Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 55–68 | Cite as

The Effects of Social Identity and Perceived Autonomy Support on Health Behaviour Within the Theory of Planned Behaviour

  • Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
  • Martin S. Hagger
  • C. K. John Wang
  • Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani
Article

Abstract

The present study employed constructs from self-determination theory, social-identity theory, and the theory of planned behaviour to examine the combined effects that social identity and perceived autonomy support exerted on attitudes, intentions and health behaviour. A prospective design was employed measuring constructs from the theory of planned behaviour, group norms, group identification, and perceived autonomy support at baseline and physical activity behaviour 5 weeks later. Self-report questionnaires were administered to 231 pupils (male = 113, female = 118, M = 14.21 years, SD = .90). Hierarchical regression analysis demonstrated that group norms predicted participation in physical activities and attitudes, but only for participants who identified strongly with their group. Perceived autonomy support predicted attitudes, intentions and behaviour. The effects of perceived autonomy support and social-identity constructs were independent. It was concluded that both social identity and perceived autonomy support should be included in the theory of planned behaviour.

Keywords

Self-determination theory Social-identity theory Theory of planned behaviour Leisure-time physical activity 

References

  1. Aiken, L., & West, S. (1992). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Hagger, M. (2005). Effects of a brief intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on leisure-time physical activity participation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Google Scholar
  7. Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hagger, M., & Smith, B. (2007). Influences of perceived autonomy support on physical activity within the theory of planned behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 934–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christian, J., & Abrams, D. (2003). The effects of social identification, norms and attitudes on use of outreach services by homeless people. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. (1994). Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deci, E. L., La Guardia, J. G., Moller, A. C., Scheiner, M. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). On the benefits of giving as well as receiving autonomy support: Mutuality in close friendships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 313–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). “Cognitive consequences of forced compliance”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Godin, G., & Shephard, R. J. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science, 10, 141–146.Google Scholar
  14. Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. (2005). The social psychology of exercise and sport. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2006). Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: between-and within-participants analyses. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 731–757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hagger, M., Chatzisarantis, N., & Biddle, S. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior: predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 3–32.Google Scholar
  17. Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Culverhouse, T., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2003). The process by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: a trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 784–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hein, V., Pihu, M., Soós, I., & Karsai, I. (2007). The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and cross-cultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 632–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobs, D. R., Ainsworth, B. E., Hartman, T. J., & Leon, A. S. (1993). A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, 25, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnston, K. L., & White, K. M. (2003). Binge-drinking: a test of the role of group norms in the theory of planned behaviour. Psychology & Health, 18, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Rentzelas, P., & Hagger, M. (2007). The role of group norms upon the levels of intrinsic motivation: a SDT perspective. Proceedings of the Self Determination Theory, 3rd International Conference, 45–46.Google Scholar
  23. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stice, E., Shaw, H., & Marti, C. N. (2007). A meta-analytic review of eating disorder prevention programs: encouraging findings. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  26. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations pp. 33–47. Monterey: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
  27. Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: a role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self concept: A social cognitive theory pf group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: theory and research (vol 2 (pp. 77–122). Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar
  30. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams, G. C., Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21, 40–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martin S. Hagger
    • 3
  • C. K. John Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani
    • 4
  1. 1.National Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Motivation in Education Research LaboratorySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.School of PsychologyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  4. 4.School of Sport and Exercise ScienceUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations