Human Rights Review

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 137–156 | Cite as

Zeugmatic Spaces: Eastern/Central European Feminisms



This article stems from a sense of discontent and frustration that the cultural position of Eastern/Central European feminisms have not been theorized enough in comparison with other non-First World feminisms. To construct my argument, I use a rhetorical figure, zeugma, which is able to underpin the specificity and the commonalities of the post-Communist area feminisms as compared to the hegemonic feminisms of the world or to Third World feminisms. Zeugma (from an ancient Greek word meaning “bridge”) is a figure of speech that relies on balance and acceptance of grammatical difference. An almost perfect cultural space shifter, Eastern/Central Europe produces feminist discourses that constitute, in my opinion, zeugmatic spaces in the worldwide concerto of world feminisms.

I suggest that many of the problems of contemporary feminist theory arise from the context that has defined feminist theory. Only if we fully understand this context will we be in a position to understand how to escape from the dilemmas posed by this context” (Joan C. Tronto, Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care)

“Which is why the critique of all discourses concerning gender, including those produced or promoted as feminist, continues to be as vital a part of feminism as is the ongoing effort to create new spaces of discourse, to rewrite cultural narratives, and to define the terms of another perspective—a view from ‘elsewhere’” (Teresa de Lauretis, Technologies of Gender)


Feminist Scholarship Communist Regime Woman Writer Academic Capitalism Feminist Discourse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Andrijasevic, Rutivca. 2000. “Migration and Fortress Europe.” In Rosi Braidotti, Esther Vonk, Sonja van Wichelen (eds.), The Making of European Studies. Utrecht University: Athena. vol. I, 152–153.Google Scholar
  2. Braidotti, Rosi. 1994. Nomadic Subjects. Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia UP.Google Scholar
  3. Braidotti, Rosi. 2000. “Key Terms and Issues in the Making of European Women’s Studies” In Rosi Braidotti, Esther Vonk, Sonja van Wichelen (eds.), The Making of European Studies. Utrecht University: Athena. vol. I,12–22.Google Scholar
  4. Calinescu, George. 1998–1999. Istoria literaturii române de la origine până în prezent. Bucureşti: Cartea românească.Google Scholar
  5. Cheschebec, Roxana. 2005. Feminist Ideologies and Activism in Romania (approx. 1890’s–1940’s). Nationalism and Internationalism in Romanian Projects for Women’s Emancipation (unpublished PhD thesis). Budapest: Central European University.Google Scholar
  6. Cosma, Ghizela. 2002. Femeile si politica in Romania. Evolutia dreptului de voi in perioada interbelica. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitara Clujeana.Google Scholar
  7. Cozea, Liana. 1994. Prozatoare ale literaturii române. Oradea: Biblioteca revistei “Familia.”Google Scholar
  8. Jaggar, Alison M. and Iris Marion Young (eds.). 1998. A Companion to Feminist Philosophy. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Lerner, Gerda. 1986. Women and History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Magyari-Vincze, Enikö. 2000. “Translation as a Linguistic Issue: the Case of Romania.” In Rosi Braidotti, Esther Vonk, Sonja van Wichelen (eds.). The Making of European Studies. Utrecht University: Athena. vol. IV, 84–92.Google Scholar
  11. McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in Colonial Context. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Mihailescu, Stefania. 2002. Din istoria feminismului romanesc. Antologie de texte. Iasi: Polirom.Google Scholar
  13. Miroiu, Mihaela. 2002. Convenio: despre natură, femei şi morală. Iaşi: Polirom.Google Scholar
  14. Nemoianu, Virgil. 1989. A Theory of the Secondary: Literature, Progress, and Reaction. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP.Google Scholar
  15. Niel, Mathilda. 1974. Drama eliberarii femeii. Trad. Ecaterina Oproiu. Bucuresti: Editura politica.Google Scholar
  16. Offen, Karen. 2000. European Feminisms: 1700–1950: A Political History. Stanford: Stanford UP.Google Scholar
  17. Oproiu, Ecaterina (et al.). 1974. Cartea fetelor. Bucuresti: Editura politica.Google Scholar
  18. Oproiu, Ecaterina. 1975. 3x8 plus infinitul. Dialoguri despre conditia femeii. Bucureşti: Eminescu.Google Scholar
  19. Reuman, Ann R. 2000. “Coming into Play. An interview with Gloria Anzaldua.” Melus, 25(2), Latino/a Identities (Summer), 3–45.Google Scholar
  20. Sebastian, Mihail. 1996. Jurnal 1935–1944. Ed. Gabriela Omat. Pref. Leon Volovici. Bucuresti: Humanitas.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Babes-Bolyai University in ClujClujRomania

Personalised recommendations