Current Psychology

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 354–360 | Cite as

Age Moderates the Mediational Role of Empathy in the Association Between Gender and Forgiveness

  • Rhonda Swickert
  • Sarah Robertson
  • Davis Baird


Researchers have suggested that empathy may serve to explain, at least in part, the relationship between gender and forgiveness. Some findings in the literature have supported this claim, while other studies have not. Accounting for the variable of age might help to explain these inconsistencies, as age has been found to influence the expression of empathy across gender. As such, in the present study we examined whether age might exert a conditional indirect effect on the relationship between gender and forgiveness as mediated by empathy. Participants were recruited from the community (N = 62) and on a college campus (N = 94). Within the community sample the average age was 74.8, while on the college campus the average age was 20.7. Participants were given a survey packet that included the Heartland Forgiveness Scale and the Empathy Quotient Scale, among other instruments. A moderated-mediational analysis showed that while gender was related to empathy and empathy was associated with forgiveness, empathy served as a significant mediator only for those younger than 62 years of age. This finding suggests that empathy serves as an important mediator in the relationship between gender and forgiveness for adults aged 61 and younger, because younger women are more likely to respond empathetically to a transgressor as compared to younger men. Older women also tend to be more forgiving than older men, but in the present study empathy was not as important of a factor in explaining this relationship for individuals 62 years and older. These findings help to address the inconsistencies in the literature with regard to the relationships among gender, age, empathy, and forgiveness.


Gender Forgiveness Empathy Mediation Moderation Conditional indirect effect 



The authors would like to thank the staff and residents of Bishop Gadsden for their assistance with this project, as well as Dr. James Hittner for his editorial comments.


  1. Allemand, M. (2008). Age differences in forgivingness: the role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1137–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonucci, T., & Akiyama, H. (1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 519–527.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartal, I., Decety, J., & Mason, P. (2011). Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Science, 334, 1427–1430.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, J., Worthington, E., Parrott, L., O’Connor, L., & Wade, N. (2001). Dispositional forgiveness: development and construct validity of the transgression narrative test of forgiveness (TNTF). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1277–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bono, G., McCullough, M., & Root, L. (2008). Forgiveness, feeling connected to others, and well-being: two longitudinal studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 182–195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter, C., Harris, J., & Porges, S. (2009). Neural and evolutionary perspectives on empathy. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 169–182). Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carstensen, L., & Fredrickson, B. (1998). Influence of HIV status and age on cognitive representations of others. Health Psychology, 17, 494–503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakrabarti, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Empathizing: neurocognitive developmental mechanisms and individual differences. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 403–417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. (2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews.Google Scholar
  10. Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Field, D. (1999). A cross-cultural persepective on countinuity and change in social relations in old age: introduction to a special issue. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 48, 257–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fincham, F., Paleari, F., & Regalia, C. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: the role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy. Personal Relationships, 9, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gurung, R., Taylor, S., & Seeman, T. (2003). Accounting for changes in social support among married older adults: insights from the MacArthur studies of successful again. Psychology and Aging, 18, 487–496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayes, A., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Huupponen, R., Huhtaniemi, I., & Lehtonen, A. (2009). Testosterone: clinical relevance in ageing men. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 19, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ickes, W., Gesn, P., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, P., & Fay, L. (1950).  The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application.  Psychometrika, 15, 349–367.Google Scholar
  18. Knickmeyer, R., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Fetal testosterone and empathy. Hormones and Behavior, 49(3), 282–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawrence, E., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. (2004). Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34, 911–919.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Löckenhoff, C., & Carstensen, L. (2004). Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: the increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. Journal of Personality, 72, 1395–4124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Macaskill, A., Maltby, J., & Day, L. (2002). Forgiveness of self and others and emotional empathy. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 663–665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Malcolm, W., Warwar, S., & Greenberg, L. (2005). Facilitating forgiveness in individual therapy as an approach to resolving interpersonal injuries. In E. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 379–392). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. McCullough, M., Worthington, E., & Rachal, K. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, A., Worthington, E., & McDaniel, M. (2008). Gender and forgiveness: a meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 843–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muncer, S., & Ling, J. (2006). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient scale (EQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1111–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neff, L., & Karney, B. (2005). Gender differences in social support: a question of skill or responsiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 79–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Preacher, K., Rucker, D., & Hayes, A. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rye, M., Pargament, K., Ali, M., Beck, G., Dorff, E., Hallisey, C., et al. (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In M. McCullough, K. Paragament, & C. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 17–40). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Schieman, S., & Van Gundy, K. (2000). The personal and social links between age and self-reported empathy. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 152–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson, L., Snyder, C., Hoffman, L., Michael, S., Billings, H., Rasmussen, L., et al. (2005). Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73, 313–359.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 673–685.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Toussaint, L., Williams, D., Musick, M., & Everson, S. (2001). Forgiveness and health: age differences in a U.S. probability sample. Journal of Adult Development, 8, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Honk, J., Shutter, D., Bos, P., Druijt, A., Lentjes, E., & Baraon-Cohen, S. (2011). Testosterone administration impairs cognitive empathy in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(8), 3448–3452.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Whited, M., Wheat, A., & Larkin, K. (2010). The influence of forgiveness and apology on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery in response to mental stress. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 293–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Worthington, E. (2003). Forgiving and reconciling: Bridges to wholeness and hope. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
  36. Worthington, E. (2005). Handbook of forgiveness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Worthington, E., & Wade, N. (1999). The social psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations