Current Psychology

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 102–112 | Cite as

Cognition at risk: Gestalt/feature-intensive processing and cigarette smoking in college students

  • Matthew J. Sharps
  • Amy Boothby Villegas
  • Justin Matthews


Although previous research has shown the importance of feature-intensive processing of relevant information in the staving off of addictive behaviors, the present study examined the possibility that a more global, gestalt rejection of cigarette smoking may be operating to reduce smoking behavior. The present study addressed this possibility through the use of a decision efficacy rating procedure, in which smoking and nonsmoking respondents were asked to determine whether an individual was justified in smoking in a variety of given situations. Nonsmokers tended to reject smoking under any circumstances, whereas smokers tended to entertain mitigating circumstances more favorably in justifying smoking, especially when smoking could be construed as providing some perceived positive gains in serious situations. Results are discussed in terms of the gestalt/feature-intensive processing theory of cognition, and in terms of the importance of cognitive approaches to the understanding of addictive behaviors.


Cigarette Smoking Smoking Behavior Tobacco Control Addictive Behavior Current Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, C., & Burns, D.M. (2000). Patterns of adolescent smoking initiation rates by ethnicity and sex. Tobacco Control, 9 (Suppl II), ii4-ii8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amett, J.J. (2000). Optimistic bias in adolescent and adult smokers and nonsmokers. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balch, G.I. (2000). Communicating with teens: Some lessons from commercial marketing.Tobacco Control, 9 (Suppl I), i52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlson, E.B., & Putnam, F.W. (1993). An update on the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Dissociation: Progress in the Dissociative Disorders, 6, 16–27.Google Scholar
  5. Cowen, R. (1999). Math error equals loss of Mars orbiter. Science News, 156, 229.Google Scholar
  6. DeBernardo, R.L., Aldinger, C.E., Dawood, O.R., Hanson, R.E., Lee, S.J., & Rinaldi, R.N. (1999). An email assessment of undergraduates’ attitudes toward smoking. Journal of American College Health, 48, 61–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Domer, D. (1996). The logic of failure: Why things go wrong and what we can do to make them right. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  8. Emmons, K.M., Wechsler, H., Dowdall, G., & Abraham, M. (1998). Predictors of smoking among U.S. college students. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 104–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epstein, J.A., Griffin, K.W., & Botvin, G.J. (2000). Competence skills help deter smoking among inner city adolescents. Tobacco Control, 9, 33–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Everett, S.A., Husten, C.G., Kann, L., Warren, C.W., Sharp, D., & Crossett, L. (1999). Smoking initiation and smoking patterns among U.S. college students. Journal of American College Health, 48, 55–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbert, D.G. (1995). Smoking: Individual differences, psychopathology, and emotion. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  12. Gollin, E.S., & Sharps, M.J. (1988). Facilitation of categorical blocking depends on stimulus type. Memory and Cognition, 16, 539–544.Google Scholar
  13. Keeling, R.P. (1999). Smoking among students: New pathways to prevention. Journal of American College Health, 48, 51–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lantz, P.M., Jacobson, P.D., Warner, P.D., Wasserman, J., Pollack, H.A., Berson, J., & Ahlstrom, A. (1999). Investing in youth tobacco control: A review of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tobacco Control, 9, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leischow, S.J., Ranger-Moore, J., & Lawrence, D. (2000). Addressing social and cultural disparities in tobacco use. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 821–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matthiessen, P. (1987). Wildlife in America. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  17. Milam, J.E., Sussman, S., Ritt-Olson, A., & Dent, C.W. (2000). Perceived invulnerability and cigarette smoking among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 71–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moskal, P.D., Dziuban, C.D., & West, G.B. (1999). Examining the use of tobacco on college campuses. Journal of American College Health, 47, 260–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmitz, J.M., Jarvik, M., & Schneider, N.G. (1997). Nicotine. In Lowinson, J.H., Ruiz, P., Millman, R.B., & Langrod, J.G. (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook (pp. 276–293). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  20. Sharps, M.J. (1990). A developmental approach to visual cognition in the elderly. In T. Hess (Ed.), Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 297–342). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Sharps, M.J. (1991). Spatial memory in young and elderly adults: Category structure of stimulus sets. Psychology and Aging, 6, 309–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharps, M.J. (1997). Category superiority effects in young and elderly adults. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158, 165–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharps, M.J. (1998). Age-related change in visual information processing: Toward a unified theory of aging and visual memory. Current Psychology, 16, 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharps, M.J. (2003). Aging, representation, and the nature of thought: Gestalt and feature-intensive processing. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  25. Sharps, M.J., & Antonelli, J.R.S. (1997). Visual and semantic support for paired-associates recall in young and older adults. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158, 347–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharps, M.J., Barber, T., Stahl, H., & Villegas, A.B. (2003). Eyewitness memory for weapons. The Forensic Examiner, 12, 34–37.Google Scholar
  27. Sharps, M.J., Foster, B.T., Martin, S.S., & Nunes, M.A. (1999). Spatial and relational frameworks for free recall in young and older adults. Current Psychology, 18, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharps, M.J., & Gollin, E.S. (1987a). Memory for object locations in young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 336–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sharps, M.J., & Gollin, E.S. (1987b). Speed and accuracy of mental image rotation in young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 342–344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharps, M.J., & Gollin, E.S. (1988). Aging and free recall for objects located in space. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 43, 8–11.Google Scholar
  31. Sharps, M.J., & Martin, S.S. (1998). Spatial memory in young and older adults: Environmental support and contextual influences at encoding and retrieval. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 5–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharps, M.J., & Martin, S.S. (2002). Mindless” decision making as a failure of contextual reasoning. Journal of Psychology, 136, 272–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharps, M.J., Martin, S.S., Nunes, M.A., & Merrill, M. (1999). Relational frameworks for recall in young and older adults. Current Psychology, 18, 254–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharps, M.J., & Nunes, M.A. (2002). Gestalt and feature-intensive processing: Toward a unified model of human information processing. Current Psychology, 21, 68–84.Google Scholar
  35. Sharps, M.J., & Pollitt, B.K. (1998). Category superiority effects and the processing of auditiory images. The Journal of General Psychology, 125, 109–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharps, M.J., & Price, J.L. (1992). Auditory imagery and free recall. Journal of General Psychology, 119, 81–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharps, M.J., Price, J.L, & Bence, V.M. (1996). Visual and auditory information as determinants of primacy effects. Journal of General Psychology, 123, 123–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharps, M. J., Price-Sharps, J.L., & Hanson, J. (2001). Body image preference in the United States and Thailand: An exploratory study. Journal of Psychology, 135, 518–526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharps, M. J., Price-Sharps, J.L., Day, S.S., Villegas, A.B., & Nunes, M.A. (2005a).Cognitive predisposition to substance abuse in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Addictive Behaviors, in press.Google Scholar
  40. Sharps, M.J., Price-Sharps, J.L., Day, S.S., Nunes, M.A., Villegas, A.B., & Mitchell, S. (2005b). Cognition at risk: Gestalt/Feature-Intensive Processing, Attention Deficit, and Substance Abuse. Current Psychology, 24 (2), 91–101.Google Scholar
  41. Sharps, M.J., & Tindall, M.H. (1992). Relational and item-specific information in the determination of “blocking effects.” Memory and Cognition, 20, 183–191.Google Scholar
  42. Sharps, M.J., & Wertheimer, M. (2000). Gestalt perspectives on cognitive science and on experimental psychology. Review of General Psychology, 4, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharps, M.J., Wilson-Leff, C.A., & Price, J.L. (1995). Relational and item-specific information as determinants of category superiority effects. Journal of General Psychology, 122, 271–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tickle, J.J., Sargent, J.D., Dalton, M.A., Beach, M.L., & Heatherton, T.F. (2001). Favourite movie stars, their tobacco use in contemporary movies, and its association with adolescent smoking. Tobacco Control, 10, 16–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Unger, J.B., Palmer, P.H., Dent, C.W., Rohrbach, L.A., & Johnson, C.A. (2000). Ethnic differences in adolescent smoking prevalence in California: Are multi-ethnic youth at higher risk? Tobacco Control, 9 (Suppl II), ii9-ii14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Viscusi, W.K. (1992). Smoking: Making the risky decision. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  47. Waters, A.J., & Sutton, S.R. (2000). Direct and indirect effects of nicotine/smoking on cognition in humans. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 29–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wechsler, H., Rigotti, N. A., Gledhill-Hoyt, J., & Lee, H. (1998). Increased levels of cigarette use amojng college students—A cause for national concern. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1673–1678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew J. Sharps
    • 1
  • Amy Boothby Villegas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Justin Matthews
    • 1
  1. 1.California State UniversityFresnoUSA
  2. 2.Alliant UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations