Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 381–385 | Cite as

Money Doesn’t Stink. Or Does It? The Effect of Immorally Acquiring Money on Its Spending

  • Peter Kardos
  • Emanuele Castano
Article

Abstract

Building on magical contagion literature, we show that the way in which money is acquired colors the perception of the money itself, and thus affect the way it is spent. In a hypothetical scenario participants who imagined acquiring money immorally (versus morally) experienced more guilt about the way in which they acquired it and spent less of it. Furthermore, in the immoral, but not the moral condition, guilt correlated significantly with spending: the greater the guilt, the less money was spent. We interpret this finding as stemming from individuals’ desire not to handle what they see as “dirty” money.

Keywords

Money Morality Magical contagion Spending Guilt 

References

  1. Camerer, C. F. (1995). Individual decision making. In J. Kagel & A. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 587–703). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cryder, C. E., Lerner, J. S., Gross, J. J., & Dahl, R. E. (2008). Misery is not miserly: sad and self-focused individuals spend more. Psychological Science, 19, 525–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dio Cassius. (1925). Roman History, Volume VIII, Books 61–70. Translated by Ernest Cary. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Elliott, C. M., & Radomsky, A. S. (2009). Analyses of mental contamination: Part I, experimental manipulations of morality. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 995–1003.Google Scholar
  5. Hejmadi, A., Rozin, P., & Siegal, M. (2004). Once in contact, always in contact: contagious essence and conceptions of purification in American and Hindu Indian children. Developmental Psychology, 40, 467–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levav, J., & McGraw, A. P. (2009). Emotional accounting: how feelings about money influence consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: transmission of germs and interpersonal influence. Ethos: The Journal of Psychological Anthropology, 22, 158–186.Google Scholar
  9. Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (2000). The makings of the magical mind. In K. S. Rosengren, C. N. Johnson, & P. L. Harris (Eds.), Imagining the impossible: Magical, scientific, and religious thinking in children (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rozin, P., Millman, L., & Nemeroff, C. (1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rozin, P., Grant, H., Weinberg, S., & Parker, S. (2007). ‘Head versus heart’: effect of monetary frames on expression of sympathetic magical concerns. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 217–224.Google Scholar
  12. Savani, K., Kumar, S., Naidu, N. V. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Beliefs about emotional residue: the idea that emotions leave a trace in the physical environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 684–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. White, P. A. (2009). Property transmission: an explanatory account of the role of similarity information in causal inference. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 774–793.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNew School for Social ResearchNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations