Advertisement

Current Psychology

, 30:184 | Cite as

Ageism, Sensation-Seeking, and Risk-Taking Behavior in Young Adults

  • Lauren E. Popham
  • Shelia M. Kennison
  • Kristopher I. Bradley
Article

Abstract

The research investigated the relationships among ageism, sensation-seeking, and risk-taking in young adults. Recent research has shown that young adults reporting higher levels of ageist attitudes and ageist behaviors also report higher levels of risk-taking in daily life than those with less ageist attitudes and behaviors (Popham et al. in press). The results are consistent with terror management theory; young adults may attempt to buffer their death anxiety by seeking out experiences that make them feel strong and invulnerable (i.e., taking risks). In contrast, prior research has shown that there is a link between risk-taking and sensation-seeking and that individuals may be biologically predisposed to be high sensation-seekers (Zuckerman Behavioural and Brain Sciences 7:413–471, 1984; Neuropsychobiology 13:121–128, 1985). In a study with 475 undergraduates, we investigated the relationships among ageism, sensation-seeing, and risk-taking behavior. The results showed that ageist behavior and two dimensions of sensation-seeking (i.e., Disinhibition and Experience Seeking) were significant predictors of risk-taking. Implications for practical approaches to reduce risk-taking in young adults are discussed.

Keywords

Ageism Risk-taking Sensation-seeking Terror management theory Young adults 

References

  1. Allan, L., & Johnson, J. (2009). Undergraduate attitudes toward the elderly: the role of knowledge, contact and aging anxiety. Educational Gerontology, 35, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, G., & Brown, R. I. (1984). Real and laboratory gambling, sensation seeking and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 401–410. Retrieved from http://www.bpsjournals.co.uk/journals/bjp/.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, R. D., Foote, W. E., & Throckmorton, B. (2000). Human sexual behavior: A comparison of college and Internet surveys. In M. Birnbaum’s (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 141–168). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brener, N. D., Kann, L., McManus, T., Kinchen, S. A., Sunderberg, E. C., & Ross, J. G. (2002). Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(4), 336–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CDC. (2008). Morbidity and mortality weekly report. CDC Surveillance Summaries/Centers For Disease Control, 57, 1–131. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/.Google Scholar
  7. Cherry, K. E., & Palmore, E. (2008). Relating to older people evaluation (ROPE): a measure of self-reported ageism. Educational Gerontology, 34, 849–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, H., & LaRose, R. (1999). Privacy issues in internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17, 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cronk, B. C., & West, J. L. (2002). Personality research on the internet: A comparison of web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(2), 177–180. Retrieved from http://brm.psychonomic-journals.org/content/34/2/177.full.pdf+html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daitzman, R. J., Zuckerman, M., Sammelwitz, P., & Ganjam, V. (1978). Sensation-seeking and gonadal hormones. Journal of Biological Sciences, 10, 401–408.Google Scholar
  11. DiClemente, R. J., Santelli, J. S., & Crosby, R. A. (2009). Adolescent health: Understanding and preventing risk behaviors. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Eaton, D. K., Laura Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Shanklin, S., Ross, J., Hawkins, J., et al. (2010). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2009. MMWR Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report, 59, 1–148. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5905a1.htm.Google Scholar
  13. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Fraboni, M., Saltstone, R., & Hughes, S. (1990). The Fraboni scale of ageism (FSA): an attempt at a more precise measure of ageism. Canadian Journal on Aging, 9, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerra, G., Avanzini, P., Zaimovic, A., Sartori, R., Bocchi, C., Timpano, M., et al. (1999). Neurotransmitters, neuroendocrine correlates of sensation-seeking temperament in normal humans. Neuropsychobiology, 39, 207–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goma, M., Perez, J., & Torrubia, R. (1988). Personality variables in antisocial and prosocial disinhibitory behavior. In T. E. Moffitt & S. A. Mednick’s (Eds.), Biological contributions to crime causation (pp. 211–222). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  17. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Greenberg, J., Schimel, J., & Martens, A. (2002). Ageism: Denying the face of the future. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older people (pp. 3–26). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Horvath, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 41–52. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90173-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joinson, A. N. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavioral Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 31, 433–438. Retrieved from http://www.psychonomic.org/backissues/1701/B360.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolbe, L. J., Kann, L., & Collins, J. L. (1993). Overview of the youth risk behavior surveillance system. Public Health Reports, 108(suppl. 1), 2–10. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1403301/pdf/pubhealthrep00063-0004.pdf.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Krantz, J. H., & Dalal, R. (2000). Validity of web-based psychological research. In M. Birnbaum’s (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 35–60). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leather, N. (2009). Risk-taking behaviour in adolescence: a literature review. Journal of Child Health Care, 13, 295–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martens, A., Greenberg, J., Schimel, J., & Landau, M. J. (2004). Ageism and death: effects of mortality salience and perceived similarity to elders on reactions to elderly people. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1524–1536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martens, A., Goldenberg, J. L., & Greenberg, J. (2005). A terror management perspective on ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Netter, P., Hennig, J., & Roed, I. S. (1996). Serotonin and dopamine as mediators of sensation seeking behavior. Neuropsychobiology, 34, 155–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Popham, L. E., Kennison, S. M., & Bradley, K. I. (in press). Ageism and risk-taking in young adults: Evidence for a link between death anxiety and ageism. Death Studies.Google Scholar
  28. Roberti, J. W. (2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 256–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  30. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 91–159). Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492–1512. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zaleski, Z. (1984). Sensation seeking and risk taking behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 607–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zuckerman, M. (1983a). Sensation seeking and sports. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 285–292. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(83)90150-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zuckerman, M. (1983b). Sensation seeking: The initial motive for drug abuse. In E. Gotheil, K. A. Druley, T. E. Skoloda, & H. M. Waxman (Eds.), Etiological aspects of alcohol and drug abuse (pp. 202–220). Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
  35. Zuckerman, M. (1984). Sensation seeking: a comparative approach to a human trait. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 7, 413–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zuckerman, M. (1985). Sensation seeking, mania, and monoamines. Neuropsychobiology, 13, 121–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zuckerman, M. (1987). Is sensation seeking a predisposing trait for alcoholism? In E. Gottheil, K. A. Druley, S. Pashkey, & S. P. Weinstein (Eds.), Stress and addiction (pp. 283–301). New York: Bruner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  38. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioural expressions and biosocial bases of sensation-seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Zuckerman, M., Kolin, E. A., Price, L., & Zoob, I. (1964). Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zuckerman, M., Tushup, R., & Finner, S. (1976). Sexual attitudes and experience: attitude and personality correlations and changes produced by a course in sexuality. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 7–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zuckerman, M., Ball, S., & Black, J. (1990). Influences of sensation seeking, gender, risk appraisal, and situational motivation on smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 15, 209–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren E. Popham
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shelia M. Kennison
    • 1
  • Kristopher I. Bradley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations