The influence of specific emotions (guilt and revulsion) on the self-serving bias was investigated. Participants were recruited from an undergraduate population. There were 360 participants (132 male) with a mean age of 19.41 years. Participants took part in an online study, which involved taking a ten-question test, completing an emotional induction, receiving test feedback, and making an attribution for test performance. Results revealed a significant effect of feedback (p < 0.001) indicating the self-serving bias. Results also revealed a significant effect of emotion over this self-serving bias. Both guilty and revolted participants made less self-enhancing attributions for success (p = 0.04), and less self-protecting attributions for failure (p = 0.006). The hypothesis that the valence of specific emotions influences the self-serving bias was supported. No support was found for the hypothesis that the appraisal dimensions of specific emotions influence the self-serving bias. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
KeywordsSelf-serving bias Judgment Emotion Attribution
- Brockner, J. (1983). Low self-esteem and behavioral plasticity: Some implications. In L. Wheeler & P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 237–271). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Imai, Y. (1994). Effects of influencing attempts on the perceptions of powerholders and the powerless. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 445–468.Google Scholar
- Levenson, R. (1994). Human emotion: A functional view. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion (pp. 123–126). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1996). The communicative theory of emotions: Empirical tests, mental models, and implications for social interaction. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Sedikides, C. (1992). Changes in the valence of the self as a function of mood. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 271–311.Google Scholar