108411048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forgas, J. P. & East, R. (2008). On being happy and gullible: mood effects on scepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1362–1367. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forgas, J. P., Laham, S. M., & Vargas, P. T. (2005). Mood effects on eyewitness memory: affective influences on susceptibility to misinformation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 574–588. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Isbell, L. M. (2004). Not all happy people are lazy or stupid: evidence ofsystematic processing in happy moods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 341–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lampinen, J. M., Copeland, S. M., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2001). Recollections of things schematic: room schemas revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1211–1222. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.5.1211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Loftus, G. R. & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565–572. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pastore, R. E., Crawley, E. W., Berens, M. S., & Skelly, M. (2003). Nonparametric A’ and other modern misconceptions about signal detection theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 556–569. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pezdek, K., Whetstone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., & Dougherty, T. (1989). Memory for real world scenes: the role of consistency with schema expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587–595. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.4.587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning. In R. E. Ripple & V. N. Rockcastle (Eds.), Piaget Rediscovered: A Report on the Conference of Cognitive Studies and Curriculum Development (pp. 7–20). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  21. Proust, M. (1913, 1981) Remembrance of things past. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  22. Roediger, H. L. & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reyna, V. F. (1992). Reasoning, remembering, and their relationship: social, cognitive, and developmental issues. In M. L. Howe, C. J. Brainerd, & V. F. Reyna (Eds.), Developmentof long-term retention (pp. 103–127). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2868-4_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reyna, V. F. (1995). Interference effects in memory and reasoning: A fuzzy-trace theory analysis. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 29–61). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc..Google Scholar
  26. Schacter, D. L. (1989). Memory. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 683–725). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (vol. 2, pp. 527–561). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Schwarz, N. & Skurnik, I. (2003). Feeling and thinking: implications for problem solving. In J. Davidson & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 263–292). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615771.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwarz, N., Bless, H. & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 161–199). doi: 10.1016/S00652601(08)60329-9
  30. Schwarz, N. & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shapiro, P. & Penrod, S. (1986). A meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139–156. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sinclair, R. C., Mark, M. M., & Clore, G. L. (1994). Mood-related persuasion depends on (mis)attributions. Social Cognition, 12, 309–329. doi: 10.1521/soco.1994.12.4.309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanislaw, H. & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149. doi: 10.3758/BF03207704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Storbeck, J. & Clore, G. L. (2005). With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16, 785–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01615.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Von Hippel, W. & Hawkins, C. (1994). Stimulus exposure time and perceptual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 525–535. doi: 10.3758/BF03206949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wyer, R. S., Clore, G.L., & Isbell, L. (1999). Affect and information processing. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–77). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60271-3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations