Current Psychology

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 173–181 | Cite as

Rhetoric and psychiatry: A Szaszian perspective on a political case study

  • Richard E. VatzEmail author


The study of rhetoric and the assumption that rhetors generate the grounding for persuasion have been at the root of Thomas Szasz’s psychiatric critiques for almost two generations. His corpus has consistently pointed to a psychiatric rhetoric which creates, rather than discovers, “mental illnesses,” a metaphorical pseudo-medical labeling which, when accepted, confounds the attribution of adult responsibility and substitutes instead an infantilizing dependency.


Mental Illness Brain Disease Current Psychology National Comorbidity Survey Replication Post Editorial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychiatric Association (2004). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders fourth edition. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Bitzer, L.F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, L. (1932). The Rhetoric of Aristotle. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. “Exit Mr. Duncan: Clinical depression sidelines a promising career.” (2006, June 23) p. A24.Google Scholar
  4. Fritze, J. (2006, June 23). Duncan bows out: Candidate’s depression diagnosis reshapes race for governor. The Baltimore Sun, pp. 1, 15.Google Scholar
  5. Jamison, K.R. (2006, June 25). Acknowledging depression: Public figures perform a service in revealing mental illness. The Washington Post, p. B7.Google Scholar
  6. Kessler, R., Coccaro., E.F., Fava, M., & Jaeger, S. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV intermittent explosive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 669–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kotulak, R. (2006, June 6). Anger attacks common and research tells why: Intermittent explosive disorder affects 1 in 20. Chicago Tribune, p. 7.Google Scholar
  8. Moe, R. (2006, July 9). What my son couldn’t tell us: Mental illness and suicide must not be taboo topics. The Washington Post, p. B07.Google Scholar
  9. Mosk, M., & Marimow, A. E. (2006, June 23). Duncan drops bid for governor: Exit pits Ehrlich against O’Malley in new Md. Terrain. The Washington Post, p. 01.Google Scholar
  10. Orwell, G. (2003[1945]). Animal Farm. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  11. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.Google Scholar
  12. Szasz, T.S. (1961). The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Hoeber-Harper.Google Scholar
  13. Szasz, T.S. (1978). The myth of psychotherapy: mental healing as religion, rhetoric and repression. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  14. Szasz, T.S. (1987). Insanity: The idea and its consequences. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Szasz, T. (1999). Fatal freedom: The ethics and politics of suicide (Westport: Praeger, 1999).Google Scholar
  16. Vatz, R.E. (1973). The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6, 154–61.Google Scholar
  17. Vatz, R.E. (1975). Letter to the editor. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 8, 68.Google Scholar
  18. Vatz, R.E. (1981). The Forum: Vatz on Patton and Bitzer. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 67, 95–99.Google Scholar
  19. Vatz, R.E. (2006, June 28). Dealing with depression. The Washington Post, p. A24.Google Scholar
  20. Vatz, R.E. and Weinberg, L.S. (1994). The rhetorical paradigm in psychiatric history. Thomas Szasz and the myth of mental illness. In M.S. Micale & R. Porter (Eds.) discovering the history of psychiatry (pp. 311–330), New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Towson UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations