Human Rights Review

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 515–530 | Cite as

Justice, Human Rights, and Reconciliation in Postconflict Cambodia

  • Susan DicklitchEmail author
  • Aditi Malik


Retribution? Restitution? Reconciliation? “Justice” comes in many forms as witnessed by the spike in war crimes tribunals, Truth & Reconciliation Commissions, hybrid tribunals and genocide trials. Which, if any form is appropriate should be influenced by the culture of the people affected. It took Cambodia over three decades to finally address the ghosts of its Khmer Rouge past with the creation of a hybrid Khmer Rouge Tribunal. But how meaningful is justice to the majority of survivors of the Khmer Rouge auto-genocide when only a handful of top officials are tried? Further, given the persistent abuse of political and economic rights in post-conflict Cambodia, we are skeptical that justice or reconciliation is presently possible.


Justice Cambodia Genocide Human rights Truth and reconciliation 


  1. Amnesty International (25 September 2008a) Cambodia: Human Rights Defenders Silenced Through the Legal System.
  2. Amnesty International (11 February 2008b) Cambodia Burns Homes of the Poor.
  3. Eng, Kok-Thay (2003) Khmer Rouge History: Educating the Young Generations. Documentation Center of Cambodia, Special English ed., 3d Quarter, 1.Google Scholar
  4. Fletcher, Laurel E. and Weinstein, Harvey M. (2002) Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly, 24, 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freedom House (2007) Freedom in the World 2007: Freedom Stagnation amid Pushback Against Democracy.
  6. Freedom House (2 July 2008) Freedom in the World 2008 – Cambodia. UNHCR Refworld,
  7. Herman, Judith L. (1997) Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror (New York, NY: Basic Books), p. 175.Google Scholar
  8. Heubeline, Patrick and Poch, Bunnk (2007) The Phoenix Population: Demographic Crisis and Rebound in Cambodia. Demography, 44, 405-406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hinton, Alexander (2006) We Can’t Let the Khmer Rouge Escape. The Washington Post, 3.Google Scholar
  10. Human Rights Center (University of California, Berkeley) (2009) So We Will Never Forget: A Population-Based Survey on Attitudes about social reconstruction and the extraordinary chambers in the courts of Cambodia,
  11. Human Rights Watch (2006) Cambodia: Government Interferes in Khmer Rouge Tribunal.
  12. Human Rights Watch (January 2007) Cambodia: Country Summary.Google Scholar
  13. Human Rights Watch (25 July 2008a) Cambodia: Threats, Intimidation Mar Campaign.
  14. Human Rights Watch (July 2008b) Cambodia: Murder of Journalist Jolts Run-Up to Election.
  15. Jacobsen, Trudy (2006) “Punishing the perpetrators of the Cambodian Genocide”, Asia Insights, Theme: Justice in Cambodia”, NIAS (Nordic Institute for Asian Studies), No. 3, December, p. 6.Google Scholar
  16. Jendrzecjzyk, Mike (2002) Cambodians, Too, Deserve Justice. The International Herald Tribune.Google Scholar
  17. Khmer Institute for Democracy (2004) Survey on the Khmer Rouge Regime and the Khmer Rouge Tribunal 2004, Khmer Institute for Democracy. pp. 11, 12, 17Google Scholar
  18. Kiernan, Ben (1996) The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power and Genocide in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975-1979 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press) p. 456-460Google Scholar
  19. Kissinger, Henry (1994) Diplomacy (New York, NY: Simon and Schuster). p. 694.Google Scholar
  20. Kurlantzick, Joshua (2000) Letter from the Killing Fields: Cambodia Now. The Washington Quarterly, 23, 21-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCargo, Duncan (2005) “Cambodia: Getting Away with Authoritarianism”, Journal of Democracy, 16Google Scholar
  22. Montero, David (2008) In Cambodia vote, stability wins. Christian Science Monitor, 29 July 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Raszelenberg, Patrick (1999) The Khmers Rouges and the Final Solution. History & Memory, 11, 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sreang, Heng (2006) “Justice in Cambodia: A Short Reflection on some obstacles to implementing “justice” within the context of the law in present-day Cambodia”, Asia Insights, Theme: Justice in Cambodia”, NIAS (Nordic Institute for Asian Studies), No. 3, December, p. 21.Google Scholar
  25. Timberg, Craig (2008) Sierra Leone Special Court’s Narrow Focus: Well-Funded but Selective War Crimes Probe Draws Resentment of Impoverished Victims. The Washington Post (online).Google Scholar
  26. UNHCR (30 October 2008) Cambodia: Concern over UN Human Rights Role.,,,,KHM,,490ad4d4c,0.html.
  27. United Nations Development Program (2008) Human Development Report 2007–2008.
  28. van Schaack, Beth (1997) The Crime of Political Genocide: Repairing the Genocide Convention’s Blind Spot. The Yale Law Journal, 106, 2269–2270.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ware Institute for Civic EngagementFranklin & Marshall CollegeLancasterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceNorthWestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations