Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 644–653 | Cite as

Everyday Activities: Beneficial Effects of Eudaimonic and Hedonic Motivation on Subjective Well-Being

  • Marko Tončić
  • Petra Anić
Article
  • 694 Downloads

Abstract

The study focuses on the impact of time and motives for everyday activities on mood and daily satisfaction. One hundred twenty-one undergraduate students participated in study using experience sampling method. The short PANAS scale, one item momentary satisfaction measure and state orientation to happiness scale were used. The measures were administered five times a day for 7 days via hand-held devices. The data were modeled using a linear mixed-effects approach. The models fitted the data reasonably well, especially for satisfaction and positive affect (PA) sharing similar parameter estimates. Both showed a nonlinear increase through the week while PA showed a similarly shaped circa-diurnal rhythm too. Negative affect (NA) showed almost no rhythm at all. Both hedonic and eudaimonic motives increased satisfaction and PA. Hedonic motives had a negative impact on NA. Generally, on momentary level, hedonic motives have a greater impact while longer intervals seem to emphasize the importance of eudaimonic motives.

Keywords

Hedonic enjoyment Eudaimonia Positive affect Negative affect Satisfaction Everyday activities Experience-sampling Linear mixed-effects model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports under Grant 009-0342618-2193 and by the University of Rijeka under Grant 13.04.1.3.05.

References

  1. Baayen, H. R., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28.Google Scholar
  2. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, L. F., & Barrett, D. J. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19(2), 175–185. doi: 10.1177/089443930101900204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Retrieved from http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/.
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2002). The pursuit of meaningfulness in life. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 608–618). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Compton, W. C., Smith, M. L., Cornish, K. A., & Qualls, D. L. (1996). Factor structure of mental health measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 406–413. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawley, M. J. (2007). The R book (p. 877). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (p. 336). New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention (p. 464). New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: the uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 185–199. doi: 10.1023/A:1024409732742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2010). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures. In A. Delle Fave, F. Massimini, & M. Bassi (Eds.), Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Social empowerment through personal growth (Vol. 2, pp. 3–18). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9876-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157. doi: 10.1007/BF01207052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E. (2009). The Science of Well-Being. (E. Diener, Ed.) (Vol. 37, pp. 11–58). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6.
  18. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science (New York, N.Y.), 333(6051), 1878–1881. doi: 10.1126/science.1202775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henderson, L. W., Knight, T., & Richardson, B. (2013). The hedonic and eudaimonic validity of the orientations to happiness scale. Social Indicators Research, 115(3), 1087–1099. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0264-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huta, V. (2005). Pursuing pleasure versus growth and excellence : Links with different aspects of well-being. Montreal: McGill University. Retrieved from http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=85919&silo_library=GEN01.Google Scholar
  23. Huta, V. (2011). Linking peoples’ pursuit of eudaimonia and hedonia with characteristics of their parents: parenting styles, verbally endorsed values, and role modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 47–61. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9249-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huta, V. (2013). Eudaimonia. In S. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 201–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology (p. 608). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Kardum, I. (1998). Affect intensity and frequency: their relation to mean level and variability of positive and negative affect and Eysencks personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 33–47. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00157-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: the costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233. doi: 10.1080/17439760802303044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kraut, R. (1979). Two conceptions of happines. Philosophical Review, 88(2), 167–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larsen, R. J. (2009). The contribution of positive and negative affect to emotional well-being. Psychological Topics, 18, 247–266.Google Scholar
  32. Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. In H. Reis (Ed.), New directions for naturalistic methods in the behavioral sciences (pp. 41–56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: the architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: on doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 494–512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norton, D. L. (1976). Personal destinies: A philosophy of ethical individualism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 157–184. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: the full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25–41. doi: 10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS (p. 528). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. R Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/.
  40. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11392867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schimmack, U. (2002). Methodological issues in the assessment of the affective component of subjective well-being. In A. Ohn & M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 96–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: the use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 345–384. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.05008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 395–406. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schueller, S. M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Pursuit of pleasure, engagement, and meaning: relationships to subjective and objective measures of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 253–263. doi: 10.1080/17439761003794130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Seligman, M. E. P., Parks, A. C., & Steen, T. (2004). A balanced psychology and a full life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1379–1381. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1513.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 22–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vittersø, J. (2003). Flow versus life satisfaction: a projective use of cartoons to illustrate the difference between the evaluation approach and the intrinsic motivation approach to subjective quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(2), 141–167. doi: 10.1023/A:1024413112234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vittersø, J. (2004). Subjective well-being versus self-actualization: using the flow-simplex to promote a conceptual clarification of subjective quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 65(3), 299–331. doi: 10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003910.26194.ef.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vittersø, J., Oelmann, H. I., & Wang, A. L. (2009a). Life satisfaction is not a balanced estimator of the good life: evidence from reaction time measures and self-reported emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10902-007-9058-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vittersø, J., & Søholt, Y. (2011). Life satisfaction goes with pleasure and personal growth goes with interest: further arguments for separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(4), 326–335. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2011.584548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vittersø, J., Søholt, Y., Hetland, A., Thoresen, I. A., & Røysamb, E. (2009b). Was Hercules happy? Some answers from a functional model of human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9447-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.4.678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Waterman, A. S. (2007). On the importance of distinguishing hedonia and eudaimonia when contemplating the hedonic treadmill. The American Psychologist, 62(6), 612–613. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X62.6.612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: a eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 234–252. doi: 10.1080/17439760802303002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (Hedonic Enjoyment and Eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 41–79. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9020-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zelenski, J. M., & Larsen, R. J. (2000). The distribution of basic emotions in everyday life: a state and trait perspective from experience sampling data. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(2), 178–197. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1999.2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesUniversity of RijekaRijekaCroatia

Personalised recommendations