Charitable Intent: A Moral or Social Construct? A Revised Theory of Planned Behavior Model
- First Online:
Given an increasing global need to elicit and stimulate charitable giving and in light of the limited social-psychological research on this subject, this study contributes to a better empirical understanding of the factors that underlie charitable giving (intentions). In contrast to previous research, it was hypothesized that moral norms rather than social norms are likely to play a significant role in the formation of charitable intentions. An extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) model was constructed in order to test the influence of six social-psychological variables on an individual’s intention to donate to charity. Respondents (N = 143) completed an online questionnaire about charitable behaviour that assessed the constructs of the revised model. The present study found support for the stated hypothesis: while social norms (both descriptive and prescriptive) did not explain any of the variance in intention, moral norms accounted for a significant amount of the overall variance and were in fact identified as the strongest (relative) predictor of charitable giving intentions. In addition to moral norms, ‘attitude’, ‘perceived behavioral control’ and ‘past behaviour’ were also identified as significant predictors. The findings in this study support a revised TPB model that accounts for nearly 70% of the explained variance in charitable intent. Implications for both theory and practice are discussed.
KeywordsCharitable giving Moral norms Pro-social behavior Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
- Ajzen, I. (2006). Theory of planned behavior. Constructing A TPB Questionnaire. Retrieved on December 21st, 2010 from: http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.
- Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (2005). The handbook of attitudes. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Borgloh, S., Dannenberg, A., and Aretz, B. (2010). Small is beautiful: Experimental evidence of donor’s preferences for charities. ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 10–052.Google Scholar
- Brooks, A. C. (2003). Religious faith and charitable giving. Policy Review, 121. Retrieved on November 19th, 2011 from: http://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/6577.
- Canadian Centre for Philanthropy (2004). Understanding Canadian donors: Using the national survey of giving, volunteering and participating to build your fundraising program. Retrieved on December 19th, 2010, from: www.givingandvolunteering.ca/pdf/reports/Understanding_Donors.pdf.
- Charities Aid Foundation (2010). The world giving index. Retrieved on August 21nd, 2011, from: https://www.cafonline.org/pdf/WorldGivingIndex28092010Print.pdf.
- Drollinger, T. L. (1998). A multidisciplinary model of monetary donations to charitable organisations. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 59, 0458.Google Scholar
- Farrell, A. M. and Rudd, J. M. (2009). Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues. Working Paper: Australia-New Zeeland Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC). Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 339–369). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Krebs, D., and Janicki, M. (2002). Biological foundations of moral norms. In M. Schaller and C. Crandall (Eds.), Psychological Foundations of Culture.Google Scholar
- Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). The role of moral norm in the attitude–behavior relation. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitude, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 11–30). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Miller, K. (2005). Communications theories; perspectives, processes, and contexts. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 22, 218–233.Google Scholar
- Rosen, H. S., and Sims, S. T. (2010). Altruistic behavior and habit formation. Princeton’s Center for Economic Policy Studies. Working Paper No. 210.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 10 (pp. 222–280). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 1–30). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, N., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97.Google Scholar
- Warburton, J., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Volunteer decision making by older people: A test of a revised theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 245–257.Google Scholar