Current Psychology

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 71–81 | Cite as

Emotion and the Ultimate Attribution Error



The influence of specific emotions (fear and anger) on the ultimate attribution error was investigated. Participants were recruited from an undergraduate population. There were 420 participants (156 male) with a mean age of 19.26 years. Participants took part in an online study. The study identified participants’ political in-groups (Democrat or Republican), induced them to feel an emotion (fear, anger, or neutral), and asked them to make an attribution (dispositional or circumstantial control) for the good or bad behaviors of Democratic or Republican politicians. Results revealed an ultimate attribution error (participants made in-group favoring/out-group derogating attributions), and an influence of emotion over the pattern of attributions made within this attribution error. The hypothesis that the valence of emotions influences attributions within the ultimate attribution error was supported. No support was found for the hypothesis that appraisal dimensions of emotions influence attributions within the ultimate attribution error. Theoretical implications and future directions were discussed.


Attribution Judgment Emotion 


  1. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumgardner, A. H., & Arkin, R. M. (1988). Affective state mediates causal attributions for success and failure. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coleman, M. D. (2011). Emotion and the self-serving bias. Current Psychology, 30, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Congressional Record (2011).
  6. Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 590–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forgas, J. P. (1998). On being happy and mistaken: mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 318–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forgas, J. P., & Locke, J. (2005). Affective influences on causal inferences: the effects of mood on attributions for positive and negative interpersonal episodes. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1071–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hewstone, M. (1990). The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on the intergroup causal atrributuion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hewstone, M., & Ward, C. (1985). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in Southeast Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 614–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2011). Emotions as moral amplifiers: an appraisal tendency approach to the influences of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  16. Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740–752.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khan, S. S., & Liu, H. (2008). Intergroup attributions and ethnocentrism in the Indian subcontinent: the ultimate attribution error revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lerner, J. S., Han, S., & Keltner, D. (2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: extending the appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 184–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Lowenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levenson, R. (1994). Human emotion: A functional view. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion (pp. 123–126). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1996). The communicative theory of emotions: Empirical tests, mental models, and implications for social interaction. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenberg, S. W., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1977). International conflict and the problem of attribution. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 75–103.Google Scholar
  26. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 10 (pp. 173–220). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Ross, L., Greene, D., & Huse, P. (1977). The ‘false consensus effect’: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in Emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations