Current Psychology

, 28:225 | Cite as

The Validity of a New, Self-report Measure of Multiple Intelligence



In all, 187 participants completed a new, self-report measure of eight multiple intelligences (Haselbauer 2005), a General Knowledge test (Irwing et al. Personality and Individual Differences 30:857–871, 2001), a measure of Approaches to Learning Styles (Biggs 1987), a measure of the Big Five personality traits (Costa and McCrae 1992), as well as gave their own estimated scores on the Gardner (1999) multiple intelligences. Alpha co-efficients were modest with only three of the eight test-derived, multiple intelligence scores being over .70. ‘Linguistic’ and Mathematical intelligence alone were correlated with General Knowledge. Five of the eight ‘intelligences’ were correlated both with Extraversion and Openness. Regressions indicated that ‘Intrapersonal intelligence’ was closely linked with Stability and Conscientiousness; ‘Interpersonal intelligence’ with Extraversion; ‘Linguistic intelligence’ with Openness; ‘Mathematical intelligence’ with Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Correlations between self-estimated and test-derived emotional intelligence showed correlations ranging from r = .18 to r = .56 for similar type ‘intelligences’. This study provides modest evidence for the concurrent and construct validity of this measure. It requires more psychometric evidence of validity before it is used.


Multiple intelligences Self-report Validity 


  1. Biggs, J. (1987). Study process questionnaire manual. Hawthorne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  2. Brody, N. (2004). What cognitive intelligence is and what emotional intelligence is not. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 234–238.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Moutafi, J. (2004). The relationship between estimated and psychometric personality and intelligence scores. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Ackerman, P. (2006). Ability and personality correlates of general knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, J.-Q. (2004). Theory of multiple intelligences: is it a scientific theory. Teachers’ College Record, 106, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa: PAR.Google Scholar
  8. Cuban, L. (2004). Assessing the 20-year impact of multiple intelligences on schooling. Teachers’ College Record, 106, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisner, E. (2004). Multiple intelligences: its tensions and possibilities. Teachers’ College Record, 106, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furnham, A. (2001). Self-estimates of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1381–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furnham, A. (2004). Are lay people lumpers or splitters? Learning and Individual Difference, 14, 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furnham, A. (2005). Gender and personality differences in self and other ratings of business intelligence. British Journal of Management, 16, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furnham, A. (2008). Personality and intelligence at work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Estimating one’s own personality and intelligence scores. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Personality, intelligence and general knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Furnham, A., & Petrides, K. (2006). Parental estimate of five types of intelligence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Furnham, A., Christopher, A., Garwood, J., & Martin, A. (2007). Approaches to learning and the acquisition of general knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1563–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Gardner, H. (2006a). On failing to grasp the core of MI theory. Intelligence, 34, 503–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gardner, H. (2006b). Responses to critiques of multiple intelligence theory. In J. Schaler (Ed.), Gardner under fire. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  22. Gottfredson, L. (2003a). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31, 343–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gottfredson, L. (2003b). On Sternberg’s “Reply to Gottfredson”. Intelligence, 31, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haselbauer, N. (2005). What’s your IQ?. New York: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar
  25. Irwing, R., Cammock, T., & Lynn, R. (2001). Some evidence for the existence of a general factor of semantic memory and its components. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 857–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kallenbach, S., & Viens, J. (2004). Open to interpretation: multiple intelligences theory in adult literacy education. Teachers’ College Record, 106, 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klein, P. (1997). Multiplying the problems of intelligence by eight: a critique of Gardner’s Theory. Canadian Journal of Education, 22, 377–394.Google Scholar
  28. Morgan, H. (1996). An analysis of Gardner’s Theory of multiple intelligence. Roeper Review, 18, 263–269.Google Scholar
  29. Perez, J., Petrides, K., & Furnham, A. (2004). Measuring trait emotional intelligence. In R. Schultz & R. Roberts (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: An international handbook (pp. 181–201). Gottingen: Hogrefe and Huber.Google Scholar
  30. Petrides, K., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2006). On the dimensional structure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 311–320.Google Scholar
  32. Shearer, B. (2004). Multiple intelligences theory after 20 years. Teachers’ College Record, 106, 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sternberg, R., Forsythe, G., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J., Wagner, R., Williams, W., et al. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Visser, B., Ashton, M., & Vernon, P. (2006a). Beyond g: putting multiple intelligences theory to the test. Intelligence, 34, 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Visser, B., Ashton, M., & Vernon, P. (2006b). g and the measurement of multiple intelligences: a response to Gardner. Intelligence, 34, 507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson, G. (2002). The psychology of performing artists. London: Whurr.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations