Forum for Social Economics

, Volume 38, Issue 2–3, pp 135–151 | Cite as

Do Professors’ Opinions Affect Students?

Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

This paper estimates the effect that professors’ opinions have on changes in student opinions during introductory economics classes. The paper shows that students are more likely to change their opinion during the course of the semester if their initial response differs from that of the professor, and this result emerges even after controlling for students’ tendency to move toward the consensus opinion held by all the economics professors. Students are also more likely to change their opinions if they differ from the opinions of their classmates, and the estimates show that in the aggregate, classmate opinions matter more than professor opinions do. The data also show that students choose which section to attend at least partly based on how closely their pre-class opinions match those of the professor. These results have important implications for both heterodox and orthodox economists.

Keywords

Teacher opinions Student opinions 

References

  1. Coyle, D. (2007). The soulful science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dow, S. (2007). Pluralism in economics. In J. Groenewegen (Ed.), Teaching pluralism in economics (pp. 22–39). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Greene, W. (1990). Econometric analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Groenewegen, J. (2007). On pluralism and interdisciplinarity in economics. In J. Groenewegen (Ed.), Teaching pluralism in economics (pp. 1–21). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Hansmann, R., Crott, H., & Scholz, R. (2007). Momentum effects in discussions on intellective tasks: Comparing informed and non-informed groups. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackstadt, S., Brennan, J., & Thompson, S. (1985). The effect of introductory economics courses on college students’ conservatism. The Journal of Economic Education, 16, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knoedler, J., & Underwood, D. (2003). Teaching the principles of economics: A proposal for a multi-paradigmatic approach. Journal of Economic Issues, 37, 697–725.Google Scholar
  8. Rhodes, N., & Wood, W. (1992). Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenceability: The mediating role of message reception. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Riddle, T. (1978). Student opinions on economic issues: The effects of an introductory economics course. The Journal of Economic Education, 9, 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schneider, G., & Shackelford, J. (2001). Economics standards and lists: Proposed antidotes for feminist economists. Feminist Economics, 7, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schultz, P. W. (2005). Attitudes and opinions (3rd ed.). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Sciarini, P., & Kriesi, H. (2003). Opinion stability and change during an electoral campaign: results from the 1999 Swiss Election Panel Study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Walstad, W. (1997). The effect of economic knowledge on public opinion of economic issues. The Journal of Economic Education, 28, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Whaples, R. (1995). Changes in attitudes among college economics students about the fairness of the market. The Journal of Economic Education, 26, 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Social Economics 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsBucknell UniversityLewisburgUSA

Personalised recommendations