Human Rights Review

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 413–433 | Cite as

Women’s Right to Asylum: Protecting the Rights of Female Asylum Seekers in Europe?

Article

Abstract

Criticisms have been made against international laws and conventions on asylum and refugees, arguing that these have been based on a male model of definition, which have ignored women’s persecutions. This article will argue that recent developments in European asylum policy have the potential to deepen this discrimination and to further reduce the rights of female asylum seekers. Although there have been some positive developments in jurisprudence that have recognised that gender-specific persecution may be the basis for granting asylum, these advances remain relatively sporadic and are undermined by the operation of random and discretionary exercises of power by bureaucrats and decision makers in many cases. Further, although new developments in asylum policy are in theory “gender neutral,” differences in the material circumstances of men and women who arrive to seek asylum may mean in effect that the implications of these policies are deeply gendered.

Keywords

Asylum Refugees Gender Europe 

References

  1. Ankenbrand, B. (2002), Refugee Women under German Asylum Law, International Journal of Refugee Law, 14, 1: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bexelius, M. (2006), Swedish Law and Practice and Gender Persecution: Summary Conclusions and Comments, unpublished document provided by author.Google Scholar
  3. Bhabha, J. and Shutter, S. (1994), Women’s Movement: Women Under Immigration, Nationality and Refugee Law. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  4. Binder, S. and Tosic, J. (2005), ‘Refugees as a Particular Form of Transnational Migrations and Social Transformations: Socioanthropological and Gender Aspects’, Current Sociology, 53, 4, pp. 607–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloch, A. and L. Schuster (2002), Asylum and Welfare: Contemporary Debates, Critical Social Policy, 22, 3, pp. 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloch, A. and Schuster, L. (2005), ‘At the extremes of exclusion: Deportation, detention and dispersal’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 3, pp. 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloch, A., Galvin, T. and Harrell-Bond, B. (2000), ‘Refugee Women in Europe: Some Aspects of the Legal and Policy Dimensions’, International Migration, 38, 2: 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boswell, C. (2000), European Values and the Asylum Crisis, International Affairs, 76, 3: 537–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boswell, C. (2003), ‘The “external dimension” of EU immigration and asylum policy’, International Affairs, 79, 3, pp. 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bunch, C. (1995), ‘Transforming Human Rights from a Feminist Perspective’, in J. Peter and A. Wolpe (eds), Women’s Rights, Human Rights, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. BWRAP and WAR (2006), Misjudging Rape: Breaching Gender Guidelines and International Law in Asylum Appeals, London: Crossroads Books.Google Scholar
  12. Carpenter, R. C. (2005), “Women, Children and Other Vulnerable Groups”: Gender, Strategic Frames and the Protection of Civilians as a Transnational Issue, International Studies Quarterly, 49: 486–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Center for Reproductive Rights (2003), Body and Soul: Forced Sterilization and Other Assaults on Roma Reproductive Freedom, New York: Center for Reproductive Rights.Google Scholar
  14. Charlesworth, H. and Chinkin, C. (2000), The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Charlesworth, H. et al (1991), ‘Feminist Approaches to International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 85, pp. 613–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cimade (2006), Centres et locaux de rétention administrative – rapport 2005, Paris: Cimade.Google Scholar
  17. Clarence, E. (2003), Ignored and Isolated: Women and Asylum Policy in the United Kingdom, in J. Freedman (ed), Gender and Insecurity: Migrant Women in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Copelon, R. (1994), ‘Intimate terror: Understanding domestic violence as torture’, in R. Cook (ed), Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  19. Crawley, H. (2001), Refugees and Gender: Law and Process, Bristol: Jordan.Google Scholar
  20. Crawley, H. and Lester, T. (2004), Comparative Analysis of Gender-Related Persecution in National Asylum Legislation and Practice in Europe, Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  21. Daniel, E. V. (1996), Charred Lullabies: Chapters in an Anthropology of Violence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Duvell, F. and Jordan, B. (2002), Immigration, Asylum and Welfare: The European Context, Critical Social Policy, 22, 3: 498–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eagle, A. (2002), Asylum Seekers’ Experiences of the Voucher Scheme in the United Kingdom–Fieldwork Report, London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  24. Enloe, C. (2000), Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Forbes Martin, S. (2004), Refugee Women, Maryland: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  26. Freedman, J. (2003), Selling Sex: Trafficking, Prostitution and Sex Work amongst Migrant Women in Europe, in J. Freedman (ed), Gender and Insecurity: Migrant Women in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  27. Freedman, J. (2007), Gendering the International Asylum and Refugee Debate, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Geddes, A. (2000), Immigration and European Integration: Towards Fortress Europe? Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goodwin-Gill, G. (1996), The Refugee in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. International Commission of Jurists (2003), Violence Against Women in Bangladesh, Geneva: International Commission of Jurists.Google Scholar
  31. Jaubany-Baucells, O. (2002), ‘The state of welfare for asylum seekers and refugees in Spain’, Critical Social Policy, 22, 3, pp. 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kennedy, P. and Murphy-Lawless, J. (2003), The Maternity Care Needs of Refugee and Asylum-Seeking Women in Ireland, Feminist Review, 73: 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kofman, E., Phizacklea, A., Raghuram, P., Sales, R. (2000), Gender and International Migration in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Koser, K. (2001), ‘New approaches to asylum?’, International Migration, 39, 6, pp. 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Legal Action for Women (2006), A “Bleak House” in Our Times: An investigation into women’s rights violations at Yarl’s Wood Removal Centre, London: Crossroads Books.Google Scholar
  36. Liedtke, M. (2002), ‘National welfare and asylum in Germany’, Critical Social Policy, 22, 3, pp. 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Macklin, A. (1995), Refugee Women and the Imperative of Categories, Human Rights Quarterly, 17, pp. 213–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malloch, M. and Stanley, L. (2005), ‘The detention of asylum seekers in the UK: Representing risk, managing the dangerous’, Punishment and Society, 7, 1, pp. 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mohanty, C. T. (1991), Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Molyneux, M. and Razavi, S. (2002), Gender Justice, Development and Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Montgomery, E. and Foldspang, A. (2005), ‘Predictors of the Authorities’ Decision to Grant Asylum in Denmark’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 18, 4, pp. 454–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morris, L. (2002), Britain’s asylum and immigration regime: the shifting contours of rights, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28, 3: 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Noiriel, G. (1991), Réfugiés et sans-papiers. La République face au droit d’asile, Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
  44. Oswin, N. (2001), An Exploration of Feminist Approaches to Refugee Law, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 3, 3: 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oxfam and the Refugee Council (2002), Poverty and Asylum in the UK, London: Refugee Council.Google Scholar
  46. Pearce, H. (2003), An Examination of the International Understanding of Political Rape and the Significance of Labeling it Torture, International Journal of Refugee Law, 14, 4: 534–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rao, A. (1995), ‘The Politics of Gender and Culture in International Human Rights Discourse’ in J. Peters and A. Wolper (ed), Women’s Rights, Human Rights, New York: Routledge, pp. 167–175.Google Scholar
  48. Refugee Action (2002), Is it Safe Here? Refugee Women’s Experiences in the United Kingdom, London: Refugee Action.Google Scholar
  49. Refugee Women’s Resource Project (2005a), Women’s Asylum News, 52, July-August, London: Refugee Women’s Resource Project.Google Scholar
  50. Refugee Women’s Resource Project (2005b), Women’s Asylum News, 53, September, London: Refugee Women’s Resource Project.Google Scholar
  51. Refugee Women’s Resources Project (2006), “Lip service” or implementation: The Home Office Gender Guidance and women's asylum claims in the UK, London: Refugee Women’s Resources Project.Google Scholar
  52. Sales, R. (2002), The Deserving and the Underserving? Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Welfare in Britain, Contemporary Social Policy, 22, 3: 456–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sen, G. and Correa, S. (1999), Gender Justice and Economic Justice, New York: UNIFEM.Google Scholar
  54. Spijkerboer, T. (2000), Gender and Refugee Status, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  55. Stevens, M. (1993), ‘Recognizing gender-specific persecution: A proposal to add gender as a sixth refugee category’, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, pp. 179–219.Google Scholar
  56. UNHCR (1991), Guidelines on the Protection of Refugee Women, Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  57. UNHCR (1995), Sexual violence against refugees: Guidelines on protection and response, Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  58. UNHCR (2002), Guidelines on international protection: Gender-related persecution within the context of Article 1(A)2 of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  59. UNHCR (2006), The State of the World’s Refugees, Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  60. Valji, N. (2001), ‘Women and the 1951 Refugee Convention: Fifty Years of Seeking Visibility’, Refuge, 19, 5, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
  61. Valluy, J. (2004), ‘La fiction juridique de l’asile’, Plein Droit, 63, Décembre 2004.Google Scholar
  62. Valluy, J. (2005), ‘La nouvelle Europe politique des camps d’exilés: genèse d’une source élitaire de phobie et de repression des étrangers’, Cultures et Conflits, 57, pp. 13–69.Google Scholar
  63. Wallace, R. and Holliday, A. (2005), ‘The Application of the Gender Guidelines with the UK Asylum Determination Process’, AIT Legal and Research Unit Update, Issue 12, June 2005, London: AIT.Google Scholar
  64. Welch, M. and Schuster, L. (2005), ‘Detention of asylum seekers in the UK, France, Germany and Italy: A critical view of the globalizing culture of control’, Criminal Justice, 5, 4, pp. 331–355.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chaire Marie Curie, Centre de Recherches Politiques de la SorbonneUniversite de Paris 1 –Pantheon SorbonneParisFrance

Personalised recommendations