Human Rights Review

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 243–262 | Cite as

International Law and Voter Preferences: the Case of Foreign Human Rights Violations



  1. Baum, Matthew A. and Potter, Philip B.K.. 2008. The Relationships between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis. Annual. Review of Political Science 11: 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaudoin, Stephen. 2014. Promises or policies? An experimental analysis of international agreements and audience reactions. International Organization 68, 01: 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Handler Chayes. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47.02: 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chilton, Adam S. 2014. The Influence of International Human Rights Agreements on Public Opinion: An Experimental Study. Chicago Journal of International Law, 15, 110–137.Google Scholar
  5. Chilton, Adam S. and Dustin Tingley. 2013. Why the Study of International Law Needs Experiments. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 52: 173–237.Google Scholar
  6. Cleveland, Sarah H. 2002. Human Rights Sanctions and International Trade: A Theory of Compatibility Journal of International Economic Law 5:1, 133–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Downs, George W., David M. Rocke, and Peter N. Barsoom, 1996, Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization, 50:3, 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drezner, Daniel W. 1999. The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fearon, James D., 1997. Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands Versus Sinking Costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1):.68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischhoff, Baruch. 1993. “Value Elicitation: Is There Anything in There?” The Origins of Values, (Michael Hechter, Lynn Nadel & Richard E. Michod, eds). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. 187–214.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, Monroe. Consumer Boycotts: Effecting Change Through Markets and the Media. 1999 New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Gartzke, Erik, and Yonatan Lupu. 2012. Still looking for audience costs. Security Studies 21, 3: 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerber, Alan S. and Donald P. Green. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Goldsmith, Jack L. and Eric A. Posner. 2005. The Limits of International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Goldstein, Judith, Robert O. Keohane, Miles Kahler, Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2001. Legalization and World Politics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goodman, Ryan and Derek Jinks. 2008. Incomplete Internationalization and Compliance with International Human Rights Law European Journal of International Law 19:4, 725–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman, Ryan and Derek Jinks 2003. Measuring the Effects of Human Rights Treaties. European Journal of International Law 12: 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hafner Burton, Emilie. 2009. Forced to Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Improve Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hafner Burton Emilie and James Ron. 2009. Seeing Double: Human Rights through Qualitative and Quantitative Eyes World Politics 61:2, 360–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hafner Burton Emilie and Kiyoteru Tsutsui. 2007. Justice Lost! The Failure of Human Rights Law to Matter Where Needed Most Journal of Peace Research 44.4: 407–425Google Scholar
  21. Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal 111: 1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hathaway, Oona A. 2007. Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution 51:4 588–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henkin, Louis. 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Holsti, Ole R. 2004. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hurwitz, Jon and Mark Peffley. 1987. How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model American Political Science Review. 81:4, 1099–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Benjamin I. Page. 2005. Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy? American Political Science Review 99:1, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaempfer, William H. and Anton D. Lowenberg. 1992. Using Threshold Models to Explain International Relations Public Choice 73, 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaempfer, William H. and Anton D. Lowenberg 1988. The Theory of International Economic Sanctions: A Public Choice Approach The American Economic Review 78.4: 786–793Google Scholar
  29. Keck, Margaret and Katherine Sikkink. 1998.Google Scholar
  30. Keohane, Robert O. 1997 International Relations and International Law: Two Optics. Harvard International Law Journal. 38:2 (Spring) 487–502.Google Scholar
  31. Koh, Harold Hongju. 1997.Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Yale Law Journal 106:8, 2599–2660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lupu, Yonatan. 2013. Best evidence: The role of information in domestic judicial enforcement of international human rights agreements International Organization 67, 03: 469–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McFarland, Sam and Melissa Mathews. 2005. Do Americans Care About Human Rights? Journal of Human Rights, 4: 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, Lisa L. 1994. Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nash, Kate. 2009. The Cultural Politics of Human Rights: Comparing the US and UK. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neumeyer, Eric, 2005, Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49:6, 925–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 1999. Redefining the National Interest. Foreign Affairs, (July/August).Google Scholar
  38. Powlick, Philip J. and Andrew Z. Katz. 1998. Defining the American Public Opinion/Foreign Policy Nexus Mershon International Studies Review 42, 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodman, Kenneth A. 1998. Think Globally, Punish Locally’: Non-State Actors, Multinational Corporations, and Human Rights Sanctions. Ethics and International Affairs. 12: 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Salehyan, Idean. 2008. The Externalities of Civil Strife: Refugees as a Source of International Conflict American Journal of Political Science 52:4, 787–801.Google Scholar
  42. Shapiro, Robert Y. and Benjamin I. Page. 1988. Foreign Policy and the Rational Public Journal of Conflict Resolution 32, 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simmons, Beth. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simmons, Beth 1998. Compliance with International Agreements. Annual Review of Political Science, 1: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sniderman, Paul M. and Sean M. Thierault. 2004. The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing” in Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error and Change (Willem E. Saris and Paul M. Sniderman, eds.) 133–165.Google Scholar
  46. Snyder, Jack, and Erica D. Borghard. 2011. The cost of empty threats: A penny, not a pound. American Political Science Review 105,03: 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steinberg, David. Globalization, Dissent, and Orthodoxy: Burma/Myanmar and the Saffron Revolution Georgetown Journal of International Affairs (2008): 51–58.Google Scholar
  48. Tomz, Michael. 2007. Domestic audience costs in international relations: An experimental approach International Organization 61.04 821–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomz, Michael 2008. Reputation and the Effect of International Law on Preferences and Beliefs. Manuscript,
  50. Von Stein, Jana.2016 Making Promises, Keeping Promises: Democracy, Ratification and Compliance in International Human Rights Law British Journal of Political Science 46, 03: 655–679.Google Scholar
  51. Wallace, Geoffrey PR. International law and public attitudes toward torture: An experimental study International Organization 67.01 (2013): 105–140.Google Scholar
  52. Wittkopf, Eugene R. 1990. Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science, Arnold A. Salzman Institute of War and Peace StudiesColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Politics, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International AffairsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations